[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Tom McClellan [@McClellanOsc](/creator/twitter/McClellanOsc) on x 115.7K followers Created: 2025-07-23 21:03:33 UTC Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act clearly makes this expression of preference illegal. Given that an Uber driver is an independent contractor, and thus the rider is the de facto "employer", this would have to lead to prosecution of riders for expressing this preference, and to Uber as an accessory for facilitating it (unless we all just ignore the law).  XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [drivers](/topic/drivers) [women](/topic/women) [united states](/topic/united-states) [$uber](/topic/$uber) [stocks technology](/topic/stocks-technology) [Post Link](https://x.com/McClellanOsc/status/1948126862418575718)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Tom McClellan @McClellanOsc on x 115.7K followers
Created: 2025-07-23 21:03:33 UTC
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act clearly makes this expression of preference illegal. Given that an Uber driver is an independent contractor, and thus the rider is the de facto "employer", this would have to lead to prosecution of riders for expressing this preference, and to Uber as an accessory for facilitating it (unless we all just ignore the law).
XXXXXX engagements
Related Topics drivers women united states $uber stocks technology
/post/tweet::1948126862418575718