[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @DaveNadig Dave Nadig Dave Nadig posts on X about if you, blackrock, tarrifs, doj the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::16467450/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX +471% - X Month XXXXXXX +432% - X Months XXXXXXX +107% - X Year XXXXXXX -XX% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::16467450/posts_active)  - X Months XXX +383% - X Year XXX +32% ### Followers: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::16467450/followers)  - X Week XXXXXX +0.51% - X Month XXXXXX +0.87% - X Months XXXXXX +4.40% - X Year XXXXXX +6.40% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::16467450/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::16467450/influence) --- **Social category influence** [finance](/list/finance) [celebrities](/list/celebrities) [stocks](/list/stocks) [musicians](/list/musicians) **Social topic influence** [if you](/topic/if-you), [blackrock](/topic/blackrock), [tarrifs](/topic/tarrifs), [doj](/topic/doj), [alice cooper](/topic/alice-cooper), [cta](/topic/cta), [overnight](/topic/overnight), [fund manager](/topic/fund-manager), [brains](/topic/brains), [notification](/topic/notification) **Top assets mentioned** [BlackRock Inc (BLK)](/topic/blackrock) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::16467450/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "@Ritholtz @mark_dow @profplum99 From tomorrow's Blog: Nobody not me or Green or anyone else is telling you this means "Sell" or "Don't Index" It's telling you "pay attention at short time horizons" because short term flow reversals can have significantly convex impacts (both ways)"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1949232743566733667) 2025-07-26 22:17:55 UTC 21.4K followers, 1715 engagements "Like literally this is 1984 stuff. The party asks you deny the things you know and saw with your own eyes. We're just supposed to accept "yeah that Biden appointee." What's next "I can't believe the Biden admin was so disorganized abotu tarrifs.""  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1945568246067073075) 2025-07-16 19:36:31 UTC 21.4K followers, 2073 engagements "@AdviserCounsel Not being a lawyer is it weird that their claiming nobody ever spoke to her during the (Trump-era) DOJ charging and trial of Epstein Or do I not understand how this stuff works"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1948900289693843490) 2025-07-26 00:16:52 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements "@PaulKim_ETFs @choffstein @WallStreet_Rant You keep telling me a writer to hire a XX act lawyer Is that what you tell all your clients too Hire your own lawyer if you don't like it How about "Avoid Black Hat Funds" - that seems cheaper than hiring a lawyer as a writer or financial advisor"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1949532856017146099) 2025-07-27 18:10:28 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements "@Jon_Fee_ @TaxAlphaInsider Sure thing mostly I was seeing if you had a better pull than GP. Alice Cooper"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1949159965609861524) 2025-07-26 17:28:44 UTC 21.4K followers, XX engagements "Show me the example where a fund has gone from "internal capability" at X cost to "outsourced capability" and not changed the fee. CTA is its OWN LEGAL ENTITY. Why is it now not getting the cash management 75bps was paying for Plenty of funds are DESIGNED with a fee that incorporates the AFFE. This is the only example I've found in days of searchign where a fund has added AFFE after the fact to cover a CONTRACTUAL obligation already paid for"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1949529843827458481) 2025-07-27 17:58:29 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements "@adamsussman Boxx very cool -- but not "really" a MM fund equivalent. Absolutely *can* be for an individual taxable investor. But not like collateral"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1949544775549694385) 2025-07-27 18:57:49 UTC 21.4K followers, XX engagements "@choffstein @PaulKim_ETFs Bummer. Kinda been scrolling through prospectuses for a few hours. Can't find anything where more than a percent or two is involved where there's not a waiver. Here's Blackrock on ISMF for instance"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1949159749385367701) 2025-07-26 17:27:52 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements "@aaronbrask If a fund manager has an immediate overnight cash need (big unexpected redemption comes in at 4PM) they have bank lines-of-credit to cover them until a sale of Treasuries or other securities settles"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1949261684524396567) 2025-07-27 00:12:55 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements "@TaxAlphaInsider It's BEYOND good. It's absolute perfection. I've been wracking my brains for a better suggestion as someone with a decent amount of time in the brand-trenches. @Jon_Fee_ who you got. Who's a better pull than this for the same level of company I think it's inspired"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1948968730727514554) 2025-07-26 04:48:50 UTC 21.4K followers, XX engagements "@PaulKim_ETFs @SimplifyETFs Your MTBA clients were payign 17bps one day and 28.25bps the next. That's a call you get to make. Didn't see any notification to MTBA shareholders letting them know. But sure if you add enough value maybe they'll forgive you the stealth XX% fee hike"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1949544612282208632) 2025-07-27 18:57:11 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements "@PaulKim_ETFs @choffstein Y'all been solid innovators and I've always said so when asked on air or writing. I wrote the first article on SPYC. I'm just as honestly saying "this is some BS right here" when you manufactured 2B in AUM and 3.5mm in annual fee overnight"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1949139443446636774) 2025-07-26 16:07:11 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements "@PaulKim_ETFs @SimplifyETFs As you are amply proving with each additional post: there's not much room to run an ETF business ethicly and still "get rich" in ETFs so I'll "have fun staying poor" making a living one substack subscriber at a time. I sleep very well"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1949551660755517594) 2025-07-27 19:25:11 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements "I hate "being negative" about stuff but @SimplifyETFs but their new double-dipping strategy with $SBIL needs a response. You can't just manufacture $3m in new fees from your investors and pretend its not happening. (thread)"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1948757486053314638) 2025-07-25 14:49:25 UTC 21.4K followers, 95.2K engagements "@PaulKim_ETFs @SimplifyETFs Well you gave yourself an imaginary $2.1B head start on the assets leaving Extremely gross. You can disagree that's fine. I'll keep pointing out the stuff that's clearly obviously black hat. You choose to join YieldMaxx and Tuttle and embrace it. I choose to chant "shame""  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1949537082462118132) 2025-07-27 18:27:15 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements "@SmokinPowell Yes that's exactly the Invesco example I used: they rebate the fees on the cash management products. It's in pretty much any prospectus you look at. Here's a blackrock example (COMT). Every cash-heavy fund I've found has language like this. Except Simplify"  [@DaveNadig](/creator/x/DaveNadig) on [X](/post/tweet/1948843168369443325) 2025-07-25 20:29:53 UTC 21.4K followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Dave Nadig posts on X about if you, blackrock, tarrifs, doj the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence finance celebrities stocks musicians
Social topic influence if you, blackrock, tarrifs, doj, alice cooper, cta, overnight, fund manager, brains, notification
Top assets mentioned BlackRock Inc (BLK)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@Ritholtz @mark_dow @profplum99 From tomorrow's Blog: Nobody not me or Green or anyone else is telling you this means "Sell" or "Don't Index" It's telling you "pay attention at short time horizons" because short term flow reversals can have significantly convex impacts (both ways)" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-26 22:17:55 UTC 21.4K followers, 1715 engagements
"Like literally this is 1984 stuff. The party asks you deny the things you know and saw with your own eyes. We're just supposed to accept "yeah that Biden appointee." What's next "I can't believe the Biden admin was so disorganized abotu tarrifs."" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-16 19:36:31 UTC 21.4K followers, 2073 engagements
"@AdviserCounsel Not being a lawyer is it weird that their claiming nobody ever spoke to her during the (Trump-era) DOJ charging and trial of Epstein Or do I not understand how this stuff works" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-26 00:16:52 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements
"@PaulKim_ETFs @choffstein @WallStreet_Rant You keep telling me a writer to hire a XX act lawyer Is that what you tell all your clients too Hire your own lawyer if you don't like it How about "Avoid Black Hat Funds" - that seems cheaper than hiring a lawyer as a writer or financial advisor" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-27 18:10:28 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements
"@Jon_Fee_ @TaxAlphaInsider Sure thing mostly I was seeing if you had a better pull than GP. Alice Cooper" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-26 17:28:44 UTC 21.4K followers, XX engagements
"Show me the example where a fund has gone from "internal capability" at X cost to "outsourced capability" and not changed the fee. CTA is its OWN LEGAL ENTITY. Why is it now not getting the cash management 75bps was paying for Plenty of funds are DESIGNED with a fee that incorporates the AFFE. This is the only example I've found in days of searchign where a fund has added AFFE after the fact to cover a CONTRACTUAL obligation already paid for" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-27 17:58:29 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements
"@adamsussman Boxx very cool -- but not "really" a MM fund equivalent. Absolutely can be for an individual taxable investor. But not like collateral" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-27 18:57:49 UTC 21.4K followers, XX engagements
"@choffstein @PaulKim_ETFs Bummer. Kinda been scrolling through prospectuses for a few hours. Can't find anything where more than a percent or two is involved where there's not a waiver. Here's Blackrock on ISMF for instance" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-26 17:27:52 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements
"@aaronbrask If a fund manager has an immediate overnight cash need (big unexpected redemption comes in at 4PM) they have bank lines-of-credit to cover them until a sale of Treasuries or other securities settles" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-27 00:12:55 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements
"@TaxAlphaInsider It's BEYOND good. It's absolute perfection. I've been wracking my brains for a better suggestion as someone with a decent amount of time in the brand-trenches. @Jon_Fee_ who you got. Who's a better pull than this for the same level of company I think it's inspired" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-26 04:48:50 UTC 21.4K followers, XX engagements
"@PaulKim_ETFs @SimplifyETFs Your MTBA clients were payign 17bps one day and 28.25bps the next. That's a call you get to make. Didn't see any notification to MTBA shareholders letting them know. But sure if you add enough value maybe they'll forgive you the stealth XX% fee hike" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-27 18:57:11 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements
"@PaulKim_ETFs @choffstein Y'all been solid innovators and I've always said so when asked on air or writing. I wrote the first article on SPYC. I'm just as honestly saying "this is some BS right here" when you manufactured 2B in AUM and 3.5mm in annual fee overnight" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-26 16:07:11 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements
"@PaulKim_ETFs @SimplifyETFs As you are amply proving with each additional post: there's not much room to run an ETF business ethicly and still "get rich" in ETFs so I'll "have fun staying poor" making a living one substack subscriber at a time. I sleep very well" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-27 19:25:11 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements
"I hate "being negative" about stuff but @SimplifyETFs but their new double-dipping strategy with $SBIL needs a response. You can't just manufacture $3m in new fees from your investors and pretend its not happening. (thread)" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-25 14:49:25 UTC 21.4K followers, 95.2K engagements
"@PaulKim_ETFs @SimplifyETFs Well you gave yourself an imaginary $2.1B head start on the assets leaving Extremely gross. You can disagree that's fine. I'll keep pointing out the stuff that's clearly obviously black hat. You choose to join YieldMaxx and Tuttle and embrace it. I choose to chant "shame"" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-27 18:27:15 UTC 21.4K followers, XXX engagements
"@SmokinPowell Yes that's exactly the Invesco example I used: they rebate the fees on the cash management products. It's in pretty much any prospectus you look at. Here's a blackrock example (COMT). Every cash-heavy fund I've found has language like this. Except Simplify" @DaveNadig on X 2025-07-25 20:29:53 UTC 21.4K followers, XX engagements
/creator/x::DaveNadig