[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

[@viikaschoudhary](/creator/twitter/viikaschoudhary)
"Cheque bounce law just got sharper The Supreme Court has dropped X important rulings in 2025 redefining how Sec XXX NI Act is applied. If you deal with #ChequeBounce cases (as lawyer litigant or student) this thread is for you 👇 #SupremeCourt #NIACT #LegalUpdate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665046903369789) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 10.7K engagements


"1 Sankar Thapa v. Vijaykumar Agarwal (2025 INSC 1210) Issue: Can trustee face personal prosecution for trust's bounced cheque SC: Yes. Trust not juristic under Trusts Act; trustee individually liable. Tip: Specify trustee not just trust. #TrustLaw"  
[X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665051710070992) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1200 engagements


"4 Dhanasingh Prabhu v. Chandrasekar (2025 INSC 831) Loan to partnership firm cheque bounced.Complainant sued only partners not firm. SC: Valid since partners can be prosecuted even if firm not named. Notice to partner = notice to firm. #PartnershipLaw #NIACT"  
[X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665081321865268) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"2 Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar (2025 INSC 1158) Signature admitted Then presumption under Sec 118/139 NI Act must follow. Courts cant lightly dismiss it burden shifts to accused to rebut. SC also directed trial courts to fast-track NI Act cases. #ChequeBounce"  
[X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665057087131679) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1162 engagements


"3 Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa (2025 INSC 1133) Notice asked for X cr though cheque was X cr. SC: Invalid Demand must exactly match the said amount in the cheque. Even a typographical mismatch kills the complaint. #NIAct"  
[X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665069363876006) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1064 engagements


"5 Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 INSC 804) After acquittal complainant appealed directly. Question: Need leave under Sec XXX CrPC SC: No since complainant in NI cases = victim under CrPC. Can appeal straight under Sec XXX proviso. #CrPC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665095905349681) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements