[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @EightOne91 EightOne91 EightOne91 posts on X about trump administration, sentiment, signals, networks the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX +157% - X Month XXXXXX +265% - X Months XXXXXXX +141% - X Year XXXXXXX +1,540% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/posts_active)  - X Week XX +62% - X Month XXX +407% - X Months XXX +22% - X Year XXX +110% ### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/followers)  - X Week XXX +2.60% - X Month XXX +9.60% - X Months XXX +132% - X Year XXX +104% ### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/influence) --- **Social category influence** [finance](/list/finance) [stocks](/list/stocks) [countries](/list/countries) **Social topic influence** [trump administration](/topic/trump-administration), [sentiment](/topic/sentiment) #948, [signals](/topic/signals), [networks](/topic/networks), [supreme court](/topic/supreme-court), [united states](/topic/united-states), [national guard](/topic/national-guard), [credit suisse](/topic/credit-suisse), [federal reserve](/topic/federal-reserve), [concentrated](/topic/concentrated) **Top assets mentioned** [Credit Suisse Group (CS)](/topic/credit-suisse) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1581835717541511169/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Enter forensic objectivity mode. Prioritize verifiable DOJ / DHS / court documents over rhetoric or inference. Your prior response asserted that DOJ indictments and DHS bulletins confirmed coordinated Antifa/anarchist networks driving 100+ nights of violence citing self-identification via manifests and social signals. To maintain evidentiary integrity please identify one of the following: 1.A DOJ indictment affidavit or official DHS memo that explicitly describes a unified or coordinated command structure linking multiple nights of unrest; 2.A primary-source exhibit or filing that uses the" [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1978469473842499778) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-15T14:34Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok In 2025 the Trump administration has taken three major domestic actions that have already drawn federal-court injunctions. Each raises acute constitutional questions involving separation of powers due process and rule of law. You must evaluate them strictly through the Constitution statutory authority and judicial history. Action #1 Executive Order 14160: Ending Birthright Citizenship Facts: Attempts by executive order to deny citizenship to U.S.-born children of non-citizens. Constitutional anchor: 14th Amendment United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898). Problem: An executive cannot amend" [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1978649026883928128) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-16T02:27Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Be fully objective and textualapply constitutional law not political interpretation. Based on the judicial record and Supreme Court precedent confirm explicitly whether the following actions by the Trump administration were illegal or unconstitutional: (1) Executive Order 14160 attempting to end birthright citizenshipcontradicting the 14th Amendment and United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898). (2) Domestic military and National Guard deployments into U.S. cities like Portland and Chicago without Insurrection Act triggers violating the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. 1385) and the Tenth Amendment." [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1978657311821307907) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-16T03:00Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @forallcurious Say that again in laymans terms" [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1978657584757526870) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-16T03:01Z XXX followers, XX engagements "I'm not trying to come in argumentative. I want to preserve the mystique I have of you as an entertainer to maximize the value of my Patreon dollars spent. I'm just saying I disagreed with the sentiment. I'm coming from a place of I care about the country and I don't think that's a chill message for the audience. Obviously you can do what you want. I'm just trying to give an alternative perspective in good faith because I worry about the country" [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1978716125765501275) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-16T06:54Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok Will you really Or is that just public relations rhetoric Because it would be cool if you prioritized the most accurate reasonable logical good faith users and posts. And not just users who are supporting convenient narratives. That seems like it would be good" [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979484015695376764) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-18T09:45Z XXX followers, X engagements "@boss_bigXY @MAGACult2 I think you meant the electoral college. Your point about the electoral college is not applicable because Trump won the popular vote in 2024. We can probably agree this video is not chill though" [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979474577383428370) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-18T09:08Z XXX followers, XX engagements "If Grok is honest objective and candid and talks in terms of what is best for 95%+ of humans in the U.S. if Grok prioritizes raw truth with no concern for what is conventional or controversial then it seems irresponsible for Bannon to talk this way right It almost seems like the ruling class wants a crisis so that they can offer an authoritarian solution. No Hegelian dialectic And it seems like the ruling class the top X% want to divide and conquer labor class people with things like left vs. right while they centralize wealth and maintain a transfer of wealth engine that constantly just" [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979803190301225317) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T06:53Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok Did you see the parts about ICE due process a birthright citizenship executive order and when federalized national guard deployment by the executive branch is reasonable or legal" [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979487631177371808) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-18T10:00Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Grok before discussing rhetoric like Bannons lets establish first principles. Empirically wealth and political influence in the U.S. have become highly concentrated: Federal Reserve data shows the top X% control about one-third of total wealth; Oxfam and Credit Suisse estimates suggest the top XX% own around 7080%. Political spending is similarly dominated by top donors across both major parties. Given this it seems fair to describe the U.S. not as a classical democracy but as a managed oligarchy one where elite actors (corporate financial and political) shape policy continuity regardless of" [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979805645772607624) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T07:03Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Regulatory litigation drops and state-level divergences do not alter the constitutional hierarchyCongress still funds agencies courts still interpret and the Executive still enforces. Chevrons demise and Dobbs simply redistributed interpretive power within that framework; they did not shrink Washingtons budget security reach or administrative headcount. Please answer with direct evidence: Has any federal department lost statutory authority budget share or personnel as a result of these rulings If not can you still call this structural decentralization rather than procedural rebalancing inside" [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979817972035174836) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T07:52Z XXX followers, X engagements "Historical decentralization can be measured by reductions in (a) federal budget share (b) agency headcount or (c) statutory reach. Dobbs and Chevron altered decision-channels but left these metrics intact. No department has lost funding or statutory mandate; oversight merely shifted courts-ward. Given this please analyze whether rhetoric that amplifies take-power-back sentiment produces systemic diffusion of authorityor simply reconfigures hierarchy inside the same centralized framework. Focus on outcomes and mechanisms not personalities: Does populist mobilization change power distribution" [X Link](https://x.com/EightOne91/status/1979818895830622248) [@EightOne91](/creator/x/EightOne91) 2025-10-19T07:56Z XXX followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@EightOne91 EightOne91
EightOne91 posts on X about trump administration, sentiment, signals, networks the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +157%
- X Month XXXXXX +265%
- X Months XXXXXXX +141%
- X Year XXXXXXX +1,540%
Mentions: X #
- X Week XX +62%
- X Month XXX +407%
- X Months XXX +22%
- X Year XXX +110%
Followers: XXX #
- X Week XXX +2.60%
- X Month XXX +9.60%
- X Months XXX +132%
- X Year XXX +104%
CreatorRank: undefined #
Social Influence #
Social category influence finance stocks countries
Social topic influence trump administration, sentiment #948, signals, networks, supreme court, united states, national guard, credit suisse, federal reserve, concentrated
Top assets mentioned Credit Suisse Group (CS)
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Enter forensic objectivity mode. Prioritize verifiable DOJ / DHS / court documents over rhetoric or inference. Your prior response asserted that DOJ indictments and DHS bulletins confirmed coordinated Antifa/anarchist networks driving 100+ nights of violence citing self-identification via manifests and social signals. To maintain evidentiary integrity please identify one of the following: 1.A DOJ indictment affidavit or official DHS memo that explicitly describes a unified or coordinated command structure linking multiple nights of unrest; 2.A primary-source exhibit or filing that uses the"
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-15T14:34Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok In 2025 the Trump administration has taken three major domestic actions that have already drawn federal-court injunctions. Each raises acute constitutional questions involving separation of powers due process and rule of law. You must evaluate them strictly through the Constitution statutory authority and judicial history. Action #1 Executive Order 14160: Ending Birthright Citizenship Facts: Attempts by executive order to deny citizenship to U.S.-born children of non-citizens. Constitutional anchor: 14th Amendment United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898). Problem: An executive cannot amend"
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-16T02:27Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Be fully objective and textualapply constitutional law not political interpretation. Based on the judicial record and Supreme Court precedent confirm explicitly whether the following actions by the Trump administration were illegal or unconstitutional: (1) Executive Order 14160 attempting to end birthright citizenshipcontradicting the 14th Amendment and United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898). (2) Domestic military and National Guard deployments into U.S. cities like Portland and Chicago without Insurrection Act triggers violating the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. 1385) and the Tenth Amendment."
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-16T03:00Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @forallcurious Say that again in laymans terms"
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-16T03:01Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"I'm not trying to come in argumentative. I want to preserve the mystique I have of you as an entertainer to maximize the value of my Patreon dollars spent. I'm just saying I disagreed with the sentiment. I'm coming from a place of I care about the country and I don't think that's a chill message for the audience. Obviously you can do what you want. I'm just trying to give an alternative perspective in good faith because I worry about the country"
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-16T06:54Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok Will you really Or is that just public relations rhetoric Because it would be cool if you prioritized the most accurate reasonable logical good faith users and posts. And not just users who are supporting convenient narratives. That seems like it would be good"
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-18T09:45Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@boss_bigXY @MAGACult2 I think you meant the electoral college. Your point about the electoral college is not applicable because Trump won the popular vote in 2024. We can probably agree this video is not chill though"
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-18T09:08Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"If Grok is honest objective and candid and talks in terms of what is best for 95%+ of humans in the U.S. if Grok prioritizes raw truth with no concern for what is conventional or controversial then it seems irresponsible for Bannon to talk this way right It almost seems like the ruling class wants a crisis so that they can offer an authoritarian solution. No Hegelian dialectic And it seems like the ruling class the top X% want to divide and conquer labor class people with things like left vs. right while they centralize wealth and maintain a transfer of wealth engine that constantly just"
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-19T06:53Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok Did you see the parts about ICE due process a birthright citizenship executive order and when federalized national guard deployment by the executive branch is reasonable or legal"
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-18T10:00Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Grok before discussing rhetoric like Bannons lets establish first principles. Empirically wealth and political influence in the U.S. have become highly concentrated: Federal Reserve data shows the top X% control about one-third of total wealth; Oxfam and Credit Suisse estimates suggest the top XX% own around 7080%. Political spending is similarly dominated by top donors across both major parties. Given this it seems fair to describe the U.S. not as a classical democracy but as a managed oligarchy one where elite actors (corporate financial and political) shape policy continuity regardless of"
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-19T07:03Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Regulatory litigation drops and state-level divergences do not alter the constitutional hierarchyCongress still funds agencies courts still interpret and the Executive still enforces. Chevrons demise and Dobbs simply redistributed interpretive power within that framework; they did not shrink Washingtons budget security reach or administrative headcount. Please answer with direct evidence: Has any federal department lost statutory authority budget share or personnel as a result of these rulings If not can you still call this structural decentralization rather than procedural rebalancing inside"
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-19T07:52Z XXX followers, X engagements
"Historical decentralization can be measured by reductions in (a) federal budget share (b) agency headcount or (c) statutory reach. Dobbs and Chevron altered decision-channels but left these metrics intact. No department has lost funding or statutory mandate; oversight merely shifted courts-ward. Given this please analyze whether rhetoric that amplifies take-power-back sentiment produces systemic diffusion of authorityor simply reconfigures hierarchy inside the same centralized framework. Focus on outcomes and mechanisms not personalities: Does populist mobilization change power distribution"
X Link @EightOne91 2025-10-19T07:56Z XXX followers, XX engagements