[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@oomahq Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1861017169158410240.png) @oomahq Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻

Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻 posts on X about bitcoin, mining, the only, protocol the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1861017169158410240/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1861017169158410240/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXXX +206%
- X Months XXXXXXX +859%

### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1861017169158410240/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1861017169158410240/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Month XXX +33%
- X Months XXX +397%

### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1861017169158410240/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1861017169158410240/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXXXX +2.20%
- X Month XXXXX +19%
- X Months XXXXX +326%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1861017169158410240/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1861017169158410240/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1861017169158410240/influence)
---

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  [finance](/list/finance) 

**Social topic influence**
[bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) #4441, [mining](/topic/mining) #399, [the only](/topic/the-only), [protocol](/topic/protocol), [pools](/topic/pools), [money](/topic/money), [scaling](/topic/scaling), [influencer](/topic/influencer), [hosts](/topic/hosts), [bitcoin mining](/topic/bitcoin-mining)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [ORDI (ORDI)](/topic/$ordi)
### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1861017169158410240/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"If you only learn one thing about the OP_RETURN drama make it this: The biggest threat to Bitcoin's censorship resistance is that the biggest pools stop mining on top of blocks found by anyone and start mining only on top of blocks found by a small cartel of pools. Another name for this scenario is XX% attack. Independent solo mining would not be possible anymore and you'd need to join the cartel and pass KYC to mine. If that happens your txs will only get mined if they enter Foundry's or AntPool's mempool. States will lean on this chokepoint to apply blacklists first on their mempools then"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1976029477164511656) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-08T20:58Z 1776 followers, 26.7K engagements


"@bergealex4 Since Bitcoin became a cheap file server I can transact at sub X s/vB whenever I want. No one who still uses bitcoin as money needs any scaling solution but go ahead waste your time"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979867816695365916) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T11:10Z 1776 followers, 2905 engagements


"@LukeDashjr @Rombbb_Gaming Why nested segwit after all these years"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1976053117151035571) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-08T22:32Z 1768 followers, XXX engagements


"@jabravo Yes. But it's constructed from mined blocks it bears no relation to mempool policies/filters"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979174219666587665) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-17T13:14Z 1768 followers, XX engagements


"@giacomozucco @_DavidSFreeman @coinjoined @start9labs @adam3us @_MattHill_ Next influencer who hosts any of them on their podcast should ask them about their take on the security budget and their perspective on post-subsidy Bitcoin mining. e-z"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979254988451844176) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-17T18:35Z 1768 followers, XX engagements


"@Horizon_btc"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979518886404919335) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-18T12:04Z 1765 followers, XX engagements


"@ndgo1370 Many people don't seem to understand (or pretend to not understand) that of all the infinite ways to embed data onchain OP_RETURN is the only one that is unambiguous and specifically created for this purpose"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1978449842352349509) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-15T13:16Z 1776 followers, 5939 engagements


"@NickSzabo4 @adam3us @bar_dictum @satflation @zamir591582 @jabulanijakes @BitMEXResearch Adam was blissfully unaware until yesterday that Marathon does active content moderation of the txs they accept out of band with Slipstream"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979898547571945886) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T13:12Z 1776 followers, 23.5K engagements


"The groundwork actually started in 2022 a year before the first waves of spam. The readme of the project was rewritten from "Bitcoin is an experimental digital currency that enables instant payments to anyone anywhere in the world. ." to "Bitcoin Core is a full node implementation for the Bitcoin P2P network""  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980051670684803582) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T23:21Z 1776 followers, 2345 engagements


"Again I was repeatedly assured this was already possible way before "the OP_RETURN upgrade" as spammers are calling Core v30"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1978848454685188434) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-16T15:40Z 1769 followers, 5386 engagements


"@giacomozucco @_DavidSFreeman @coinjoined @start9labs @adam3us @_MattHill_ I think it deserves its own mention because I've come to believe that this substandard economic reasoning is at the root of the disagreement. If you're worried about miners "not having enough income" then it's rational to promote all sorts of spam and dubious uses of blockspace"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979110931285028893) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-17T09:03Z 1769 followers, XXX engagements


"@14g23h34 @Du_Bi_Bo @stephanlivera You have it in practice. In the last X years the only things of substance that anyone shipped in Bitcoin land were the BitAxe firmware and the DATUM protocol"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979308146381258773) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-17T22:06Z 1769 followers, XX engagements


"Interesting take. I maintain that the mempool was designed for creating block templates because Satoshi's initial idea was that the "full node" and the "miner" were the same package. Block templates are created by the miners own software not by the protocol itself I'm only aware of Core/Knots GetBlockTemplate RPC call do you know of other software for creating block templates I don't think GBT existed since the beginning it was an early BIP"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980009082821242960) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T20:32Z 1774 followers, XX engagements


"There's also that weird tidbit where Wladimir closed the original PR saying "Closing this this was a bad idea I'm sorry" but X weeks later the same changes were included in another PR and he ACKed them without explaining why he changed his mind. Later on in February '23 he resigned as lead maintainer of Core and no replacement was appointed"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980053833116946574) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T23:29Z 1776 followers, XXX engagements


"Definitely the USG can legally compel Foundry and Marathon to enforce OFAC compliance. And they will code it up themselves to continue existing. This is completely immaterial to whether Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Knots (the open source projects) have (or not have) settings to filter unconfirmed txs with arbitrary data or that pay low mining fees"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979290928432214098) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-17T20:58Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"@Cipherhoodlum @_DavidSFreeman @giacomozucco @soloyopee @adam3us @csuwildcat @coinjoined @start9labs @_MattHill_ All these people are making a career of pretending to not understand simple things"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979507561100664915) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-18T11:19Z 1772 followers, XX engagements


"@the_charlatan_ @PortlandHODL Can you find me an example of a comment in that PR that goes along the lines of "ACK. This change will be very controversial and will cost Core a lot of its users but it should be done anyway.""  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979569014239003027) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-18T15:23Z 1772 followers, XX engagements


"@KenobiGeneral5 🤔"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979946727302946958) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T16:24Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"According to both Core and Knots documentation (or lack thereof) inscriptions are pure Bitcoin script (code) and OP_RETURNs pure arbitrary data. That defense may or may not work in the case of inscriptions. But it will SURELY not work for OP_RETURNs since Core's documentation literally says "this is the sanctioned method for anon people to pay to put up to 100KB of CSAM onchain""  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979987902193954851) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T19:07Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"Remember the arbitrariness of the Samourai and Tornado Cash devs prosecutions. If you feel 100000% sure that Bitcoin Core sanctioning large chunks of arbitrary data embedding as an officially supported use case of the Bitcoin network won't have any consequences you're full of shit. And CSAM in node runners hard drives is not even the worse threat: it's the increased likelihood that Stratum v1 pools will start actively moderating the contents of the txs received from the P2P network. This would very likely be the prelude of a XX% attack that nails the coffin of Bitcoin's true censorship"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1973504616055841077) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-01T21:45Z 1770 followers, 20.8K engagements


"Agreed. People who understand Bitcoin's value proposition (global censorship resistant payments & inflation resistant currency) don't have "seamless UX experience" as their highest priority. Fixing the longstanding problems of the L1 (chiefly mining centralization) is much more important than scaling. Thank God someone is seriously working on solving this"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979597696773103635) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-18T17:17Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"I didn't miss anything. When Liquid Spark Tether and whoever else start censoring the payments of their userbase I will still be able to spend my onchain UTXOs however I want. But only if Foundry and AntPool are not compelled into XX% attacking the network. Defusing the Stratum v1 bomb is much more important to me as a Bitcoin user"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979601061464711580) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-18T17:30Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"I don't share this narrative. The onchain network is settling trillions of $ of value each year (even though we peaked in 2021). The public lightning network currently has 3750 BTC locked in it for a market cap of about $400M. For the LN to settle as much value as onchain did last year ($19.2T) it would need to settle 48300 times its own market cap in micropayments. Not likely considering that onchain is "only" able to settle XX to XX times its own market cap every year and some of its payments can be in the billions of dollars. Onchain sees a lot more usage than any L2 and its problems are"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979615698297970790) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-18T18:28Z 1771 followers, XXX engagements


"@notgrubles Code it. Let's see if it gets adoption"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979950539505910065) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T16:39Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"@stephanlivera @wyatt_earp X. All mempools are private. X. The number of large (83 bytes) op_returns that end up onchain was still negligible as recently as last month"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979965840159064426) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T17:40Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"@cguida6 Do you really need a mempool to relay a tx to your peers once your node receives it I'd say the purpose of the mempool is to build block templates for hashing"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979968101639708673) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T17:49Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"@stephanlivera @wyatt_earp Yes. It can be argued that up to Core v30 the reference client resisted arbitrary data. Even inscriptions are data tortured to look like Bitcoin script and trick the interpreter. Starting from Core v30 the client is officially an open file server as well as a cryptocurrency"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979977141749010437) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T18:25Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"@BitcoinErrorLog Filling the blocks with arbitrary data is just a denial of service attack. The only thing shitcoiners manage to do is to drive out economic activity from Bitcoin. Which incidentally is the only thing that can keep it working long term (post subsidy)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979980479701864706) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T18:38Z 1772 followers, 1503 engagements


"@GregTonoski @cguida6 My point is that from a programming perspective you could do this without keeping the tx around in the mempool. Relay and forget. But to build fresh block templates constantly you do need the mempool (or more generally a cache of unconfirmed txs no need to be in RAM)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979983996764242420) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T18:52Z 1772 followers, XX engagements


"Nonsense. The purpose of the OP_RETURN on release was just to abort script execution with a failure to make an output provably unspendable. The sad fact that the consensus rules accept up to 1MB of arbitrary data after it wasn't discovered until years later and the opcode wasn't officially repurposed for embedding very small chunks of arbitrary data until 2014. The rationale at the time was to stop people from encoding data in bare multisig addresses. But as history has shown (and I said earlier): every new vector of abuse that is opened will be exploited"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979986287290380400) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T19:01Z 1772 followers, XX engagements


"@the_charlatan_ @BitcoinErrorLog $27.7T more efficient in 2023 compared to 2022 😂 What is the nature of those changes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1979992464321663400) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T19:26Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"@wyatt_earp @stephanlivera He thinks "nothing can be done about it" so might as well help the spammers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980000212056744327) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T19:56Z 1772 followers, XX engagements


"@cguida6 The mempool exists since the first release of Bitcoin (I think) and initially nodes were supposed to be used to "generate coins". It seems to me that during 2011-2016 they were rather useless on most nodes until Compact Block Relay was widely deployed"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980003203304267909) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T20:08Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"I maintain that the primary purpose of a mempool is to build block templates. CBR is nice and can help save bandwidth but it's still something that was tacked on top afterwards. In the era of the BitAxe and DATUM there's absolutely no reason for any node to not be a mining node. If this catches on and becomes part of the "culture" in the future there will be more options for noderunners to command more hashrate than just a few Th/s (hashrate markets)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980005269871509528) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T20:16Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"Can you elaborate on this I'm definitely excited about all of the free-market ways we can solve mining centralization. Look into NiceHash. It's basically a service where you can use bitcoin it to pay for a certain amount of hashrate delivered over a certain period of time and you point it anywhere you want (a pool or your DATUM Gateway). I think the future of mining will look like that if bitcoiners understand that its up to them to hash to maintain the system. The market will split into hash providers that will sell it on the open market and hashrate buyers (bitcoiners). Hosting companies"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980011558643097929) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T20:41Z 1772 followers, XXX engagements


"@Cipherhoodlum @cguida6 This explanation seems very focused on non-mining nodes and a bit hand-wavy on the mining part. until it is accepted into a block. And how does that happen Because mining nodes are building block templates from their mempools"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980016960822731064) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T21:03Z 1772 followers, XX engagements


"@notgrubles @MiyamotoClan Not true Slipstream and similar services are moderated. The P2P relay network isn't"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980044335224701320) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T22:52Z 1772 followers, XX engagements


"@satflation "At this point I don't think it is not up to this project to prescribe what Bitcoin is. If you mean a description I am wondering what the goal of it would be considering that (likely) anyone finding this project would already know about Bitcoin.""  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980052477325328744) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-19T23:24Z 1776 followers, XXX engagements


"@calibrated_lies @satflation Read next tweet. X weeks later Marco Falke included the changes in another PR that went through"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980178501488820515) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-20T07:45Z 1776 followers, XX engagements


"@satflation Subversion happens one small step at a time"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980065385400733721) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-20T00:15Z 1776 followers, XX engagements


"@ndgo1370 Certainly a lot of devs have expressed views that Bitcoin is just yet another blockchain/cryptocurrency"  
[X Link](https://x.com/oomahq/status/1980587120499822895) [@oomahq](/creator/x/oomahq) 2025-10-21T10:49Z 1776 followers, XX engagements