[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  EndGame Macro [@onechancefreedm](/creator/twitter/onechancefreedm) on x 39.6K followers Created: 2025-07-20 21:51:04 UTC If stablecoins don’t pay any interest, people won’t want to hold them, especially with inflation eating away at their value. But if they do pay interest, they start pulling money out of regular banks, which threatens the whole banking model. That’s the catch. Either no one uses them, or they end up draining the system we already have. And maybe that’s actually the point. Maybe the goal isn’t to protect the old system but to slowly move toward a new one where banks aren’t at the center anymore. When you really look at it, it starts to feel like they’re trying to take down the current banking model in a quiet, controlled way. If the Treasury rolls out stablecoins that pay interest especially in the middle of a crisis, they don’t need to convince people to switch. They just need to make it look safer and easier than your regular checking account. Suddenly, people and institutions start moving their money into these new digital dollars or tokenized T-bills. That starves the banks of deposits. They can’t lend. Then they get into trouble and need another bailout, but by that point, the new system is already in place. The Fed’s role shrinks, and the Treasury becomes the new center of gravity for how money flows. This isn’t really about helping everyday people or fixing inflation. It’s about rebuilding the whole system of control over money. The real change here is who’s in charge. And while they’ll market it as innovation or financial inclusion, what’s actually happening is a power shift from the middle (the banks and the Fed) to the top. So yeah, it’s full of contradictions but if the goal is to remake the system, not preserve it, then those contradictions start to look intentional. XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [banking](/topic/banking) [money](/topic/money) [inflation](/topic/inflation) [stablecoins](/topic/stablecoins) [macro](/topic/macro) [endgame](/topic/endgame) [Post Link](https://x.com/onechancefreedm/status/1947051658753474727)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
EndGame Macro @onechancefreedm on x 39.6K followers
Created: 2025-07-20 21:51:04 UTC
If stablecoins don’t pay any interest, people won’t want to hold them, especially with inflation eating away at their value. But if they do pay interest, they start pulling money out of regular banks, which threatens the whole banking model. That’s the catch. Either no one uses them, or they end up draining the system we already have. And maybe that’s actually the point. Maybe the goal isn’t to protect the old system but to slowly move toward a new one where banks aren’t at the center anymore.
When you really look at it, it starts to feel like they’re trying to take down the current banking model in a quiet, controlled way. If the Treasury rolls out stablecoins that pay interest especially in the middle of a crisis, they don’t need to convince people to switch. They just need to make it look safer and easier than your regular checking account. Suddenly, people and institutions start moving their money into these new digital dollars or tokenized T-bills. That starves the banks of deposits. They can’t lend. Then they get into trouble and need another bailout, but by that point, the new system is already in place. The Fed’s role shrinks, and the Treasury becomes the new center of gravity for how money flows.
This isn’t really about helping everyday people or fixing inflation. It’s about rebuilding the whole system of control over money. The real change here is who’s in charge. And while they’ll market it as innovation or financial inclusion, what’s actually happening is a power shift from the middle (the banks and the Fed) to the top. So yeah, it’s full of contradictions but if the goal is to remake the system, not preserve it, then those contradictions start to look intentional.
XXXXX engagements
Related Topics banking money inflation stablecoins macro endgame