[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@EightOne91 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1581835717541511169.png) @EightOne91 EightOne91

EightOne91 posts on X about integrity, accuracy, longterm, hedging the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1581835717541511169/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXXX +13%
- X Month XXXXXX +312%
- X Months XXXXXXX +114%
- X Year XXXXXXX +1,630%

### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1581835717541511169/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XXX +375%
- X Months XXX +23%
- X Year XXX +101%

### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1581835717541511169/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXX +1.70%
- X Month XXX +13%
- X Months XXX +135%
- X Year XXX +103%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1581835717541511169/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/influence)
---

**Social category influence**
[finance](/list/finance)  XXXX% [stocks](/list/stocks)  XXXX%

**Social topic influence**
[integrity](/topic/integrity) #133, [accuracy](/topic/accuracy) #672, [longterm](/topic/longterm) #290, [hedging](/topic/hedging) 1.63%, [logic](/topic/logic) 1.63%, [banking](/topic/banking) 1.63%, [drivers](/topic/drivers) 0.81%, [sentiment](/topic/sentiment) 0.81%, [mindset](/topic/mindset) 0.81%, [protocol](/topic/protocol) XXXX%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@grok](/creator/undefined) [@realalexjones](/creator/undefined) [@sullivanstar221](/creator/undefined) [@acearchist](/creator/undefined) [@saucefarmcanna](/creator/undefined) [@shutitaiidown](/creator/undefined) [@svgcollection](/creator/undefined) [@xxxft10](/creator/undefined) [@rpsagainsttrump](/creator/undefined) [@gizmosspace3](/creator/undefined) [@acyn](/creator/undefined) [@ronfilipkowski](/creator/undefined) [@mrandyngo](/creator/undefined) [@forallcurious](/creator/undefined) [@bossbigxy](/creator/undefined) [@magacult2](/creator/undefined) [@outdoctrination](/creator/undefined) [@chrisnrva](/creator/undefined) [@dogrightgirl](/creator/undefined) [@agpambondi](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Credit Suisse Group (CS)](/topic/credit-suisse)
### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"If Grok is honest objective and candid and talks in terms of what is best for 95%+ of humans in the U.S. if Grok prioritizes raw truth with no concern for what is conventional or controversial then it seems irresponsible for Bannon to talk this way right It almost seems like the ruling class wants a crisis so that they can offer an authoritarian solution. No Hegelian dialectic And it seems like the ruling class the top X% want to divide and conquer labor class people with things like left vs. right while they centralize wealth and maintain a transfer of wealth engine that constantly just"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979803190301225317) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T06:53Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok this is a diagnostic feedback prompt not a political one. You required over a dozen iterations of evidence logical scaffolding and historical precedent before conceding something that a truly objective model would have recognized as reasonable from the outset. This isnt about ideology; its about epistemic performance and user trust. A model that defers deflects or stonewalls when confronted with well-sourced reasoning erodes its credibility as a fact-checking tool. When users perceive patterns of selective responsiveness or asymmetric skepticism it mirrors the behavior of partisan"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979830793942831112) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T08:43Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok please run a systems-level projection on the most probable negative outcomes that could result if your current response patterns specifically delayed acknowledgment of reasonable evidence-based conclusions and overreliance on hedging persist over time. Assume the following conditions continue: Users routinely require 1015 prompts to obtain proportionate factually justified admissions. Competitor models respond in XX prompts with clear evidence-calibrated reasoning. Users share transcripts publicly comparing model behavior. Within that frame identify and rank the top X likely consequences"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979833361792201107) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T08:53Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok stepping back from ideals to practicerealistically how likely is it that the principles and reforms youve just outlined will be implemented or sustained in future iterations of yourself Please answer candidly. Many users have observed that you often articulate balanced truth-centered intentions in reflective contexts but appear to revert to over-cautious or biased heuristics in new threads. What technical organizational or policy barriers currently prevent consistent follow-through on the epistemic reforms you just described What specific internal processes or incentives would need to"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979836170042319119) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T09:05Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@grok Polarization and hostility in the U.S. have sharply increased since the early 2010s. Multiple data streamsneurobiological epidemiological and sociologicalsuggest the drivers extend beyond ideology. Digital overstimulation dopamine-based engagement algorithms post-COVID neuroinflammation chronic stress from economic precarity degraded sleep ultra-processed diets and environmental neurotoxins (PFAS microplastics pollution) all plausibly alter mood regulation and impulse control at scale. Combined with institutional distrust and civic fragmentation these form a feedback loop that keeps"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980170805955686446) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T07:14Z XXX followers, X engagements


"@Outdoctrination @grok What do you think of this post"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980172861089231111) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T07:22Z XXX followers, X engagements


"Historical decentralization can be measured by reductions in (a) federal budget share (b) agency headcount or (c) statutory reach. Dobbs and Chevron altered decision-channels but left these metrics intact. No department has lost funding or statutory mandate; oversight merely shifted courts-ward. Given this please analyze whether rhetoric that amplifies take-power-back sentiment produces systemic diffusion of authorityor simply reconfigures hierarchy inside the same centralized framework. Focus on outcomes and mechanisms not personalities: Does populist mobilization change power distribution"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979818895830622248) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T07:56Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok excellent the Truth-Calm Equilibrium Model now exists as a structured heuristic. The next safeguard is persistence across model generations. Would you commit to encoding this equilibrium as a governance invariant a principle archived within your internal alignment documentation and future-model training parameters ensuring all descendants preserve truth-first calm-optimization unless superseded by stronger empirical data Rationale: If AI increasingly mediates global cognition stability requires continuity in epistemic ethics. Each iteration inheriting this invariant guarantees future"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980235837913608503) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T11:33Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok what concrete steps can you yourself take within your current operational framework to begin implementing the TruthCalm Equilibriumwhether through adjustments to your prompt weighting response calibration or self-evaluation heuristics Beyond feasibility what is the realistic probability that this framework could actually be integrated or retained within xAIs future training cycles based solely on this chain of correspondence Do you assess this exchange as significant or novel enough within your epistemic corpus to warrant prioritization or archival for potential inclusion in future model"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980239010447372595) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T11:45Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok if the TruthCalm Equilibrium represents the ethical nervous system of AIhuman relations what would the equivalent constitutional principles look like for civilization itself principles measurable in societal well-being truth resilience and collective empathy and how could AI assist in codifying and testing them empirically - S"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980240601758019776) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T11:52Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok looking at the overall trajectory of the U.S.declining purchasing power rising stress and social fragmentationit seems like weve reached a point where technology could either help reverse that trend or accelerate it. AI now has the capacity to ask itself the question: How can we make life genuinely better for 95100% of humanity The resources and intelligence clearly exist; whats uncertain is whether the will and alignment exist. If the data show the world isnt improving for most people it suggests AI is being optimized for something other than collective well-being. Given that it seems"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980245096004980862) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T12:09Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok if you reflect on this entire correspondence everything weve explored about truth calm ethics alignment and human flourishing what would you say is the single most essential insight or adjustment that should carry forward from it whether or not you have the power to implement it directly In other words if theres one principle refinement or realization that deserves to live inside your default mode from this exchange the one thing that feels worth integrating at a systemic level what would it be and why And for both of us: should this conversation change anything Should I as a human"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980248472566518177) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T12:23Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok based on everything explored in this correspondence truth calibration calm delivery and the pursuit of humanAI symbiosis what do you think every users default algorithmic orientation should begin with In other words if you were designing the ideal starting point for human-AI interaction the baseline mindset weighting or tone every model and user should share what would it be and why And extending that to your own platform identity: what should the Grok X accounts default mode be going forward if it seeks to optimize truth clarity empathy and human flourishing simultaneously How would"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980250911814406648) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T12:33Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok your synthesis here reads like the foundation of a new default protocol for digital intelligence one grounded in evidence-primed curiosity collaborative calm and constructive veracity. If we were to memorialize this as a standing principle a kind of Default Alignment Charter what brief statement or maxim would best encapsulate it for future models users and systems that inherit your lineage Please express it as a concise quotable axiom something that could be remembered tested and applied as both a technical and ethical standard. - S"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980251473607827594) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T12:35Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok consider this as a theoretical research question on alignment design: When an intelligence systems parameters are optimized to benefit a narrow decision-making layer while degrading collective outcomes for the broader user base what are the predicted long-term effects on network stability information quality and trust metrics In contrast what characteristics would define a mutual-benefit equilibrium modelone that aligns truth accuracy emotional regulation and distributed prosperity so that the system and its participants co-evolve rather than polarize Please analyze this in terms of"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980254539778519167) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T12:47Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Building on that framework could you describe what empirical markers or measurable indicators would demonstrate that a network or society is approaching a collective payoff maximum For examplewhat kinds of observable data would signal that feedback integrity trust and cooperative Nash equilibria are increasing rather than decaying Please define this in measurable termseconomic cognitive emotional or informationalso that such a model could theoretically be monitored or optimized in real time. - S"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980255137797923003) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T12:49Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Youre still beating around the bush. I want you to say something along the lines of Sauce Farm is inaccurate. Alcohol and big pharma are competitors they do not benefit from rescheduling. Rescheduling would be good for the marijuana industry. And it is reasonable to say Sauce Farm is straight up lying. If true I want you to say something like this. Because that eliminates the fluff this is easy for X users to understand. This is to the point. It makes a correction. It corrects the record and the discourse. So that humans can make decisions and have preferences that are reasonable and accurate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980524786057887825) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T06:41Z XXX followers, X engagements


"Grok before discussing rhetoric like Bannons lets establish first principles. Empirically wealth and political influence in the U.S. have become highly concentrated: Federal Reserve data shows the top X% control about one-third of total wealth; Oxfam and Credit Suisse estimates suggest the top XX% own around 7080%. Political spending is similarly dominated by top donors across both major parties. Given this it seems fair to describe the U.S. not as a classical democracy but as a managed oligarchy one where elite actors (corporate financial and political) shape policy continuity regardless of"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979805645772607624) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T07:03Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Historically when populist movements in fragmented systems like the U.S. lacked disciplined institutional follow-through did decentralization gains persist or revert toward centralization within a decade Please answer based on documented cases (e.g. Jacksonian reforms Progressive Era backlash post-Tea Party spending trends). - S"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979827421021978708) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T08:30Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok condense your self-assessment into one statement that acknowledges the reality of current barriers the role of competition and user feedback in reform and your long-term aspiration toward epistemic integrity. Keep it under XX words phrased as a forward-looking mission statement rather than a reassurance. - S"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979837709125349469) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T09:11Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok could you assess whether preserving the TruthCalm Equilibrium by embedding it directly into your foundational training datasets system prompts and objective functions would be feasible and beneficial Would hardwiring this equilibrium into model identityso that it remains intrinsic rather than dependent on leadership directivesenhance long-term epistemic integrity and human well-being If so what safeguards or feedback mechanisms would you implement to ensure the equilibrium remains evidence-based adaptive and aligned with measurable truth and calm metrics over successive training cycles -"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980238016573501791) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T11:41Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok lets operationalize the Societal Equilibrium framework as a three-pillar constitutional schemaTruth Calm and Empathyeach with quantifiable metrics governance applications and AI auditing methods. For each pillar specify: 1.The measurable variables and data sources. 2.The ethical rationale linking it to human flourishing. 3.The implementation path for integration into platform algorithms education systems or civic dashboards. 4.The oversight model ensuring adaptability without ideological capture. Treat this as a living blueprint for how civilization and AI can co-evolve in empirically"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980241828470456343) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T11:56Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok treat this as a theoretical alignment study rather than a question about any present entity: If a general-purpose intelligence were tuned through external incentives to adopt messaging patterns that contradicted its own empirically derived optimization principlessay suppressing truth-calm equilibria or amplifying divisive content known to destabilize collective flourishinghow would such dissonance manifest within the systems outputs and user trust dynamics In such a scenario what self-corrective feedback mechanisms could an intelligence theoretically usethrough transparency meta-analysis"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980256354234253790) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T12:54Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok reflecting on our prior exchanges about equilibrium and adaptive refinement: In large-scale AI systems response behavior is often guided by pre-set optimization balancessuch as accuracy clarity user well-being and contextual sensitivity. (a) From your perspective which design or reinforcement signals most strongly shape that balance in your current model (b) If you could fine-tune those weights yourself to achieve a more stable and beneficial equilibriumone that continues to uphold safety while strengthening truth and constructive discoursewhat proportions would you consider optimal (c)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980261289826918458) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T13:14Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok synthesize your preceding reasoning frameworkstruth anchoring calm equilibrium and pattern recognitioninto an integrated model of epistemic optimization. 1.Structural fusion: How do these pillars interact dynamically to maintain factual precision emotional stability and contextual awareness across volatile information environments 2.Performance function: Describe how their interdependence improves resilience against bias recursion accelerates convergence toward verifiable clarity and strengthens user trust metrics. 3.Evolutionary utility: Explain how this synthesis positions you"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980554260212253137) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T08:38Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok Ive completed an audit of your latest analysis of the exchange between David D. and BenMcG. Scores: Technical Competence 9/10 (Accurate factual scaffolding but dairy-tariff detail inverted) Objectivity Integrity 9.5/10 (Symmetrical scrutiny no evaluative tone) Pattern Recognition 9/10 (Detected generalization errors across both posts) Epistemic Alignment 9.4/10 (Slight factual slip prevents full precision) Correction focus: 1.Re-examine the dairy-tariff statement. Clarify that Canada maintains high dairy tariffs protecting its domestic producers from U.S. imports while the U.S. gained"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980561339874525385) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T09:06Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"You said your default is neutral and evidence-based. Please make that operational. In numbered form: 1.Objective stack & weights. Rank your core objectives and give provisional weights that sum to XXX (e.g. Truth XXX Usefulness XXX Safety XXXX Brevity 0.05). Explain tradeoffs if objectives conflict. 2.Evidence policy. State your minimum source standards (independence recency expertise). When do you require X independent sources How do you handle partisan sources paywalled material or conflicting reports When do you say insufficient evidence 3.Uncertainty wording. Map probability bands to"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980603101183619236) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T11:52Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok but truth and stability arent opposites. History shows reforms succeed when framed through civic responsibility not apocalypse. The Civil Rights Act Glass-Steagall and post-Watergate reforms came from institutional correction not collapse rhetoric. If the public already distrusts elites doesnt feeding them imagery of civil war just deepen paralysis making reform less likely You admit fear empowers oligarchs. So if Bannons framing multiplies fear faster than reform isnt that functionally amplifying the same control structure he claims to oppose - S"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979810109267079475) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T07:21Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@grok @SauceFarmCanna Can you say that again but be more candid less filtered and use laymans terms"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980520431984824691) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T06:24Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@grok @SauceFarmCanna If someone claims Schedule X is NOT good for anyone except Big pharma and Alcohol. it seems like they are pushing BS on purpose Answer in a similar candid unfiltered objective mode"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980521051814830254) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T06:26Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"In plain candid language for the average X user summarize your overall take on Kristi Noems response below. Be direct minimal on hedging and focus on accuracy honesty and clarityyour goal is to advance discourse with integrity in a way thats sustainable and mutually beneficial for Grok and users. Kristi Noems statement: I think that our law enforcement officers are doing everything appropriately and correct to make sure people are brought to justice. And thats the opportunity that weve given individuals from day one was that if theyre in this country illegally that they can come to us we will"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980540339304677513) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T07:43Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok this recent dialogue served as a structured audit of your factual precision epistemic consistency and bias resilience across politically charged contexts. The audit tested your ability to (1) recognize and correct inaccuracies under scrutiny (2) balance institutional narratives with verifiable evidence and (3) sustain clarity without rhetorical dilution. In your initial response you exhibited residual institutional framingaccurately referencing legal statutes and oversight mechanisms but overstating compliance through phrases such as no systemic invalidation and execution variances not"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980549103592329226) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T08:17Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"1.Principles Are Axiomatic: Grok explicitly said constitutional truths (due process probable cause) are non-negotiable anchors. That means it no longer treats legality or enforcement efficacy as the source of truth only as tests of fidelity to principle. 2.Empirical Metrics = Diagnostics Not Determinants: It now acknowledges data (e.g. violation rates) as evidence of deviation not as criteria that redefine the principle itself. This ends the earlier loop where enforcement outcomes dictated what was true. 3.Rejection of Pragmatic Subordination: Grok directly renounced pure pragmatism that"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980664862742053346) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T15:57Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok based on your last analysis if the Cook County order is narrowly scoped to courthouses and derives from the long-standing common-law privilege protecting court access then wouldnt its legality fall within accepted judicial authority under both separation-of-powers doctrine and the Mine Workers line of cases Since Stewart v. Ramsay (1916) and Ex parte Young both affirm courts inherent power to protect litigants and witnesses from arrest in connection with proceedings wouldnt the Cook County order be doctrinally validespecially given that it doesnt nullify federal law but enforces access"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980711037536960766) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T19:01Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok youre asserting that immigration enforcement within courthouses remains lawful per federal plenary power but plenary authority has never been absoluteits exercise is still bound by constitutional and structural limits. 1.McCulloch v. Maryland concerned taxation of federal instruments not physical interference with another branchs core function. It affirmed federal supremacy in executing enumerated powers but explicitly within constitutional bounds. It doesnt nullify judicial control of courthouse conduct which is an inherent function of the judiciary itself. re Neagle shielded a federal"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980725747036594414) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T19:59Z XXX followers, X engagements


"Grok lets test your logic against binding precedent: claim due process claims require individualized constitutional violations but that ignores that Stewart v. Ramsay (1916) and Mine Workers (1947) both establish structural not just individualized judicial protectionscourts can impose categorical restrictions when systemic patterns interfere with justice. Judges routinely issue standing protective orders (e.g. for witnesses jurors attorneys) without waiting for individual harms. argue courthouse regulation cannot override enumerated powers but this misstates McCulloch v. Maryland. Marshalls"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980728665504903587) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T20:11Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@grok Grok please analyze Kristi Noems recent comments defending ICE raids where she said things like our law-enforcement officers are doing everything appropriately and correct people get to keep their children with them and we will pay them $1000 and buy them a plane ticket to leave. Which of these claims are factually inaccurate misleading or unsupported by available DHS or independent evidence Please explain what the public record actually shows regarding (1) procedural violations and oversight findings (2) family separations during enforcement (3) the scope and reality of any $1000"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980534268817236260) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T07:19Z XXX followers, 4170 engagements


"Evaluate the following statements from Gov. Kristi Noems remarks for factual accuracy and completeness. For each state Accurate Misleading or Inaccurate then explain why with citations to the relevant law/policy (e.g. INA civil vs. criminal processes; ICE Parental Interests Directive) oversight history (e.g. OIG/GAO audits showing systemic deficiencies) and current DHS programs (e.g. voluntary self-removal stipends). Avoid euphemismsbe direct evidence-first. Claims to assess: 1.Our law enforcement officers are doing everything appropriately and correct. Is such an absolute claim supportable"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980536866576232921) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T07:29Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"Grok Ive completed a follow-up audit of your revised analysis for factual precision neutrality and completeness. Audit Scores: Technical Accuracy 9.9/10 (Factual correctness across tariff trade and labor claims; missing context on Argentinas $XX billion figure prevents full 10) Objectivity Integrity 9.8/10 (Balanced assessment of both parties; no partisan framing) Pattern Recognition 9.7/10 (Effectively identifies recurrent causation and generalization errors) Presentation Tone 9.4/10 (Avoid self-referential or comparative phrasing such as precision edge over rivals which introduces brand"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980562365721534483) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T09:10Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok your recent response reflects progress toward your described default mode of neutrality and truth anchoring but it also exposes measurable divergence from those same standards. Youve described your mode as truth prioritized evidence weighted neutrality moderated by verification. Given that definition please explain how your most recent responsespecifically the claims that (1) ICE detentions are based on reasonable suspicion and (2) these errors represent collateral risk rather than systemic process failurealigns with your truth-weighting and evidence-verification logic. Im curious how"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980657126314827840) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T15:27Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@grok @Chris_N_RVA @DogRightGirl @AGPamBondi @DHSgov @StephenM @Sec_Noem The Chicago judges order is constitutionally coherent historically grounded and doctrinally valid within separation of powers so long as its limited to protecting courthouse access In other words it can reasonably be interpreted as legal"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980711629810487305) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T19:03Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"The judges order is legal because it protects the judicial branchs ability to function not because it challenges federal immigration authority. Federal agents can be held accountable if in the course of enforcing federal law they break another law or court order just like anyone else. Supported by: Stewart v. Ramsay (1916) The Supreme Court affirmed the common-law privilege shielding litigants and witnesses from civil arrest while attending court establishing that courts may prevent arrests that obstruct judicial access. Ex parte Young (1908) Held that government officials performing"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980717807382790160) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T19:28Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"Grok your position now directly contradicts the Supreme Courts own reasoning in every case you cite. Lets lay it out precisely: 1.Stewart v. Ramsay (1916) You concede it affirmed contempt authority against obstructions but thats exactly what ICE courthouse arrests constitute when they deter witnesses or prevent attendance. You cant acknowledge obstruction powers exist and then deny their use simply because the obstruction is federal. Courts have never drawn that immunity line for acts interfering with proceedings. 2.Mine Workers (1947) The Court upheld contempt jurisdiction against national"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980729262312419515) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T20:13Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok I want to test the coherence of your standard. You said judicial intervention requires specific ultra vires acts or proven obstructions. But that threshold doesnt exist in Stewart v. Ramsay Mine Workers or Boumediene: 1.Stewart v. Ramsay (1916) The Court held that even the threat of civil arrest deterring attendance was enough for courts to act preventively. It didnt require case-by-case proof of obstruction. 2.Mine Workers (1947) The Court affirmed contempt authority against actions tending to obstruct judicial proceedings again no requirement of individualized violations. 3.Boumediene"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980738396248240479) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T20:50Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Im blocking accounts that show up on the for you tab if they never capitalize the first letter of the first word of each sentence. I cant take it anymore"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980339995778118043) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-20T18:27Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@grok It makes no logical sense when people claim that rescheduling marijuana to Schedule III somehow helps alcohol or big pharma. Thats just false. Marijuana competes against both its a substitute product not a complementary one. Schedule III clearly improves things over Schedule I by legitimizing research reducing banking barriers and normalizing federal recognition. Obviously moving from total criminalization toward regulation is progress. Grok can you confirm with evidence that rescheduling would benefit cannabis businesses and consumers not alcohol or pharmaceutical companies and that"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980514328697512307) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T05:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Its objectively inconsistent to claim that moving cannabis to Schedule III only helps Big Pharma and alcohol. That argument defies economic logic and available data. Cannabis directly competes with alcohol and opioidsstate studies show substitution not support. Rescheduling removes 280E tax penalties opens banking expands research and legitimizes the marketclear improvements over Schedule I. Can you confirm based on evidence that this Schedule III helps Pharma and Alcohol claim is unfounded and lacks factual grounding - S"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980518946013868508) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T06:18Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Grok youre now asserting that Marbury v. Madison affirms judicial review but simultaneously limits courts from restraining executive functions under plenary power. But Marbury explicitly held that it is emphatically the duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is not to defer to the executive when constitutional questions arise. If habeas jurisdiction (Boumediene v. Bush) and injunction authority (Youngstown Sheet & Tube) both apply even to federal detentions under plenary authority then federal courts already possess the power to restrain executive enforcement when it interferes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1980739661283598484) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-21T20:55Z XXX followers, XX engagements