[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Ark Protocol ⚛️ [@arkprotocol](/creator/twitter/arkprotocol) on x 4626 followers Created: 2025-07-26 01:08:57 UTC 🗳 Prop #1006 is LIVE on the Cosmos Hub! Let’s build a Cosmos where businesses thrive, data moves freely, and $ATOM wins. Vote YES on Prop #1006 💥 Vote: Forum: A reworked proposal shaped by feedback on Prop #1005. Here's what's inside 🧵 1️⃣ Why Prop #1005 failed It lacked clarity, ATOM-alignment, and cost efficiency. This version addresses all three - aligning with ICL’s vision for a sovereign, interoperable Cosmos for enterprise adoption and ATOM value accrual. 2️⃣ Vision Alignment ICL proposes Cosmos should empower businesses by: a) sovereignity: letting them run their own, custom chains b) interoperability: enabling cross-chain data exchange via IBC Eureka routed through the Hub That’s exactly what this proposal does. 📽 Watch Cryptocito’s interview with Mag for full context: 3️⃣ Web3 analogy: Think of IBC Eureka as TCP and our NFT Bridge as HTTP. IBC connects blockchains like TCP connects servers. Our bridge is the business data layer - enabling contracts to exchange ownership/data via NFTs across chains. 4️⃣ Example A supply chain contract on Chain A sends an NFT with shipment metadata to Chain B - securely transferring verifiable ownership between contracts. All routed via the Hub using IBC and CosmosEVM. 5️⃣ Technical Scope - Solidity ICS-721 bridge contract - Front-end for transfers So far we've deployed on Cosmos Hub, Injective, Juno, Neutron, Osmosis, Stargaze, and Terra. We are also the main contributors of cw-ics721 and cw-nfts. 6️⃣ Budget: $XXXXXX USDC (and not $ATOM) Dev only (no audit or ops costs - cut to reduce scope) X milestones: dev start, testnet, mainnet Funds held by Ark Oversight DAO (3-of-6 multisig) DAO: 7️⃣ Voting options ✅ YES: You support enterprise-grade bridges that enhance $ATOM value and Cosmos adoption ❌ NO: You believe business NFT bridges are unnecessary ➖ Abstain: Counted toward quorum ⛔ No with Veto: Treat this proposal as spam Let’s build a Cosmos where businesses thrive, data moves freely, and $ATOM wins. Vote YES on Prop #1006 💥 XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [atom](/topic/atom) [clarity](/topic/clarity) [thrive](/topic/thrive) [hub](/topic/hub) [cosmos](/topic/cosmos) [protocol](/topic/protocol) [ark](/topic/ark) [$atom](/topic/$atom) [Post Link](https://x.com/arkprotocol/status/1948913396549665235)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Ark Protocol ⚛️ @arkprotocol on x 4626 followers
Created: 2025-07-26 01:08:57 UTC
🗳 Prop #1006 is LIVE on the Cosmos Hub!
Let’s build a Cosmos where businesses thrive, data moves freely, and $ATOM wins. Vote YES on Prop #1006 💥
Vote:
Forum:
A reworked proposal shaped by feedback on Prop #1005. Here's what's inside 🧵
1️⃣ Why Prop #1005 failed
It lacked clarity, ATOM-alignment, and cost efficiency. This version addresses all three - aligning with ICL’s vision for a sovereign, interoperable Cosmos for enterprise adoption and ATOM value accrual.
2️⃣ Vision Alignment
ICL proposes Cosmos should empower businesses by:
a) sovereignity: letting them run their own, custom chains b) interoperability: enabling cross-chain data exchange via IBC Eureka routed through the Hub
That’s exactly what this proposal does.
📽 Watch Cryptocito’s interview with Mag for full context:
3️⃣ Web3 analogy:
Think of IBC Eureka as TCP and our NFT Bridge as HTTP.
IBC connects blockchains like TCP connects servers. Our bridge is the business data layer - enabling contracts to exchange ownership/data via NFTs across chains.
4️⃣ Example
A supply chain contract on Chain A sends an NFT with shipment metadata to Chain B - securely transferring verifiable ownership between contracts.
All routed via the Hub using IBC and CosmosEVM.
5️⃣ Technical Scope
- Solidity ICS-721 bridge contract
- Front-end for transfers
So far we've deployed on Cosmos Hub, Injective, Juno, Neutron, Osmosis, Stargaze, and Terra.
We are also the main contributors of cw-ics721 and cw-nfts.
6️⃣ Budget: $XXXXXX USDC (and not $ATOM)
Dev only (no audit or ops costs - cut to reduce scope) X milestones: dev start, testnet, mainnet
Funds held by Ark Oversight DAO (3-of-6 multisig) DAO:
7️⃣ Voting options
✅ YES: You support enterprise-grade bridges that enhance $ATOM value and Cosmos adoption ❌ NO: You believe business NFT bridges are unnecessary ➖ Abstain: Counted toward quorum ⛔ No with Veto: Treat this proposal as spam
Let’s build a Cosmos where businesses thrive, data moves freely, and $ATOM wins. Vote YES on Prop #1006 💥
XXXXX engagements
Related Topics atom clarity thrive hub cosmos protocol ark $atom