[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Eldar [@eldarcap](/creator/twitter/eldarcap) on x 1363 followers Created: 2025-07-15 13:29:36 UTC This is an extremely important proposal and I am glad there is finally something up along those lines. I have been proposing the DAO raise capital against OTC $INV deals to repay the bad debt for quite some time now and I am happy to see that it is finally coming to fruition. The repayment of the remaining bad debt via a protocol loans against the $AERO and $VELO vetoken via @40acres_Finance is also brilliant. We can leverage to benefit @InverseFinance and $DOLA growth without selling those precious productive assets. That being said, there are two main points that I would like X main point that I would like @NourHaridy and the Inverse team to consider. 1). Given the OTC deal price is XX $DOLA per $INV, which is below the market price before announcement of around $XX (now $37), I don't see a real reason to only allow this deal to privileged actors. That is unless they can concretely prove they can bring extra value apart from pure capital. It would be easy to repurpose the bond system to allow long-term retail supporters of the protocol to benefit from the same deal, pricing and locking duration. It goes a bit against the crypto Ethos of egalitarian chances and access to opportunity. 2). I feel the 6-month lock-up period is too short given the OTC deal price. The price discount is quite large at $25, especially given that nobody could get the fixed market price when aping with $2.6M into $INV onchain/offchain liquidity. + the announcement effect and the bull market starting $XX price tag is a hell of a discount. I think a lock-up period of X years would be more fair and would signal a stronger commitment to the @InverseFinance and $DOLA ecosystem. While I agree with most of the proposal and I am thrilled to see it happen, I think a few adjustments would make it more fair to the current and long-term $INV holders. $DOLA is on its way to become a major yield-bearing stablecoin. XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [$26m](/topic/$26m) [protocol](/topic/protocol) [debt](/topic/debt) [default risk](/topic/default-risk) [otc](/topic/otc) [coins dao](/topic/coins-dao) [$inv](/topic/$inv) [coins defi](/topic/coins-defi) [Post Link](https://x.com/eldarcap/status/1945113521320022039)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Eldar @eldarcap on x 1363 followers
Created: 2025-07-15 13:29:36 UTC
This is an extremely important proposal and I am glad there is finally something up along those lines.
I have been proposing the DAO raise capital against OTC $INV deals to repay the bad debt for quite some time now and I am happy to see that it is finally coming to fruition.
The repayment of the remaining bad debt via a protocol loans against the $AERO and $VELO vetoken via @40acres_Finance is also brilliant. We can leverage to benefit @InverseFinance and $DOLA growth without selling those precious productive assets.
That being said, there are two main points that I would like X main point that I would like @NourHaridy and the Inverse team to consider.
1). Given the OTC deal price is XX $DOLA per $INV, which is below the market price before announcement of around $XX (now $37), I don't see a real reason to only allow this deal to privileged actors. That is unless they can concretely prove they can bring extra value apart from pure capital.
It would be easy to repurpose the bond system to allow long-term retail supporters of the protocol to benefit from the same deal, pricing and locking duration. It goes a bit against the crypto Ethos of egalitarian chances and access to opportunity.
2). I feel the 6-month lock-up period is too short given the OTC deal price. The price discount is quite large at $25, especially given that nobody could get the fixed market price when aping with $2.6M into $INV onchain/offchain liquidity.
- the announcement effect and the bull market starting $XX price tag is a hell of a discount. I think a lock-up period of X years would be more fair and would signal a stronger commitment to the @InverseFinance and $DOLA ecosystem.
While I agree with most of the proposal and I am thrilled to see it happen, I think a few adjustments would make it more fair to the current and long-term $INV holders.
$DOLA is on its way to become a major yield-bearing stablecoin.
XXXXX engagements
Related Topics $26m protocol debt default risk otc coins dao $inv coins defi