[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

[@rheaplex](/creator/twitter/rheaplex)
"@punk3606 This is all interesting philosophically (I mean this as a challenge to philosophy not a dismissal) but if the meaning of a name reduces to owner fiat then the original Quantum *still* doesn't exist on NameCoin any more"  
![@rheaplex Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1082221.png) [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1947705744008138767) 2025-07-22 17:10:10 UTC 8328 followers, XXX engagements


"@punk3606 the UTXO set is the model of the world in Bitcoin-based systems. We can root other meanings in the chain's history Ordinals for example but *ownership* reduces to unspent transactions. Which in NameCoin expire"  
![@rheaplex Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1082221.png) [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1947704964119425413) 2025-07-22 17:07:04 UTC 8329 followers, XXX engagements


"@punk3606 That is a very well-researched and argued essay I still don't find the UTXO argument arbitrary *relative to Quantum and the codebase of Namecoin at the time* - there is nothing in that database that is not in the txes and the only way to affect the database is via txes"  
![@rheaplex Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1082221.png) [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1947703469600870676) 2025-07-22 17:01:08 UTC 8328 followers, XX engagements


"I think NameCoin's ontology is its txouts. This is an unpopular opinion because people want its ontology to be its database which is essentially a cache. 🤷♀"  
![@rheaplex Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1082221.png) [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1948925535788433475) 2025-07-26 01:57:11 UTC 8328 followers, XXX engagements


"If the property exists in the database regardless of consensus rules and the owner did not legally repudiate it then by their own argument the historic NameCoin bores are thieves. Play stupid games mint stupid prizes"  
![@rheaplex Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1082221.png) [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1947707868817559892) 2025-07-22 17:18:37 UTC 8329 followers, XXX engagements


"I don't give a shit about validity my bones will crumble if I don't get HRT"  
![@rheaplex Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1082221.png) [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1948433685495382330) 2025-07-24 17:22:45 UTC 8329 followers, XXX engagements


"@matdryhurst I simply lose all productivity to anxiety. I don't recommend it"  
![@rheaplex Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1082221.png) [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1948226740905803828) 2025-07-24 03:40:25 UTC 8328 followers, XXX engagements


"@punk3606 There's a tension between the argument that NameCoin names are/were the first NFTs and the argument that the cryptocurrency aspect of NameCoin is incidental to names as crypto tokens. We can argue that the transaction history renders expired names abandoned property but"  
![@rheaplex Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1082221.png) [@rheaplex](/creator/x/rheaplex) on [X](/post/tweet/1947704456709345376) 2025-07-22 17:05:03 UTC 8328 followers, XX engagements