[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![$230kwh Graphic](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/t:$230kwh.png) $230kwh

Social media buzz around $230kwh is focused on the potential for EOSE to be a winner. Discussions center on the cost of COGS and its impact on the company's performance.

### About $230kwh
Discussion and analysis of the social media activity surrounding the topic of $230kwh, likely related to a financial or technological subject.  

### Engagements: XX [#](/topic/$230kwh/interactions)
---
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/t:$230kwh/c:line/m:interactions.svg)  
[Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$230kwh/time-series/interactions.tsv)  
**Current Value**: XX  
**Daily Average**: XXX  
**1-Year High**: XXX on 2025-07-24  
**1-Year Low**: X on 2025-07-27  

| Social Network | X  |
| -------------- | -  |
| Engagements    | XX |
  

  
  
### Mentions: X [#](/topic/$230kwh/posts_active)
---
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/t:$230kwh/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)  
[Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$230kwh/time-series/posts_active.tsv)  
**Current Value**: X  
**Daily Average**: X  
**1-Year High**: X on 2025-07-24  
**1-Year Low**: X on 2025-07-27  

| Social Network | X |
| -------------- | - |
| Mentions       | X |
  

  
  
### Creators: X [#](/topic/$230kwh/contributors_active)
---
![Creators Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/t:$230kwh/c:line/m:contributors_active.svg)  
[Creators 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$230kwh/time-series/contributors_active.tsv)  
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $230kwh in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
**Daily Average**: X  
**1-Year High**: X on 2025-07-24  
**1-Year Low**: X on 2025-07-24  

The most influential creators that mention $230kwh in the last XX hours

| Creator                                        | Rank | Followers | Posts | Engagements |
| -------                                        | ---- | --------- | ----- | ----------- |
| [@FreemyerGreg](/creator/twitter/FreemyerGreg) | X    | XXXXX     | X     | XXX         |

[View More](/list/creators/$230kwh/100)

**Top assets mentioned**
In the posts about $230kwh in the last XX hours

[Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE)](/topic/$eose)

**Top topics mentioned**
In the posts about $230kwh in the last XX hours

[greg](/topic/greg), [$360kwh](/topic/$360kwh), [$1000kwh](/topic/$1000kwh), [$eose](/topic/$eose), [stocks energy](/topic/stocks-energy)

### Top Social Posts [#](/topic/$230kwh/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

*Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.*

"Also note that slide isn't talking about marginal COGS. It is talking about all in COGS If $eose is down to $230/KWh COGS without the 45X credit we have ourselves a huge winner. Hopefully that isn't news to anyone"  
[@FreemyerGreg](/creator/x/FreemyerGreg) on [X](/post/tweet/1948418903798874258) 2025-07-24 16:24:01 UTC 1034 followers, XXX engagements


"I'm not sure all grasp the slide. Look at the sub+title: XX% Cost out as of Q1 XX% Cost out at "volume" ++++ If we assume launch COGS was $1000/KWh the. Q1 was still $360/KWh COGS. But if we are now "at volume" (like I propose) then we are down to $230/KWh COGS. ++++ Thus my theory that very early in Q2 "CM+ with the 45X credit" was achieved and now X months later we are near achieving "CM+ without the 45X credit" and may have already done so"  
[@FreemyerGreg](/creator/x/FreemyerGreg) on [X](/post/tweet/1948417451319795774) 2025-07-24 16:18:14 UTC 1033 followers, XXX engagements