[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@mononautical Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1386812674156253196.png) @mononautical mononaut

mononaut posts on X about bitcoin, twitter, transactions, state of the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1386812674156253196/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXXX +156%
- X Months XXXXXXXXX +2%
- X Year XXXXXXXXX -XX%

### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1386812674156253196/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week XX +129%
- X Month XX +100%
- X Months XXX +62%
- X Year XXX -XX%

### Followers: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1386812674156253196/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXXXXX +0.41%
- X Month XXXXXX +0.54%
- X Months XXXXXX +7.90%
- X Year XXXXXX +20%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1386812674156253196/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/influence)
---

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  XXXX% [finance](/list/finance)  XXXX% [social networks](/list/social-networks)  XXXX% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  XXXX% [countries](/list/countries)  XXXX% [travel destinations](/list/travel-destinations)  XXXX%

**Social topic influence**
[bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) #6171, [twitter](/topic/twitter) 0.65%, [transactions](/topic/transactions) 0.65%, [state of](/topic/state-of) 0.65%, [tx](/topic/tx) 0.65%, [spam](/topic/spam) 0.65%, [strategic reserve](/topic/strategic-reserve) 0.65%, [el salvador](/topic/el-salvador) 0.65%, [salvador](/topic/salvador) 0.65%, [miner](/topic/miner) XXXX%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@peterktodd](/creator/undefined) [@nurinuri24533](/creator/undefined) [@theinstagibbs](/creator/undefined) [@ajtowns](/creator/undefined) [@owenkemeys](/creator/undefined) [@lukedashjr](/creator/undefined) [@satflation](/creator/undefined) [@w_s_bitcoin](/creator/undefined) [@btctogether](/creator/undefined) [@rot13maxi](/creator/undefined) [@gm7t2](/creator/undefined) [@embii4u](/creator/undefined) [@cryptoquick](/creator/undefined) [@stutxo](/creator/undefined) [@bearaware4](/creator/undefined) [@orangesurfbtc](/creator/undefined) [@blockcryptology](/creator/undefined) [@thatwagmigirl](/creator/undefined) [@kiawtzin](/creator/undefined) [@adamamcbride](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin)
### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Bitcoin Core v30 is not priced in"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1974674794332479549) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-05T03:15Z 20.7K followers, 14.9K engagements


"somehow I missed this Clementine kickoff transaction hitting mainnet last week 👀"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1976987821656490245) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-11T12:26Z 20.7K followers, 33.3K engagements


"unfortunately "I Can't Believe it's Knot Bitcoin" doesn't fit in a twitter poll"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978309805413405042) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-15T03:59Z 20.7K followers, 2603 engagements


"@stutxo goddammit first Bitcoin Inquisition and now this 😩"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978310732941820235) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-15T04:03Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements


"@GrassFedBitcoin @OrangeSurfBTC afaik this is the first time I've had a straight answer and Luke hid my tweet rather than respond to a slightly different question. I ask because it seems wildly reckless to promote DATUM without any safeguards while consensus rules allow "completely insane" transactions"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978337217773801777) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-15T05:48Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements


"@MarketAnarchy21 abandoned dust"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978793989089440089) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T12:03Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements


"@osborne_sam uh oh"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978651521916219407) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T02:37Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements


"2.73% to 146.72T the first negative adjustment in over XXX days bringing the difficulty back below 150T although network hashrate remains comfortably above X Zetahash/s"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978706675092595116) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T06:16Z 20.7K followers, 1406 engagements


"@byronhambly a multiple of the effective fee rate of the transaction that creates it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978739278482907396) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T08:26Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements


"@utxoclub @LukeDashjr @privacymatter21 I think Luke might argue that unless the revelation was in a block the data isn't really "on bitcoin" and the indistinguishable transaction alone isn't spam. and that you could detect and filter such a revelation tx itself to maintain that state of affairs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978793173515432257) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T12:00Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements


"El Salvador's Bitcoin Office just migrated their Strategic Reserve holdings into XX new addresses with up to XXX BTC per UTXO. This marks the transition to a new wallet management strategy aiming to avoid address reuse"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1961575881501221171) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-08-29T23:45Z 20.7K followers, 134.3K engagements


"this transaction embeds a 57.3kb animated gif across 1859 fake P2WSH outputs. lucky it wasn't in an op_return"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1974493719719268610) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-04T15:16Z 20.7K followers, 251.2K engagements


"we should urgently soft-fork to ban zero-valued inputs and outputs by consensus for the sake of my poor transaction flow diagram 😭"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1976987902736580946) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-11T12:27Z 20.7K followers, 10.1K engagements


"Time-traveling blocks No not really - Mempool displays the self-reported timestamp set by the miner which by consensus is allowed to drift up to two hours into the future or back to the median timestamps of the previous XX blocks"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977950610457833901) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-14T04:12Z 20.7K followers, 22.2K engagements


"momentum is building but we still need a name"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978309485757116583) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-15T03:58Z 20.7K followers, 21.8K engagements


"the dust limit is so cooked"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978458096390283475) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-15T13:49Z 20.7K followers, 114.2K engagements


"OP_TANK_RETURN finally got mined"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978642155083280813) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T02:00Z 20.7K followers, 19.7K engagements


"the more I think about it the more I like the idea of a demurrage soft-fork: a minimum "storage fee" to spend a UTXO increasing with age once the fee exceeds the value of the UTXO it becomes unspendable and can be pruned from the UTXO set not retroactive so non-confiscatory"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978663487044743458) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T03:25Z 20.7K followers, 9087 engagements


"all very reasonable objections the blocksize limit is the pricing mechanism we have to allocate space in the historical blockchain data that every full node has to download and validate. the utxoset is a more costly resource (needs fast random access) and the size sets a lower bound on the storage requirements for a pruned node. but we don't have a coherent pricing mechanism to allocate space in the utxoset and as a result it has massively expanded in recent years (in the same way that any community-subsidized resource gets abused by freeloaders). if you can think of a more acceptable"  
[X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1979010127182336024) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-17T02:22Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements