[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@crypto_ceej Avatar @crypto_ceej CryptoCeej:

CryptoCeej: posts on X about holders, end the, token, builder the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total X engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: X #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: X #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: undefined #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #

Social category influence finance XXXX% currencies XXXX%

Social topic influence holders 1.21%, end the 0.61%, token 0.61%, builder 0.61%, deposit 0.61%, staking 0.61%, onchain 0.61%, betting XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @bible_xrp @youtube @flarenetworks @firelightfi @biblexrp @xrpmickle @hugophilion @virtualsio @gc9667519991057 @4ahomeloan @cryptoceej @darkhorsednme4 @zachrector7 @triggerousx @lazy0utis @deepincrypto1 @krippenreiter @layerzerolabs @axelar @yorgosv

Top Social Posts #

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"This is not a great product for the end user the XRP holder here's why. mXRP trades on DEXes but redemptions key off the issuers reference value (iNAV/NAV) minus fees not the DEX price. If you buy at a premium to iNAV youre likely to redeem less than you paidespecially after fees. Mode matters too: Instant capacity can return XRP; Standard can route you to USD after a queue. Bottom line: mXRP is a cash-settled collateral-backed securitytreat the DEX price the reference value the mode and the fees as four separate risk knobs"
X Link @crypto_ceej 2025-10-09T02:21Z 5343 followers, XXX engagements

"The Axelar team can be and is awesome. That has nothing to do with how Midas operates. In the end the CEL token was deemed a security and Celsius was operating without the proper licenses. Which ultimately ended up hurting the end users. So yes whatever Axelar's role in this can be a "real builder". That's not what's in question here. That doesn't make mXRP great for the end-user ( XRP holders)"
X Link @crypto_ceej 2025-10-09T16:02Z 5343 followers, XXX engagements

"Firelights design is categorically different. No manager can move funds button. You opt into a programmatic strategy at deposit; parameters and exits are enforced by code. The team cant repurpose funds or chase yield elsewhere"
X Link @crypto_ceej 2025-10-10T17:56Z 5342 followers, XXX engagements

"stXRP keeps control in your wallet. mXRP asks you to hand it over. With stXRP (non-custodial) Control: You keep control through your wallet; exits are governed by code not a desk. Predictability: Returns track staking economics; fewer black-box surprises. Stress behavior: If markets panic you can still unstake or swap (subject to liquidity/unbonding) and no human can gate you. With mXRP (custodial/managed) Trust transfer: You transfer control to a structure + manager; you rely on their processes and solvency. Path dependency: In turbulence the issuer may gate redemptions or apply NAV"
X Link @crypto_ceej 2025-09-23T18:08Z 5342 followers, 7187 engagements

"Discretionary management hedge fund risk. With vault products the operator can actively trade/lend/hedgesometimes on-chain and off-chain. Youre betting on their decisions their risk controls and their solvency"
X Link @crypto_ceej 2025-10-10T17:53Z 5342 followers, XXX engagements

"Licensing & oversight matter. If a manager isnt authorized/supervised like a traditional asset manager youre taking TradFi-style risk without TradFi protections (gate risk NAV haircuts redemption delays legal uncertainty)"
X Link @crypto_ceej 2025-10-10T17:55Z 5342 followers, XXX engagements

"What this means for holders. Vaults (mXRP/Doppler-type): counterparty + strategy + redemption risk. Firelight: smart-contract risk + market risk of the chosen strategy but not discretionary reallocation risk"
X Link @crypto_ceej 2025-10-10T17:58Z 5342 followers, XXX engagements