[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] [$100kday](/topic/$100kday) ### Top Social Posts *Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.* "We're XX days away from Black Friday Scaled a brand to $800k/day last BF happy to share what actually worked Drop every single question you have about scaling an Ecom brand to $100k/day during BFCM Creative strategy fulfillment customer service CRO. I'll answer it all" [X Link](https://x.com/_shauneng/status/1979665088429818161) [@_shauneng](/creator/x/_shauneng) 2025-10-18T21:45Z 20.4K followers, 22.4K engagements "$100M in sales doesnt mean $100k/day in spend. A lot of brands that do $100M dont spend $36M+ per year. I would assume a $100M brand is doing $25M to $30M spend. It also sounded like something you did awhile ago. I cant remember whether the resolution had a time bound to it but I do think it USED to be more possible to scale like that with fewer ads. Less possible now" [X Link](https://x.com/johnjhcoyle/status/1979624346839904701) [@johnjhcoyle](/creator/x/johnjhcoyle) 2025-10-18T19:03Z 7639 followers, XX engagements "Sure but lets play it out (and this is important) You say well heres Tesla they have no ads. And Jordan says ok I concede lets adjust the resolution to specify $100K/day spent on Meta. And then its your turn again. So where you and I agree is that because he cannot prove the resolution true its up to you to prove it false. And you may invalidate it in ways that force him to clarify what he actually means. And in that somewhere is the root of the disagreement because eventually youll find a spot where you provide invalidating evidence that he doesnt think invalidates and this is what you guys" [X Link](https://x.com/Iandickson22/status/1979355435376460109) [@Iandickson22](/creator/x/Iandickson22) 2025-10-18T01:14Z XX followers, XX engagements "It's possible to scale to profitably scale to X figures per day with just X ad. I've scaled to $60k with just X winner. Haven't seen anyone CONSISTENTLY scale to $100k/day without a lot of ads. All it takes is one example to disprove the resolution. Which Charlie failed to show" [X Link](https://x.com/d_grimripper/status/1979280994017436039) [@d_grimripper](/creator/x/d_grimripper) 2025-10-17T20:18Z XXX followers, 5034 engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"We're XX days away from Black Friday Scaled a brand to $800k/day last BF happy to share what actually worked Drop every single question you have about scaling an Ecom brand to $100k/day during BFCM Creative strategy fulfillment customer service CRO. I'll answer it all"
X Link @_shauneng 2025-10-18T21:45Z 20.4K followers, 22.4K engagements
"$100M in sales doesnt mean $100k/day in spend. A lot of brands that do $100M dont spend $36M+ per year. I would assume a $100M brand is doing $25M to $30M spend. It also sounded like something you did awhile ago. I cant remember whether the resolution had a time bound to it but I do think it USED to be more possible to scale like that with fewer ads. Less possible now"
X Link @johnjhcoyle 2025-10-18T19:03Z 7639 followers, XX engagements
"Sure but lets play it out (and this is important) You say well heres Tesla they have no ads. And Jordan says ok I concede lets adjust the resolution to specify $100K/day spent on Meta. And then its your turn again. So where you and I agree is that because he cannot prove the resolution true its up to you to prove it false. And you may invalidate it in ways that force him to clarify what he actually means. And in that somewhere is the root of the disagreement because eventually youll find a spot where you provide invalidating evidence that he doesnt think invalidates and this is what you guys"
X Link @Iandickson22 2025-10-18T01:14Z XX followers, XX engagements
"It's possible to scale to profitably scale to X figures per day with just X ad. I've scaled to $60k with just X winner. Haven't seen anyone CONSISTENTLY scale to $100k/day without a lot of ads. All it takes is one example to disprove the resolution. Which Charlie failed to show"
X Link @d_grimripper 2025-10-17T20:18Z XXX followers, 5034 engagements
/topic/$100kday/posts