[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @viikaschoudhary Vikas Choudhary Vikas Choudhary posts on X about insc, sec, supreme, directed the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XX [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/interactions)  - X Week XXX -XX% - X Month XXXXXX +2,136% - X Months XXXXXX +12,626% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/posts_active)  - X Week X -XX% - X Month XX +217% - X Months XX +2,300% ### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/followers)  - X Week XXX no change - X Month XXX +17% - X Months XXX +21% ### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/influence) --- **Social category influence** [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) **Social topic influence** [insc](/topic/insc) #6, [sec](/topic/sec) #1908, [supreme](/topic/supreme), [directed](/topic/directed), [invalid](/topic/invalid) **Top assets mentioned** [insc (INSC)](/topic/insc) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::142297876/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Cheque bounce law just got sharper The Supreme Court has dropped X important rulings in 2025 redefining how Sec XXX NI Act is applied. If you deal with #ChequeBounce cases (as lawyer litigant or student) this thread is for you 👇 #SupremeCourt #NIACT #LegalUpdate" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665046903369789) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 10.7K engagements "1 Sankar Thapa v. Vijaykumar Agarwal (2025 INSC 1210) Issue: Can trustee face personal prosecution for trust's bounced cheque SC: Yes. Trust not juristic under Trusts Act; trustee individually liable. Tip: Specify trustee not just trust. #TrustLaw" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665051710070992) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1200 engagements "4 Dhanasingh Prabhu v. Chandrasekar (2025 INSC 831) Loan to partnership firm cheque bounced.Complainant sued only partners not firm. SC: Valid since partners can be prosecuted even if firm not named. Notice to partner = notice to firm. #PartnershipLaw #NIACT" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665081321865268) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "2 Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar (2025 INSC 1158) Signature admitted Then presumption under Sec 118/139 NI Act must follow. Courts cant lightly dismiss it burden shifts to accused to rebut. SC also directed trial courts to fast-track NI Act cases. #ChequeBounce" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665057087131679) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1162 engagements "3 Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa (2025 INSC 1133) Notice asked for X cr though cheque was X cr. SC: Invalid Demand must exactly match the said amount in the cheque. Even a typographical mismatch kills the complaint. #NIAct" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665069363876006) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1064 engagements "5 Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 INSC 804) After acquittal complainant appealed directly. Question: Need leave under Sec XXX CrPC SC: No since complainant in NI cases = victim under CrPC. Can appeal straight under Sec XXX proviso. #CrPC" [X Link](https://x.com/viikaschoudhary/status/1976665095905349681) [@viikaschoudhary](/creator/x/viikaschoudhary) 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Vikas Choudhary posts on X about insc, sec, supreme, directed the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence cryptocurrencies
Social topic influence insc #6, sec #1908, supreme, directed, invalid
Top assets mentioned insc (INSC)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Cheque bounce law just got sharper The Supreme Court has dropped X important rulings in 2025 redefining how Sec XXX NI Act is applied. If you deal with #ChequeBounce cases (as lawyer litigant or student) this thread is for you 👇 #SupremeCourt #NIACT #LegalUpdate"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 10.7K engagements
"1 Sankar Thapa v. Vijaykumar Agarwal (2025 INSC 1210) Issue: Can trustee face personal prosecution for trust's bounced cheque SC: Yes. Trust not juristic under Trusts Act; trustee individually liable. Tip: Specify trustee not just trust. #TrustLaw"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1200 engagements
"4 Dhanasingh Prabhu v. Chandrasekar (2025 INSC 831) Loan to partnership firm cheque bounced.Complainant sued only partners not firm. SC: Valid since partners can be prosecuted even if firm not named. Notice to partner = notice to firm. #PartnershipLaw #NIACT"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"2 Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar (2025 INSC 1158) Signature admitted Then presumption under Sec 118/139 NI Act must follow. Courts cant lightly dismiss it burden shifts to accused to rebut. SC also directed trial courts to fast-track NI Act cases. #ChequeBounce"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1162 engagements
"3 Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa (2025 INSC 1133) Notice asked for X cr though cheque was X cr. SC: Invalid Demand must exactly match the said amount in the cheque. Even a typographical mismatch kills the complaint. #NIAct"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, 1064 engagements
"5 Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 INSC 804) After acquittal complainant appealed directly. Question: Need leave under Sec XXX CrPC SC: No since complainant in NI cases = victim under CrPC. Can appeal straight under Sec XXX proviso. #CrPC"
X Link @viikaschoudhary 2025-10-10T15:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
/creator/twitter::viikaschoudhary