[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  EndGame Macro [@onechancefreedm](/creator/twitter/onechancefreedm) on x 39.8K followers Created: 2025-07-21 18:35:48 UTC What you’re referring to is a well-documented and ultimately inconsequential quirk from the XRP Ledger’s earliest days, when the first XXXXXX ledgers, roughly the first week of network activity weren’t permanently archived due to early infrastructure limitations. This wasn’t a consensus failure, and no transactions were reversed or lost from a functional standpoint. XRP Ledger’s architecture ensures that every single ledger contains a full snapshot of the current system state. So even without those initial records, the network remains mathematically and cryptographically intact. Ledger #32,570 became the de facto genesis only because resetting the ledger index would have caused unnecessary disruption, not because the chain lacked integrity. Bitcoin had its own share of issues in the beginning too. Early bugs, partial block validation inconsistencies, and even Satoshi’s own edits to the codebase were needed to keep the system running. If we judged Bitcoin purely by its earliest glitches, it would never have become what it is. The reality is that all decentralized systems evolve from imperfect foundations. The XRP Ledger has not experienced a chain reorg or consensus failure in over a decade, something that even Bitcoin and Ethereum can’t claim. So the idea that this ledger gap somehow undermines XRP’s legitimacy is either a misunderstanding or willful misrepresentation. Especially when the XRP Ledger is one of the most resilient, efficient, and enterprise ready chains in existence, processing transactions in seconds at negligible cost, with no need for mining or massive energy consumption. The cult narrative is lazy and people support XRP because it works, not because they’re stupid. XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [endgame](/topic/endgame) [Post Link](https://x.com/onechancefreedm/status/1947364907802104223)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
EndGame Macro @onechancefreedm on x 39.8K followers
Created: 2025-07-21 18:35:48 UTC
What you’re referring to is a well-documented and ultimately inconsequential quirk from the XRP Ledger’s earliest days, when the first XXXXXX ledgers, roughly the first week of network activity weren’t permanently archived due to early infrastructure limitations. This wasn’t a consensus failure, and no transactions were reversed or lost from a functional standpoint. XRP Ledger’s architecture ensures that every single ledger contains a full snapshot of the current system state. So even without those initial records, the network remains mathematically and cryptographically intact. Ledger #32,570 became the de facto genesis only because resetting the ledger index would have caused unnecessary disruption, not because the chain lacked integrity.
Bitcoin had its own share of issues in the beginning too. Early bugs, partial block validation inconsistencies, and even Satoshi’s own edits to the codebase were needed to keep the system running. If we judged Bitcoin purely by its earliest glitches, it would never have become what it is. The reality is that all decentralized systems evolve from imperfect foundations. The XRP Ledger has not experienced a chain reorg or consensus failure in over a decade, something that even Bitcoin and Ethereum can’t claim.
So the idea that this ledger gap somehow undermines XRP’s legitimacy is either a misunderstanding or willful misrepresentation. Especially when the XRP Ledger is one of the most resilient, efficient, and enterprise ready chains in existence, processing transactions in seconds at negligible cost, with no need for mining or massive energy consumption. The cult narrative is lazy and people support XRP because it works, not because they’re stupid.
XXXXX engagements
Related Topics endgame