[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @Iandickson22 Ian Dickson Ian Dickson posts on X about jordan, meta, tesla, ads the most. They currently have XX followers and X posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1812302954197852160/interactions)  - X Months XX -XX% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1812302954197852160/posts_active)  ### Followers: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1812302954197852160/followers)  - X Months XX +300% ### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::1812302954197852160/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1812302954197852160/influence) --- **Social category influence** [countries](/list/countries) [technology brands](/list/technology-brands) [automotive brands](/list/automotive-brands) [stocks](/list/stocks) **Social topic influence** [jordan](/topic/jordan), [meta](/topic/meta), [tesla](/topic/tesla), [ads](/topic/ads), [$100kday](/topic/$100kday), [$10m](/topic/$10m), [$100m](/topic/$100m), [10m](/topic/10m), [100m](/topic/100m), [the only](/topic/the-only) **Top assets mentioned** [Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)](/topic/tesla) [Hundred Million (100M)](/topic/$100m) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1812302954197852160/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Sure but lets play it out (and this is important) You say well heres Tesla they have no ads. And Jordan says ok I concede lets adjust the resolution to specify $100K/day spent on Meta. And then its your turn again. So where you and I agree is that because he cannot prove the resolution true its up to you to prove it false. And you may invalidate it in ways that force him to clarify what he actually means. And in that somewhere is the root of the disagreement because eventually youll find a spot where you provide invalidating evidence that he doesnt think invalidates and this is what you guys" [X Link](https://x.com/Iandickson22/status/1979355435376460109) [@Iandickson22](/creator/x/Iandickson22) 2025-10-18T01:14Z XX followers, XX engagements "Forgive me for being so literal but I cant help point out again that the resolution is not about going from $10M to $100M. Your repeated pointing to best and $10M to $100M are why Jordan called your evidence irrelevant on the debate. He was arguing for the resolution of: Resolved: The only way to scale to six figures per day in ad spend on Meta profitably is with high volume of diverse creative. And details are here: I simply think you didnt argue against this specific resolution and details and because he did (and it was explicitly agreed to and documented) he can just say your points are" [X Link](https://x.com/Iandickson22/status/1979366500642214104) [@Iandickson22](/creator/x/Iandickson22) 2025-10-18T01:58Z XX followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@Iandickson22 Ian Dickson
Ian Dickson posts on X about jordan, meta, tesla, ads the most. They currently have XX followers and X posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XX #
- X Months XX -XX%
Mentions: X #
Followers: XX #
- X Months XX +300%
CreatorRank: undefined #
Social Influence #
Social category influence countries technology brands automotive brands stocks
Social topic influence jordan, meta, tesla, ads, $100kday, $10m, $100m, 10m, 100m, the only
Top assets mentioned Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) Hundred Million (100M)
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Sure but lets play it out (and this is important) You say well heres Tesla they have no ads. And Jordan says ok I concede lets adjust the resolution to specify $100K/day spent on Meta. And then its your turn again. So where you and I agree is that because he cannot prove the resolution true its up to you to prove it false. And you may invalidate it in ways that force him to clarify what he actually means. And in that somewhere is the root of the disagreement because eventually youll find a spot where you provide invalidating evidence that he doesnt think invalidates and this is what you guys"
X Link @Iandickson22 2025-10-18T01:14Z XX followers, XX engagements
"Forgive me for being so literal but I cant help point out again that the resolution is not about going from $10M to $100M. Your repeated pointing to best and $10M to $100M are why Jordan called your evidence irrelevant on the debate. He was arguing for the resolution of: Resolved: The only way to scale to six figures per day in ad spend on Meta profitably is with high volume of diverse creative. And details are here: I simply think you didnt argue against this specific resolution and details and because he did (and it was explicitly agreed to and documented) he can just say your points are"
X Link @Iandickson22 2025-10-18T01:58Z XX followers, XX engagements