[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@kdoggo1181074 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1831350837500641280.png) @kdoggo1181074 CatDog

CatDog posts on X about chainge, kas, kaspa, telegram the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1831350837500641280/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1831350837500641280/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXX +249%
- X Month XXXXXX +44%
- X Months XXXXXXX +7,957%

### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1831350837500641280/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1831350837500641280/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Month XX -XX%
- X Months XXX +411%

### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1831350837500641280/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1831350837500641280/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXXXX +0.24%
- X Month XXXXX +0.16%
- X Months XXXXX +975%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1831350837500641280/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1831350837500641280/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1831350837500641280/influence)
---

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  XXXXX% [exchanges](/list/exchanges)  XXXXX% [social networks](/list/social-networks)  XXXXX% [stocks](/list/stocks)  XXXX% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  XXXX%

**Social topic influence**
[chainge](/topic/chainge) #5, [kas](/topic/kas) #462, [kaspa](/topic/kaspa) #322, [telegram](/topic/telegram) 10.34%, [contracts](/topic/contracts) #377, [finance](/topic/finance) 6.9%, [usdt](/topic/usdt) #1978, [on x](/topic/on-x) #944, [$375m](/topic/$375m) #20, [mexc](/topic/mexc) #516

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@cholly](/creator/undefined) [@krcbot](/creator/undefined) [@financechainge](/creator/undefined) [@coffeebreakyt](/creator/undefined) [@coinbase](/creator/undefined) [@tbdaiofficial](/creator/undefined) [@cryptojarus](/creator/undefined) [@biteonkas](/creator/undefined) [@extriage](/creator/undefined) [@exrafaelsousa](/creator/undefined) [@bitebots](/creator/undefined) [@maksimvalkov83](/creator/undefined) [@hereisbanana](/creator/undefined) [@goonboycrypto](/creator/undefined) [@moxypixy15683](/creator/undefined) [@sunsoulprivee](/creator/undefined) [@connection373](/creator/undefined) [@danphil248310](/creator/undefined) [@kasfyi](/creator/undefined) [@cryptok777](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Chainge (XCHNG)](/topic/chainge) [Kaspa (KAS)](/topic/kaspa) [Ethereum (ETH)](/topic/ethereum) [Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN)](/topic/coinbase) [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin)
### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1831350837500641280/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"I know that @KrcBot is working hard to bring his project @TBDai_Official to completion and it appears many L1 KRC20 transactions which support miners are a result of TBDAI. Why not reinstate the token's visibility and clarify the metrics displayed and where you think they fall short I'm not a member of the TBDAI project but some clarifications are warranted"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1977798497836355964) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-13T18:08Z 1258 followers, XXX engagements


"@KrcBot @Cryptojarus @kasfyi @TBDai_Official @cryptok777 given the recent discussions (see above) can you clarify: did you really remove TBDAI only because of a single request from @Cryptojarus or were others involved in that push given the criticism of censorship will you reconsider your position"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1978168750818934946) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-14T18:39Z 1258 followers, XX engagements


"1/3 Weve archived and published the full message history from the Chainge Finance Global Telegram. It includes all admin posts (including DJ Qian) surrounding the wKAS bridge shutdown liquidity claims and user losses"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1927537196346511662) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-05-28T01:27Z 1260 followers, 1304 engagements


"1/5 Chainge Flow Analysis After extensive tracing of Kaspa flows from @FinanceChainge to centralized exchanges (CEXes) we've built a verified shell-graph of the transfer network. The result shows how 318M $KAS flowed from Chainge Intermediaries CEX"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1929550259467755580) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-06-02T14:46Z 1260 followers, 9460 engagements


"2/The Ethereum tx they cite is: 0xb0a9131823ba507f1b2f884cf48ebaf437ac5c3fe8e27935fdd17999edb494db Sent $51412.16 USDT from wallet 0x25f7a7BC7A5914420794Ff034Cdf5a1A27a67b9E to the Chainge bridge contract: 0x66ff2f0ac3214758d1e61b16b41e3d5e62caecf1"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1944957645317959853) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-07-15T03:10Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"DJ Qian (Chainge Finance) @djqianfusion @FinanceChainge just announced in a Telegram group (not on X) that $3.75M in personal funds will begin compensating stuck users starting August X distributed over XX days. His plan sounds familiar. . . (possibly because he announced such plans many times before)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1950587470925496535) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-07-30T16:01Z 1260 followers, 5915 engagements


"Despite the announcement no on-chain evidence suggests Chainge is preparing for wKAS redemptions: No ETH or KAS reserves visible The wrapped KAS contract still shows 93M wKAS minted Main bridge wallet on Kaspa (kaspa:qqwvnkp47wsj6n4hkdlgj8dsauyx0xvefunnwvvsmpq2udd0ka8ckmpuqw3k5): X KAS Last USDT "injection" was sent to Binance"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1950587473035182138) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-07-30T16:01Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"Even if $3.75M is real and distributed: Thats XX% of whats needed to fully back wKAS at parity No plan shared for who gets compensated first No mechanism for bridging back to native KAS No on-chain proof-of-reserves. No transparency"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1950587474591260901) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-07-30T16:01Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"All of this was announced only in Telegram not on X or Chainges official channels. Thats a red flag. It keeps the message isolated and avoids scrutiny while still giving hope to desperate users whove been waiting for 8+ months"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1950587476235678174) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-07-30T16:01Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"Reminder: past analysis found Chainge offloaded 86-314M KAS to MEXC. Last estimated they had only 15M33M KAS left across all known Chainge-funded wallets - a small fraction of whats needed to restore the bridge. Liquidity appears gone"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1950587477795930574) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-07-30T16:01Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"6/ Bottom line: After removing service/ops funders (CRECIP CoinEx Chainge) there are no multi-minter high-confidence clusters. The data do not support the claim that one actor minted with many wallets. Some minters received KAS from CRECIP but as part of normal service (e.g. through Knot) fan-out not evidence of control"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1963359159510024426) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-09-03T21:51Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"re CRECIP wallet linked to chainge - minters: Funding activity was heaviest in Feb-Mar 2025 (almost XX% of all volume). By July 2025 CRECIP was still sending to minters but at reduced amounts. No sends after July XX 2025. So the bulk seems to have occurred while Knot was at least partly operational -- user-initiated not Chainge"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1963391905665819007) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-09-04T00:01Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"@fkthematrixx @FinanceChainge @KrcBot @KasperoLabs @KaspaCalls reach out to @Cholly"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1967966187347907033) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-09-16T14:57Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"@Cholly @coffeebreak_YT @coinbase some of the analysis of @FinanceChainge Kaspa sent - MEXC is detailed here: . . . Note that Chainge off-loading customer assets to CEX was not limited to Kas"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1972830021569093654) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-09-30T01:05Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"7/ Why this matters: Knot/Chainge-linked wallets (kaspa:qz9cqmddjppjyth8rngevfs767m5nvm0480nlgs5ve8d6aegv4g9xzu2tgg0u) still hold large amounts of KRC-20 tokens likely user liquidity. Because there were no smart contracts users cant withdraw them. Those assets should be returned"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1982171594358173902) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T19:45Z 1260 followers, XX engagements


"I wanted to check: @RunOnFlux you didn't launch this Flux token on @moonboundgg if not someone is using your platform's name for a pump/dump token"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1981905041062768656) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T02:05Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"2/ Most already knew @FinanceChainge and were centralized. What wasnt known is how their swaps really worked. They werent atomic decentralized trades: they were server-coordinated custodial swaps designed to look atomic"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1982171582949708184) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T19:45Z 1260 followers, XX engagements


"3/ Kaspa L1 has no smart contracts so true DEX swaps were impossible. Instead Chainge created an off-chain matching engine that simulated swaps through coordinated L1 transactions"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1982171587794063757) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T19:45Z 1260 followers, XX engagements


"4/ Heres what actually happened: X You send a KRC20 (sold) to the Chainge/Knot wallet (kaspa:qz9cqmddjppjyth8rngevfs767m5nvm0480nlgs5ve8d6aegv4g9xzu2tgg0u). X Chainge's backend spawned a temporary one-use wallet. X Chainge/Knot wallet sent XXX KAS to the temporary wallet. X In the next transaction the temporary wallet returned the XXX KAS to Chainge and the other (bought) KRC20 was transferred to you. No smart contract. Just centralized bookkeeping"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1982171589580902782) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T19:45Z 1260 followers, XX engagements


"5/ We found hundreds of these one-use wallets associated with a single user wallet each active once sending XXXX KAS. When shut down in Aug 2025 these ping-return patterns disappeared. Thats on-chain proof the DEX was fully backend-driven"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1982171591371866143) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T19:45Z 1260 followers, XX engagements


"6/ Despite public claims theres no sign of Fusion or DCRM technology here. No distributed custody no threshold signatures no cross-chain logic: only synchronized L1 transfers managed by Chainges servers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1982171592881733994) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T19:45Z 1260 followers, XX engagements


"9/ So whether its a simulated DEX like or a bridge like Kurve the risk is the same: Decentralization in name centralization in control. Until Kasplex's infrastructure is open verifiable and community-run caution is warranted"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1982171600322433318) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T19:45Z 1260 followers, XX engagements


"10/ Our analysis used KRC-20 + Kaspa L1 data: XXX KAS ping-return transactions One-use wallets KRC20-KRC20 swaps Activity ending in August 2025 Together they reveal how actually worked as a Chainge-operated custodial swap relay"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1982171601756905652) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T19:45Z 1260 followers, XX engagements


"1/ This thread began after an anonymous Kaspa community member asked: How did actually operate as a DEX if Kaspa has no smart contracts So I investigated. Heres what was found and what it reveals about Chainge and now @kasplex"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1982171581255180362) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T19:45Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"Junny don't you think more people would support Kasplex if it was open-sourced decentralized & allowed the community to run nodes more bridges - more competitive fees - but need more transparency first those are not illegitimate concerns - many would like to see the risks addressed - and were enthusiastic about the new capabilities brought through EVM-compatibility"  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1982177514861584481) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T20:08Z 1260 followers, XXX engagements


"@KrcBot @oneforonehaha @oisinlee @Ledger I believe thats called Kaspa (fast) but Slpw Bitcoin qualifies too. . "  
[X Link](https://x.com/kdoggo1181074/status/1982221211745599810) [@kdoggo1181074](/creator/x/kdoggo1181074) 2025-10-25T23:02Z 1260 followers, XX engagements