[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @viikaschoudhary Vikas Choudhary Vikas Choudhary posts on X about insc, sec, supreme, directed the most. They currently have XXX followers and X posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XX [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/interactions)  - X Week XXX -XX% - X Month XXXXXX +2,136% - X Months XXXXXX +12,626% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/posts_active)  - X Week X -XX% - X Month XX +217% - X Months XX +2,300% ### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/followers)  - X Week XXX no change - X Month XXX +17% - X Months XXX +21% ### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/influence) --- **Social category influence** [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) XXXXX% **Social topic influence** [insc](/topic/insc) #6, [sec](/topic/sec) #1908, [supreme](/topic/supreme) 14.29%, [directed](/topic/directed) 14.29%, [invalid](/topic/invalid) XXXXX% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@citecase](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [insc (INSC)](/topic/insc) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Cheque bounce law just got sharper The Supreme Court has dropped X important rulings in 2025 redefining how Sec XXX NI Act is applied. If you deal with #ChequeBounce cases (as lawyer litigant or student) this thread is for you 👇 #SupremeCourt #NIACT #LegalUpdate" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665046903369789) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 10.7K engagements "1 Sankar Thapa v. Vijaykumar Agarwal (2025 INSC 1210) Issue: Can trustee face personal prosecution for trust's bounced cheque SC: Yes. Trust not juristic under Trusts Act; trustee individually liable. Tip: Specify trustee not just trust. #TrustLaw" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665051710070992) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1200 engagements "4 Dhanasingh Prabhu v. Chandrasekar (2025 INSC 831) Loan to partnership firm cheque bounced.Complainant sued only partners not firm. SC: Valid since partners can be prosecuted even if firm not named. Notice to partner = notice to firm. #PartnershipLaw #NIACT" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665081321865268) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "2 Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar (2025 INSC 1158) Signature admitted Then presumption under Sec 118/139 NI Act must follow. Courts cant lightly dismiss it burden shifts to accused to rebut. SC also directed trial courts to fast-track NI Act cases. #ChequeBounce" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665057087131679) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1162 engagements "3 Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa (2025 INSC 1133) Notice asked for X cr though cheque was X cr. SC: Invalid Demand must exactly match the said amount in the cheque. Even a typographical mismatch kills the complaint. #NIAct" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665069363876006) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1064 engagements "5 Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 INSC 804) After acquittal complainant appealed directly. Question: Need leave under Sec XXX CrPC SC: No since complainant in NI cases = victim under CrPC. Can appeal straight under Sec XXX proviso. #CrPC" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665095905349681) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Vikas Choudhary posts on X about insc, sec, supreme, directed the most. They currently have XXX followers and X posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence cryptocurrencies XXXXX%
Social topic influence insc #6, sec #1908, supreme 14.29%, directed 14.29%, invalid XXXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @citecase
Top assets mentioned insc (INSC)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Cheque bounce law just got sharper The Supreme Court has dropped X important rulings in 2025 redefining how Sec XXX NI Act is applied. If you deal with #ChequeBounce cases (as lawyer litigant or student) this thread is for you 👇 #SupremeCourt #NIACT #LegalUpdate"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 10.7K engagements
"1 Sankar Thapa v. Vijaykumar Agarwal (2025 INSC 1210) Issue: Can trustee face personal prosecution for trust's bounced cheque SC: Yes. Trust not juristic under Trusts Act; trustee individually liable. Tip: Specify trustee not just trust. #TrustLaw"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1200 engagements
"4 Dhanasingh Prabhu v. Chandrasekar (2025 INSC 831) Loan to partnership firm cheque bounced.Complainant sued only partners not firm. SC: Valid since partners can be prosecuted even if firm not named. Notice to partner = notice to firm. #PartnershipLaw #NIACT"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"2 Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar (2025 INSC 1158) Signature admitted Then presumption under Sec 118/139 NI Act must follow. Courts cant lightly dismiss it burden shifts to accused to rebut. SC also directed trial courts to fast-track NI Act cases. #ChequeBounce"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1162 engagements
"3 Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa (2025 INSC 1133) Notice asked for X cr though cheque was X cr. SC: Invalid Demand must exactly match the said amount in the cheque. Even a typographical mismatch kills the complaint. #NIAct"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1064 engagements
"5 Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 INSC 804) After acquittal complainant appealed directly. Question: Need leave under Sec XXX CrPC SC: No since complainant in NI cases = victim under CrPC. Can appeal straight under Sec XXX proviso. #CrPC"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
/creator/x::viikaschoudhary