Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@uscs74 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1648462877487947776.png) @uscs74 Washington Senators

Washington Senators posts on X about $schd, $schg the most. They currently have XX followers and X posts still getting attention that total X engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: X [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1648462877487947776/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXX +423%
- X Months XXX -XX%
- X Year XXX -XX%

### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1648462877487947776/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)


### Followers: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1648462877487947776/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XX -XXXX%
- X Months XX +72%
- X Year XX -XX%

### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1648462877487947776/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/influence)
---

**Social topic influence**
[$schd](/topic/$schd) 50%, [$schg](/topic/$schg) XX%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@schd](/creator/undefined) [@schg](/creator/undefined) [@cgdv](/creator/undefined) [@wtv](/creator/undefined)
### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1648462877487947776/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Stan: Like I've said I appreciate your opinion; I read them. It seems to me $SCHG is as good or better "FIT" with $SCHD. The X year record of @CGDV is outstanding but the long term record of @SCHD & @SCHG I realize @CGDV & @SCHG are different approaches however @SCHG "IMO" appears to be a better "FIT" for @SCHD"  
![@uscs74 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:16/cr:twitter::1648462877487947776.png) [@uscs74](/creator/x/uscs74) on [X](/post/tweet/1946561468486365295) 2025-07-19 13:23:14 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@uscs74 Avatar @uscs74 Washington Senators

Washington Senators posts on X about $schd, $schg the most. They currently have XX followers and X posts still getting attention that total X engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: X #

Engagements Line Chart

  • X Week XXX +423%
  • X Months XXX -XX%
  • X Year XXX -XX%

Mentions: X #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XX #

Followers Line Chart

  • X Week XX -XXXX%
  • X Months XX +72%
  • X Year XX -XX%

CreatorRank: undefined #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #

Social topic influence $schd 50%, $schg XX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @schd @schg @cgdv @wtv

Top Social Posts #

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Stan: Like I've said I appreciate your opinion; I read them. It seems to me $SCHG is as good or better "FIT" with $SCHD. The X year record of @CGDV is outstanding but the long term record of @SCHD & @SCHG I realize @CGDV & @SCHG are different approaches however @SCHG "IMO" appears to be a better "FIT" for @SCHD"
@uscs74 Avatar @uscs74 on X 2025-07-19 13:23:14 UTC XX followers, XXX engagements

creator/x::uscs74
/creator/x::uscs74