Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) @XperimentApp XperimentApp

XperimentApp posts on X about egld, $egld, coins, mainnet the most. They currently have XX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1751266892440817664/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXX -XXXX%
- X Months XXXXXX +4,457%
- X Year XXXXXX +4,921%

### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1751266892440817664/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XX +288%
- X Months XX +2,467%
- X Year XX +2,567%

### Followers: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1751266892440817664/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XX +1.10%
- X Month XX +42%
- X Months XX +309%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1751266892440817664/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1751266892440817664/influence)
---

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  XXXXX% [finance](/list/finance)  XXXX%

**Social topic influence**
[egld](/topic/egld) 44.44%, [$egld](/topic/$egld) 44.44%, [coins](/topic/coins) 11.11%, [mainnet](/topic/mainnet) 5.56%, [tvl](/topic/tvl) 5.56%, [onchain](/topic/onchain) 5.56%, [sui](/topic/sui) 5.56%, [money](/topic/money) 5.56%, [mcap](/topic/mcap) 5.56%, [$sui](/topic/$sui) XXXX%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@multiversx](/creator/undefined) [@theeconomystic](/creator/undefined) [@axelar](/creator/undefined) [@the_economystic](/creator/undefined) [@onedexx](/creator/undefined) [@wdrewcurry](/creator/undefined) [@onefinitychain](/creator/undefined) [@xcountries](/creator/undefined) [@lucianmincu](/creator/undefined) [@sasurobert](/creator/undefined) [@dbcrypt0](/creator/undefined) [@davyegld](/creator/undefined) [@solvercs](/creator/undefined) [@axlecosystem](/creator/undefined) [@houseofchimera](/creator/undefined) [@bittensor](/creator/undefined) [@dfinity](/creator/undefined) [@rendernetwork](/creator/undefined) [@filecoin](/creator/undefined) [@thetanetwork](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[MultiversX (EGLD)](/topic/$egld) [Sui (SUI)](/topic/$sui) [USDC (USDC)](/topic/usdc) [Bittensor (TAO)](/topic/$tao)
### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1751266892440817664/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Among the X listed choices I think it's closer to "Onchain TVL increase". "Mainnet upgrades" for me sounds like core features (which are good but unrelated to connectivity to "the world") Low TVL = bad trading experience (high price impact). Also Low TVL = Low volumes and fees = less revenue for many projects. Lack of seamless bridges is what I believe to be the root cause for Low TVL"  
![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) [@XperimentApp](/creator/x/XperimentApp) on [X](/post/tweet/1947469391458644154) 2025-07-22 01:30:59 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements


"Step 2/5: determine the $ value of $EGLD LPs: 13668824 * $XXXXX * X = $447790674 The multiplication by X is needed because LP tokens in AMMs have by design twice as big $ value as the coin/token's value inside the liquidity pools"  
![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) [@XperimentApp](/creator/x/XperimentApp) on [X](/post/tweet/1949280227059737002) 2025-07-27 01:26:36 UTC XX followers, XX engagements


"1/ Four days ago I made a very simplistic assumption that $SUI and $EGLD each had XX% of MCap in LPs. Since then: $SUI +21% while $EGLD +8%. Under my assumption for that to happen $SUI had to have 56x more net inflows than $EGLD. To grow $EGLD needs bigger money inflows"  
![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) [@XperimentApp](/creator/x/XperimentApp) on [X](/post/tweet/1945459955231801534) 2025-07-16 12:26:12 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements


"This is my quick and dirty attempt to answer @xCountries' question (see linked thread below). Step 1/5: determine the amount of $EGLD in LPs. We'll use the most conservative # equal to "all of the non-staked $EGLD coins". As of now that is: 28479001 - 14810177 = 13668824"  
![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) [@XperimentApp](/creator/x/XperimentApp) on [X](/post/tweet/1949280224086003954) 2025-07-27 01:26:35 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements


"@the_economystic @MultiversX @axelar @axelar @Axl_Ecosystem when should we the citizens of #MultiversX expect your arrival I know it's SOON(tm) but when πŸ˜‰πŸ˜Š"  
![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) [@XperimentApp](/creator/x/XperimentApp) on [X](/post/tweet/1947472705977987216) 2025-07-22 01:44:10 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements


"Step 3/5: check the amount of "new buys" to see if that much is even available: 100000 people * XXX $EGLD each = 10000000 $EGLD buying pressure (totally unrealistic to believe almost the entire non-staked supply would be bought just like that but let's ignore it for now)"  
![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) [@XperimentApp](/creator/x/XperimentApp) on [X](/post/tweet/1949280229043634542) 2025-07-27 01:26:37 UTC XX followers, XX engagements


"Fantasizing a bit what if LPs amount was 10x smaller In such case (link below) we would get a ginormous increase indeedπŸš€ In summary under the given assumptions $EGLD price would jump to a value between $XXXXX and $1126.78😍 Ok that was fun 🫑"  
![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) [@XperimentApp](/creator/x/XperimentApp) on [X](/post/tweet/1949280235473486200) 2025-07-27 01:26:38 UTC XX followers, XX engagements


"@HouseofChimera @bittensor_ @dfinity @rendernetwork @Filecoin @Theta_Network @BitTorrent @helium @MultiversX $EGLD / @MultiversX (which btw also has a bridge to $TAO)"  
![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) [@XperimentApp](/creator/x/XperimentApp) on [X](/post/tweet/1947473496638107897) 2025-07-22 01:47:18 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements


"Step 4/5: determine the $ value of $EGLD "new buys": 10000000 EGLD * $XXXXX = $163800000 That's a big $ amount but for crypto if #MultiversX becomes appealing to US investors/businesses it's more than realistic imo"  
![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) [@XperimentApp](/creator/x/XperimentApp) on [X](/post/tweet/1949280230931091725) 2025-07-27 01:26:37 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements


"Step 5/5: determine the price impact using the AMMs constant product formula either using Excel Grok or my Grok-generated website: I find this hard to believe: price would only increase by 3x🀨 But the reality is that much less $EGLD in inside LPs"  
![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) [@XperimentApp](/creator/x/XperimentApp) on [X](/post/tweet/1949280232977879417) 2025-07-27 01:26:38 UTC XX followers, XX engagements


"@xPortalApp can manage multiple wallets (thank you) but it looks like setting a #herotag is only supported for the main wallet. But Grok told me about this tool which worked flawlessly for me😍 I'm now exploring what other goodies their site offers"  
![@XperimentApp Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1751266892440817664.png) [@XperimentApp](/creator/x/XperimentApp) on [X](/post/tweet/1949264865219981568) 2025-07-27 00:25:34 UTC XX followers, X engagements

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp XperimentApp

XperimentApp posts on X about egld, $egld, coins, mainnet the most. They currently have XX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXX #

Engagements Line Chart

  • X Week XXXXX -XX%
  • X Month XXXXXX -XXXX%
  • X Months XXXXXX +4,457%
  • X Year XXXXXX +4,921%

Mentions: X #

Mentions Line Chart

  • X Week XX -XX%
  • X Month XX +288%
  • X Months XX +2,467%
  • X Year XX +2,567%

Followers: XX #

Followers Line Chart

  • X Week XX +1.10%
  • X Month XX +42%
  • X Months XX +309%

CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #


Social category influence cryptocurrencies XXXXX% finance XXXX%

Social topic influence egld 44.44%, $egld 44.44%, coins 11.11%, mainnet 5.56%, tvl 5.56%, onchain 5.56%, sui 5.56%, money 5.56%, mcap 5.56%, $sui XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @multiversx @theeconomystic @axelar @the_economystic @onedexx @wdrewcurry @onefinitychain @xcountries @lucianmincu @sasurobert @dbcrypt0 @davyegld @solvercs @axlecosystem @houseofchimera @bittensor @dfinity @rendernetwork @filecoin @thetanetwork

Top assets mentioned MultiversX (EGLD) Sui (SUI) USDC (USDC) Bittensor (TAO)

Top Social Posts #


Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Among the X listed choices I think it's closer to "Onchain TVL increase". "Mainnet upgrades" for me sounds like core features (which are good but unrelated to connectivity to "the world") Low TVL = bad trading experience (high price impact). Also Low TVL = Low volumes and fees = less revenue for many projects. Lack of seamless bridges is what I believe to be the root cause for Low TVL"
@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp on X 2025-07-22 01:30:59 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements

"Step 2/5: determine the $ value of $EGLD LPs: 13668824 * $XXXXX * X = $447790674 The multiplication by X is needed because LP tokens in AMMs have by design twice as big $ value as the coin/token's value inside the liquidity pools"
@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp on X 2025-07-27 01:26:36 UTC XX followers, XX engagements

"1/ Four days ago I made a very simplistic assumption that $SUI and $EGLD each had XX% of MCap in LPs. Since then: $SUI +21% while $EGLD +8%. Under my assumption for that to happen $SUI had to have 56x more net inflows than $EGLD. To grow $EGLD needs bigger money inflows"
@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp on X 2025-07-16 12:26:12 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements

"This is my quick and dirty attempt to answer @xCountries' question (see linked thread below). Step 1/5: determine the amount of $EGLD in LPs. We'll use the most conservative # equal to "all of the non-staked $EGLD coins". As of now that is: 28479001 - 14810177 = 13668824"
@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp on X 2025-07-27 01:26:35 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements

"@the_economystic @MultiversX @axelar @axelar @Axl_Ecosystem when should we the citizens of #MultiversX expect your arrival I know it's SOON(tm) but when πŸ˜‰πŸ˜Š"
@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp on X 2025-07-22 01:44:10 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements

"Step 3/5: check the amount of "new buys" to see if that much is even available: 100000 people * XXX $EGLD each = 10000000 $EGLD buying pressure (totally unrealistic to believe almost the entire non-staked supply would be bought just like that but let's ignore it for now)"
@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp on X 2025-07-27 01:26:37 UTC XX followers, XX engagements

"Fantasizing a bit what if LPs amount was 10x smaller In such case (link below) we would get a ginormous increase indeedπŸš€ In summary under the given assumptions $EGLD price would jump to a value between $XXXXX and $1126.78😍 Ok that was fun 🫑"
@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp on X 2025-07-27 01:26:38 UTC XX followers, XX engagements

"@HouseofChimera @bittensor_ @dfinity @rendernetwork @Filecoin @Theta_Network @BitTorrent @helium @MultiversX $EGLD / @MultiversX (which btw also has a bridge to $TAO)"
@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp on X 2025-07-22 01:47:18 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements

"Step 4/5: determine the $ value of $EGLD "new buys": 10000000 EGLD * $XXXXX = $163800000 That's a big $ amount but for crypto if #MultiversX becomes appealing to US investors/businesses it's more than realistic imo"
@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp on X 2025-07-27 01:26:37 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements

"Step 5/5: determine the price impact using the AMMs constant product formula either using Excel Grok or my Grok-generated website: I find this hard to believe: price would only increase by 3x🀨 But the reality is that much less $EGLD in inside LPs"
@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp on X 2025-07-27 01:26:38 UTC XX followers, XX engagements

"@xPortalApp can manage multiple wallets (thank you) but it looks like setting a #herotag is only supported for the main wallet. But Grok told me about this tool which worked flawlessly for me😍 I'm now exploring what other goodies their site offers"
@XperimentApp Avatar @XperimentApp on X 2025-07-27 00:25:34 UTC XX followers, X engagements

@XperimentApp
/creator/twitter::XperimentApp