[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @rheaplex Rhea Myers Rhea Myers posts on X about namecoin, ethereum, fiat, ordinals the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1082221/interactions)  - X Month XXXXX +353% - X Months XXXXXX +2,895% - X Year XXXXXX -XX% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1082221/posts_active)  ### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1082221/followers)  - X Week XXXXX +0.13% - X Month XXXXX +0.23% - X Months XXXXX +0.42% - X Year XXXXX -XXXX% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1082221/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1082221/influence) --- **Social category influence** [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) [automotive brands](/list/automotive-brands) **Social topic influence** [namecoin](/topic/namecoin), [ethereum](/topic/ethereum), [fiat](/topic/fiat), [ordinals](/topic/ordinals), [mint](/topic/mint), [cryptocurrency](/topic/cryptocurrency), [nfts](/topic/nfts) **Top assets mentioned** [Ethereum (ETH)](/topic/ethereum) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1082221/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "@punk3606 This is all interesting philosophically (I mean this as a challenge to philosophy not a dismissal) but if the meaning of a name reduces to owner fiat then the original Quantum *still* doesn't exist on NameCoin any more"  [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1947705744008138767) 2025-07-22 17:10:10 UTC 8323 followers, XXX engagements "@punk3606 the UTXO set is the model of the world in Bitcoin-based systems. We can root other meanings in the chain's history Ordinals for example but *ownership* reduces to unspent transactions. Which in NameCoin expire"  [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1947704964119425413) 2025-07-22 17:07:04 UTC 8323 followers, XX engagements "@punk3606 That is a very well-researched and argued essay I still don't find the UTXO argument arbitrary *relative to Quantum and the codebase of Namecoin at the time* - there is nothing in that database that is not in the txes and the only way to affect the database is via txes"  [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1947703469600870676) 2025-07-22 17:01:08 UTC 8323 followers, XX engagements "If the property exists in the database regardless of consensus rules and the owner did not legally repudiate it then by their own argument the historic NameCoin bores are thieves. Play stupid games mint stupid prizes"  [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1947707868817559892) 2025-07-22 17:18:37 UTC 8323 followers, XXX engagements "@punk3606 There's a tension between the argument that NameCoin names are/were the first NFTs and the argument that the cryptocurrency aspect of NameCoin is incidental to names as crypto tokens. We can argue that the transaction history renders expired names abandoned property but"  [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1947704456709345376) 2025-07-22 17:05:03 UTC 8323 followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Rhea Myers posts on X about namecoin, ethereum, fiat, ordinals the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence cryptocurrencies automotive brands
Social topic influence namecoin, ethereum, fiat, ordinals, mint, cryptocurrency, nfts
Top assets mentioned Ethereum (ETH)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@punk3606 This is all interesting philosophically (I mean this as a challenge to philosophy not a dismissal) but if the meaning of a name reduces to owner fiat then the original Quantum still doesn't exist on NameCoin any more" @rheaplex on X 2025-07-22 17:10:10 UTC 8323 followers, XXX engagements
"@punk3606 the UTXO set is the model of the world in Bitcoin-based systems. We can root other meanings in the chain's history Ordinals for example but ownership reduces to unspent transactions. Which in NameCoin expire" @rheaplex on X 2025-07-22 17:07:04 UTC 8323 followers, XX engagements
"@punk3606 That is a very well-researched and argued essay I still don't find the UTXO argument arbitrary relative to Quantum and the codebase of Namecoin at the time - there is nothing in that database that is not in the txes and the only way to affect the database is via txes" @rheaplex on X 2025-07-22 17:01:08 UTC 8323 followers, XX engagements
"If the property exists in the database regardless of consensus rules and the owner did not legally repudiate it then by their own argument the historic NameCoin bores are thieves. Play stupid games mint stupid prizes" @rheaplex on X 2025-07-22 17:18:37 UTC 8323 followers, XXX engagements
"@punk3606 There's a tension between the argument that NameCoin names are/were the first NFTs and the argument that the cryptocurrency aspect of NameCoin is incidental to names as crypto tokens. We can argue that the transaction history renders expired names abandoned property but" @rheaplex on X 2025-07-22 17:05:03 UTC 8323 followers, XX engagements
/creator/x::rheaplex