[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  $360kwh Social media discussions focus on the cost of production for $360kwh. Recent posts suggest potential progress towards profitability. ### About $360kwh Analysis of social media engagement and discussion around the topic $360kwh. ### Engagements: XX [#](/topic/$360kwh/interactions) ---  [Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$360kwh/time-series/interactions.tsv) **Current Value**: XX **Daily Average**: XX **1-Year High**: XXX on 2025-07-24 **1-Year Low**: X on 2025-05-26 | Social Network | X | | -------------- | - | | Engagements | XX | ### Mentions: X [#](/topic/$360kwh/posts_active) ---  [Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$360kwh/time-series/posts_active.tsv) **Current Value**: X **Daily Average**: X **1-Year High**: X on 2025-05-25 **1-Year Low**: X on 2025-05-25 | Social Network | X | | -------------- | - | | Mentions | X | ### Creators: X [#](/topic/$360kwh/contributors_active) ---  [Creators 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$360kwh/time-series/contributors_active.tsv) X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $360kwh in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours **Daily Average**: X **1-Year High**: X on 2025-05-25 **1-Year Low**: X on 2025-05-25 **Top topics mentioned** In the posts about $360kwh in the last XX hours [$230kwh](/topic/$230kwh), [$1000kwh](/topic/$1000kwh), [greg](/topic/greg) ### Top Social Posts [#](/topic/$360kwh/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours *Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.* "I'm not sure all grasp the slide. Look at the sub+title: XX% Cost out as of Q1 XX% Cost out at "volume" ++++ If we assume launch COGS was $1000/KWh the. Q1 was still $360/KWh COGS. But if we are now "at volume" (like I propose) then we are down to $230/KWh COGS. ++++ Thus my theory that very early in Q2 "CM+ with the 45X credit" was achieved and now X months later we are near achieving "CM+ without the 45X credit" and may have already done so" [@FreemyerGreg](/creator/x/FreemyerGreg) on [X](/post/tweet/1948417451319795774) 2025-07-24 16:18:14 UTC 1033 followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Social media discussions focus on the cost of production for $360kwh. Recent posts suggest potential progress towards profitability.
Analysis of social media engagement and discussion around the topic $360kwh.
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: XX
Daily Average: XX
1-Year High: XXX on 2025-07-24
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-26
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Engagements | XX |
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-05-25
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-25
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Mentions | X |
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $360kwh in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-05-25
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-25
Top topics mentioned In the posts about $360kwh in the last XX hours
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"I'm not sure all grasp the slide. Look at the sub+title: XX% Cost out as of Q1 XX% Cost out at "volume" ++++ If we assume launch COGS was $1000/KWh the. Q1 was still $360/KWh COGS. But if we are now "at volume" (like I propose) then we are down to $230/KWh COGS. ++++ Thus my theory that very early in Q2 "CM+ with the 45X credit" was achieved and now X months later we are near achieving "CM+ without the 45X credit" and may have already done so"
@FreemyerGreg on X 2025-07-24 16:18:14 UTC 1033 followers, XXX engagements
/topic/$360kwh