[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @uscs74 Washington Senators Washington Senators posts on X about $schd, $schg the most. They currently have XX followers and X posts still getting attention that total X engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: X [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/interactions)  - X Week XXX +423% - X Months XXX -XX% - X Year XXX -XX% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/posts_active)  ### Followers: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/followers)  - X Week XX -XXXX% - X Months XX +72% - X Year XX -XX% ### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/influence) --- **Social topic influence** [$schd](/topic/$schd) 50%, [$schg](/topic/$schg) XX% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@schd](/creator/undefined) [@schg](/creator/undefined) [@cgdv](/creator/undefined) [@wtv](/creator/undefined) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Stan: Like I've said I appreciate your opinion; I read them. It seems to me $SCHG is as good or better "FIT" with $SCHD. The X year record of @CGDV is outstanding but the long term record of @SCHD & @SCHG I realize @CGDV & @SCHG are different approaches however @SCHG "IMO" appears to be a better "FIT" for @SCHD"  [@uscs74](/creator/x/uscs74) on [X](/post/tweet/1946561468486365295) 2025-07-19 13:23:14 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Washington Senators posts on X about $schd, $schg the most. They currently have XX followers and X posts still getting attention that total X engagements in the last XX hours.
Social topic influence $schd 50%, $schg XX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @schd @schg @cgdv @wtv
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Stan: Like I've said I appreciate your opinion; I read them. It seems to me $SCHG is as good or better "FIT" with $SCHD. The X year record of @CGDV is outstanding but the long term record of @SCHD & @SCHG I realize @CGDV & @SCHG are different approaches however @SCHG "IMO" appears to be a better "FIT" for @SCHD" @uscs74 on X 2025-07-19 13:23:14 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements
/creator/x::uscs74