[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] [@Farrell1969](/creator/twitter/Farrell1969) "@jchervinsky And no issue w DOJ not giving blanket immunity to someone who apparently has not gone through the immunity dance of proffer etc w/ the assurances that if there is one lie all can be used. That way DOJ knows what it is "paying for.""  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948865784698347846) 2025-07-25 21:59:45 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@MetaLawMan @realDonaldTrump @rstormsf By that logic neither is DAG Blanche and his office that reviewed the charges + evidence and green lit it's continuance"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948895490206302431) 2025-07-25 23:57:48 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@mopar75028 @aziz0505152048 @Trey5610 @bgarlinghouse And to be clear - it's not "accounting errors" or "some paperwork.". Company bought shares in its name. Never transferred shares to SPVs as told investors it did. So when filed it was record owner of all shares and all shares are therefore assets of the bankruptcy estate"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1947820020005810459) 2025-07-23 00:44:16 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@Bill_Fowler_ Are the average Bitcoin miners transmitting funds they know to be the proceeds of illegal activities X of X elements does not a crime make"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948572479825272843) 2025-07-25 02:34:16 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@sentosumosaba They are selected by the US Trustees Office (part of DOJ) following interviews. Generally from pool of largest unsecured creditors bc presumably they have most skin in the game"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948164281134170140) 2025-07-23 23:32:14 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements "@MetaLawMan @realDonaldTrump @rstormsf You can argue whether this prosecution belongs in the former or latter bucket but the DAG thought it was the latter"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948896136917336232) 2025-07-26 00:00:22 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@iampaulgrewal @coinbase You know that "we are not a target" - meaning DOJ did not issue a target letter in the typical X mins before indictment - is different from "investigation closed - no wrongdoing here.""  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948881074723193233) 2025-07-25 23:00:31 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@jchervinsky @A_Life_Shared DAG Todd Blanche reviewed the evidence and determined that the case should go forward (with X change of theory). So answer likely that he thought consistent with his dictate to pursue charges against those who assist criminal activity & not the unwitting platforms used"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948160733444776199) 2025-07-23 23:18:08 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@McduffieXrp @LindaPJones @datruthhuts @baggins_cc @ScamDetective5 But if you want to take the money in a highly regulated industry you have to take also the responsibilities that comes along with it. Putting "DYOR" and "not financial advice" doesn't suffice. And if f you think that's your get out of jail free card expensive lesson"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1947012348188709170) 2025-07-20 19:14:52 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@iampaulgrewal @coinbase No argument that neither SDNY Judge Failla nor Brian Klein acted fast enuf to say "put under seal" or ask for in camera on the defense request. But as to substance no one knows the facts so how can you say a travesty Crypto investors have stepped over line in portcos"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948880540813169011) 2025-07-25 22:58:24 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements "@0xAnthraX @_Enoch @tayvano_ He did not operate the business Was it just the other X co founders who hired people paid bills solicited and received VC funding and did any of the normal other XXX things associated with running a business Why did he get $12M+ of the tokens Charity to random bystander"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1947883537103045031) 2025-07-23 04:56:39 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@mopar75028 @aziz0505152048 @Trey5610 @bgarlinghouse If the K-1s were incorrect then it just might be like the Madoff account statements - if you are going to be out criming go big or go home"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1947819396610527493) 2025-07-23 00:41:47 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@Bill_Fowler_ Since the only transmission of someone else's funds would be the BTC mined on behalf of the users who signed the TOS underwent the KYC and AML checks and as part of AML Bitdeer would monitor tranx why would it fear prosecution I'm missing the parade of horribles here"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948827377943122194) 2025-07-25 19:27:09 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@Simonpilot456 @Stuart_Alderoty Part of the issue arises from Ripple's characterizations. Most people experienced with the process would say "SEC staff agreed to recommend to C dropping appeal" or similar to convey the contingent/future action requirement (as CB did when saying agreemt w/ staff to dismiss)"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1947346916355838282) 2025-07-21 17:24:19 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements "@econoalchemist @frankcorva @SenatorHagerty @SDNYnews Again - neither did Tornado Cash and Judge Failla held that custody is not required because - among other reasons - the word "custody" is not used in the law and there have been other "inventive" criminal schemes which tried to raise similar arguments unsuccessfully"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1947841197789065674) 2025-07-23 02:08:25 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@jchervinsky In fairness no one knows what all the facts are. And VCs have taken X for their activities "funding and supporting" crypto companies (see Jump + Terra). I have X issue with anyone wanting immunity if any chance of liability if truthful (no matter how small)"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948865037734740454) 2025-07-25 21:56:47 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@MetaLawMan @realDonaldTrump @rstormsf Maybe as the Blanche memo stated the admin believes we can accomplish that goal by not criminalizing regulatory foot faults but still not tolerate fraud or facilitation of funding for enemies that hate us"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948895923054280964) 2025-07-25 23:59:31 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@Bill_Fowler_ Mining and transmitting are entirely different businesses. If you read the no action letter FinCEN issued (not the guidance) you will see how each of the activities conducted by a miner is separately analyzed"  [@Farrell1969](/creator/x/Farrell1969) on [X](/post/tweet/1948816170993303769) 2025-07-25 18:42:37 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@Farrell1969
"@jchervinsky And no issue w DOJ not giving blanket immunity to someone who apparently has not gone through the immunity dance of proffer etc w/ the assurances that if there is one lie all can be used. That way DOJ knows what it is "paying for.""
@Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-25 21:59:45 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@MetaLawMan @realDonaldTrump @rstormsf By that logic neither is DAG Blanche and his office that reviewed the charges + evidence and green lit it's continuance" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-25 23:57:48 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@mopar75028 @aziz0505152048 @Trey5610 @bgarlinghouse And to be clear - it's not "accounting errors" or "some paperwork.". Company bought shares in its name. Never transferred shares to SPVs as told investors it did. So when filed it was record owner of all shares and all shares are therefore assets of the bankruptcy estate" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-23 00:44:16 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@Bill_Fowler_ Are the average Bitcoin miners transmitting funds they know to be the proceeds of illegal activities X of X elements does not a crime make" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-25 02:34:16 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@sentosumosaba They are selected by the US Trustees Office (part of DOJ) following interviews. Generally from pool of largest unsecured creditors bc presumably they have most skin in the game" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-23 23:32:14 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@MetaLawMan @realDonaldTrump @rstormsf You can argue whether this prosecution belongs in the former or latter bucket but the DAG thought it was the latter" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-26 00:00:22 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@iampaulgrewal @coinbase You know that "we are not a target" - meaning DOJ did not issue a target letter in the typical X mins before indictment - is different from "investigation closed - no wrongdoing here."" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-25 23:00:31 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@jchervinsky @A_Life_Shared DAG Todd Blanche reviewed the evidence and determined that the case should go forward (with X change of theory). So answer likely that he thought consistent with his dictate to pursue charges against those who assist criminal activity & not the unwitting platforms used" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-23 23:18:08 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@McduffieXrp @LindaPJones @datruthhuts @baggins_cc @ScamDetective5 But if you want to take the money in a highly regulated industry you have to take also the responsibilities that comes along with it. Putting "DYOR" and "not financial advice" doesn't suffice. And if f you think that's your get out of jail free card expensive lesson" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-20 19:14:52 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@iampaulgrewal @coinbase No argument that neither SDNY Judge Failla nor Brian Klein acted fast enuf to say "put under seal" or ask for in camera on the defense request. But as to substance no one knows the facts so how can you say a travesty Crypto investors have stepped over line in portcos" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-25 22:58:24 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@0xAnthraX @Enoch @tayvano He did not operate the business Was it just the other X co founders who hired people paid bills solicited and received VC funding and did any of the normal other XXX things associated with running a business Why did he get $12M+ of the tokens Charity to random bystander" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-23 04:56:39 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@mopar75028 @aziz0505152048 @Trey5610 @bgarlinghouse If the K-1s were incorrect then it just might be like the Madoff account statements - if you are going to be out criming go big or go home" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-23 00:41:47 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@Bill_Fowler_ Since the only transmission of someone else's funds would be the BTC mined on behalf of the users who signed the TOS underwent the KYC and AML checks and as part of AML Bitdeer would monitor tranx why would it fear prosecution I'm missing the parade of horribles here" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-25 19:27:09 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@Simonpilot456 @Stuart_Alderoty Part of the issue arises from Ripple's characterizations. Most people experienced with the process would say "SEC staff agreed to recommend to C dropping appeal" or similar to convey the contingent/future action requirement (as CB did when saying agreemt w/ staff to dismiss)" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-21 17:24:19 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@econoalchemist @frankcorva @SenatorHagerty @SDNYnews Again - neither did Tornado Cash and Judge Failla held that custody is not required because - among other reasons - the word "custody" is not used in the law and there have been other "inventive" criminal schemes which tried to raise similar arguments unsuccessfully" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-23 02:08:25 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@jchervinsky In fairness no one knows what all the facts are. And VCs have taken X for their activities "funding and supporting" crypto companies (see Jump + Terra). I have X issue with anyone wanting immunity if any chance of liability if truthful (no matter how small)" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-25 21:56:47 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@MetaLawMan @realDonaldTrump @rstormsf Maybe as the Blanche memo stated the admin believes we can accomplish that goal by not criminalizing regulatory foot faults but still not tolerate fraud or facilitation of funding for enemies that hate us" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-25 23:59:31 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@Bill_Fowler_ Mining and transmitting are entirely different businesses. If you read the no action letter FinCEN issued (not the guidance) you will see how each of the activities conducted by a miner is separately analyzed" @Farrell1969 on X 2025-07-25 18:42:37 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements