[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![freedombill3 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::52024164.png) Freedom Bill 💸🏖️🏝️ [@freedombill3](/creator/twitter/freedombill3) on x 1541 followers
Created: 2025-07-14 09:54:24 UTC

I ran a real test.

Asked both Grok X and ChatGPT 4o to analyse my £324k portfolio (87% in $QQQ, Nasdaq XXX exposure).

Here's what happened.

Grok 3's analysis:
• Flagged tech concentration risk.
• Suggested diversifying + boosting yield.
• But misread portfolio as £2.1M !!, £17k dividends.
• Mistook ETF heavy exposure as direct stock picks.

ChatGPT 4o's analysis:
• Spotted $QQQ overexposure.
• Suggested gradual diversification into S&P500 and global ETF's.
• Accurate value + dividend tracking.
• Focused on long term growth, not just short term numbers.

Both saw the strategy risk.
Only one got the data right.

AI can advise, but I still need to lead.

Can we trust AI yet?


XXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1944696976487940263/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[qqq](/topic/qqq)
[fund manager](/topic/fund-manager)
[happened](/topic/happened)
[nasdaq](/topic/nasdaq)
[$qqq](/topic/$qqq)
[open ai](/topic/open-ai)

[Post Link](https://x.com/freedombill3/status/1944696976487940263)