[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@giacomozucco Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::338410478.png) @giacomozucco Giacomo Distributed-AuthoritariPuritan Zucco⚡️🌋🧀

Giacomo Distributed-AuthoritariPuritan Zucco⚡️🌋🧀 posts on X about bitcoin, wars, solana, ethereum the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::338410478/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::338410478/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXXX +5.40%
- X Months XXXXXXXXX -XXXX%
- X Year XXXXXXXXX -XX%

### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::338410478/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::338410478/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XXX +36%
- X Months XXX +34%
- X Year XXX -XX%

### Followers: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::338410478/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::338410478/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXXXXX +0.07%
- X Month XXXXXX +0.50%
- X Months XXXXXX +4.40%
- X Year XXXXXX +14%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::338410478/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::338410478/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::338410478/influence)
---

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  XXXX% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  XXXX% [celebrities](/list/celebrities)  XXXX% [musicians](/list/musicians)  XXXX% [social networks](/list/social-networks)  XXXX% [finance](/list/finance)  XXXX%

**Social topic influence**
[bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) #3090, [wars](/topic/wars) #1814, [solana](/topic/solana) 1.89%, [ethereum](/topic/ethereum) 1.89%, [taylor swift](/topic/taylor-swift) 1.89%, [memecoin](/topic/memecoin) 1.89%, [stuck in](/topic/stuck-in) 1.89%, [all the](/topic/all-the) 1.89%, [should be](/topic/should-be) 1.89%, [supported](/topic/supported) XXXX%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@walkeramerica](/creator/undefined) [@adam3us](/creator/undefined) [@r0ckstardev](/creator/undefined) [@luganoplanb](/creator/undefined) [@uglyoldgoat1](/creator/undefined) [@stephanlivera](/creator/undefined) [@planb_network](/creator/undefined) [@mirbtc](/creator/undefined) [@efenigson](/creator/undefined) [@btcbenchmark](/creator/undefined) [@sbaaaam21](/creator/undefined) [@highstakevegas](/creator/undefined) [@forsatbid](/creator/undefined) [@jabulanijakes](/creator/undefined) [@mtoshi21er](/creator/undefined) [@excellion](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoinollie](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoinerrorlog](/creator/undefined) [@oomahq](/creator/undefined) [@knutsvanholm](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [Solana (SOL)](/topic/solana) [Ethereum (ETH)](/topic/ethereum)
### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::338410478/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Nah not really. I think he may be emotionally biased by the fact the guys screwing all this up bad are friends of his friends and there isn't really a way to defend the fact that his friends are defending their friends without piling on Luke demonization and OCEAN conspiracy theories. But besides his tones most of the things he's saying on the specifics seem correct: - no rational at all to go beyond 150b or such with op_return - mistakes were made by Core in terms of governance - mempool filtering is also about signaling to spammers which has a role besides technical effects - mempool"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1967835111224680927) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-09-16T06:17Z 83.2K followers, XXX engagements


"@barackomaba Yes. A talk that was basically the promotion of Solana Ethereum and the Taylor Swift memecoin (really)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1973348721128776133) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-01T11:26Z 83.2K followers, 1127 engagements


"May not be effective but it seems the most efficient. Rewriting Bitcoin nodes from absolute scratch reaching the same level of review and the same experience while also avoiding consensus failures in a system with no formal specs would be certainly more effective but so costly that it would be completely inefficient when the goal is just to send some people to fuck off"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1979475722700820949) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-18T09:12Z 83.2K followers, 19.1K engagements


"@BitMEXResearch Most of the code is not written by the people who the message is targeted to. Most of the reasons the message exists has little to do with the code itself"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1979482145530761461) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-18T09:38Z 83.2K followers, 16.7K engagements


"@reardencode @WalkerAmerica @LuganoPlanB @rumblevideo @PrincFilip1 @BoHines @aurore_btc @Zhaslan_Madiyev @sebastiankurz @Beiwatch1 @paoloardoino @MarcusGerhardt2 @BlackrockNeuro_ @MrWinMarshall @Holepunch_to @QVAC_tether @sunnago @GabrielShipton @adam3us @jackmallers @PrestonPysh @starkness @jimmysong @peterktodd @stephanlivera @GrassFedBitcoin @cryptoquick @bradmillscan I was not there or I would have"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1982205873112981866) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-25T22:01Z 83.2K followers, XXX engagements


"@geekboyireland @mir_btc @LuganoPlanB @planb_network :D"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1982448549674545315) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-26T14:05Z 83.2K followers, XXX engagements


"Sorry but I frankly consider the spam debate more interesting than the last tired remnants of onchain maximalism in 2025. And I say this as somebody very tired about the spam debate. I which I shared your enthusiasm with the fact that two person with LN derangement syndrome are still invited to speak at conferences but I just can't bring myself to find that so relevant: it's mostly due to past influence (Sztork with truthcoin blog Carvalho with blocksize war role)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983460151597109670) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-29T09:05Z 83.2K followers, XX engagements


"@stephanlivera @moneyball Everything seems to connect through LN but there will be other systems too I think it's useful to define those system as other from dryja-poon channels but not from the LN itself. They are all part of it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983468015120502934) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-29T09:36Z 83.2K followers, XXX engagements


"Market consequences: economic losses for the magazine due to the negligence which caused discomfort to readers (possibly reduced by good faith efforts to recall/apologize/compensate). Tort consequence: some enforced compensation from the offending editor due to the contract breach (plus hopefully ostracism from job market for him). Criminal law: fair trial ending up in proportional physical punishment for the pedo editor (and/or other identified perpetrators in the image) fitting the crime of rape (since children can't consent to sex definition of rape) possibly converted in compensation to"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983223010653024296) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-28T17:23Z 83.2K followers, XX engagements


"Centralization is efficient. Until it's not. That's why Bitcoin&P2P"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1980625828791873936) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-21T13:22Z 83.2K followers, 56.8K engagements


"I defend and will keep defending this guy allright on many many things: all the things I honestly think he should be defended about. Not others. Specifically I disagree that not running a consensus fork to eliminate some specific type of encoding of some specific content equals explicitly "defending" such content: - I may not run the fork simply because I don't see a relevant difference between that encoding format and others already possible and find the distinction irrelevant - I may not run the fork simply because I don't agree with easily conceding to criminal organizations like"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983087626748940462) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-28T08:25Z 83.2K followers, 2187 engagements


"Email isn't Bitcoin because it's global consensus thus more span prone. Email as a proticol has no central relay. All content is obviously subjective but content in Email is supported while in Bitcoin it's not it's just overlaid on it. Email is not free to send: it requires a computer electricity etc. Bitcoin also isn't free but it's cheaper for spam: with the cost of a single block inclusion you force all future users to download and distribute the data forever. Bitcoin and Email are both distributed and decentralized. Bitcoin and Email both validates math not meaning (an email following"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983445061216989570) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-29T08:05Z 83.2K followers, XX engagements


"@ndeet @Dennis06277978 @simulx4 @stephanlivera @highstakevegas Freenet is a decentralized storage protocol. Pretty cool for censorship resistance but implementation is a fat/heavy java thing and there's no incentive layer. Zeronet was an experiment to match it with Bitcoin but all onchain. We can do better"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983569108902760702) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-29T16:18Z 83.2K followers, XXX engagements


"@mir_btc on stage now with universisty professors and students"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1982019212974374967) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-25T09:39Z 83.2K followers, 4028 engagements


"@Dig_A_Hash_Kid @roryhighside @rleder @NickSzabo4 Yes all media representing (real)/NAP violations inherently involve NAP violations. Even videos of Hiroshima nuke explosion. Yes rape is definitely a NAP violation. Yes I do what I can for hash wars (not much but honest job)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983223599348449348) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-28T17:25Z 83.2K followers, XX engagements


"@RainDogDance @_DavidSFreeman Agreed. Complaining about Nyms in Bitcoin is beyond cringe"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983228235878932711) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-28T17:43Z 83.2K followers, XX engagements


"@dlllllllllllI @stephanlivera @highstakevegas Uh I don't find trace of such a worry in this specific conversation (btw it's not bad to worry about govs coming after Bitcoin for any kind of pretext including that 2018 encoding: users should move to safer jurisdictions run nodes on Tor curate opsec in general)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983245079004274693) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-28T18:50Z 83.2K followers, XX engagements


"@zer0_dt_ @callebtc Too bad for them then since we haven't small blocks anymore. :("  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983544554465660965) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-29T14:40Z 83.2K followers, XX engagements


"This is a very important point by uncle @r0ckstardev. Bitcoin would likely survive CoreV30 being widely adopted and some nasty attackers eventually encoding illegal stuff into large standard op_returns. Bitcoin would likely survive Knots&al taking over Core and the current main maintainers being "fired" (and the same nasty attackers still eventually encoding illegal stuff into large non-standard op_returns anyway). Bitcoin would likely survive ossifying now and never ever getting a new non-bug-fixing soft fork forcing us to use heavily interactive L2s and leaving midwits sleepless over"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1965662903404572883) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-09-10T06:25Z 83.2K followers, 146.8K engagements


"The very first Lugano Plan Week (officially launched last Monday) will enter its hottest phase tomorrow culminating with the 4th Lugano Plan Forum: I will now suspend my Twitter interactions until them beside maybe some random RT. If you really really want to come to tell me which node implementation I should run or how should I set my datacarriersize you can come and tell it to my face at most of these events every day until Monday 27th. After that I'll probably fall into a coma until the Bitcoin Histrico conference in El Salvador. Y'all behave. Stack sats. Avoid KYC. Run a node. Maybe grind"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1979864335770951990) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-19T10:56Z 83.2K followers, 25.7K engagements


"BTW who sets the filters Users. Possibly trusting some class of developers. Which is exactly the way filters work now in Bitcoin Core. What if they get the filters wrong They change their mind and set new filters. In the meantime transactions with high demand still make it on chain with preferential peering as explained very well by many Core devs. Can the filter authority itself represent a centralisation risk Yes. Right now Core defaults are the filter authority. It can represent a centralization risk but very minor due to the weak consequences of filtering. Any movement of such authority"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1982692406001647880) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-27T06:14Z 83.2K followers, 7803 engagements


"@stephanlivera @highstakevegas Email is different - it's not that one person letting an email thru lets it thru for everyone. Yep. That's what makes Bitcoin way more spam prone than email: a single inclusion will force literally all future users to be spammed literally forever"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983226505200021961) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-28T17:37Z 83.2K followers, XXX engagements


"@simulx4 @stephanlivera @highstakevegas Bitcoin fees are not hashcash. In hashcash each message has to do PoW to be received once by one recipient. In Bitcoin one single inclusion fee will force literally all users to receive it forever and redundate it for free"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983293502256808393) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-28T22:03Z 83.2K followers, XXX engagements


"Precisely. I'm also for block size reduction soft fork (possibly witness discount removal plus CISA but also 300k would be OK: onchain stuff is terrible for cost/time UX privacy censorship resistance MEVil etc. as much of the Bitcoin economy as possible should move offchain)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983438257317646531) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-29T07:38Z 83.2K followers, XXX engagements


"@_DavidSFreeman @byronhambly FUDing one of the most important projects for Bitcoin mining decentralization is quite a big mole hill. What is the mountain I'm not challenging Is my position about XXX anywhow unclear Do you feel XXX has widespread support and I have to focus on it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983466566135197801) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-29T09:30Z 83.2K followers, XX engagements


"I've seen X minutes as I said. This clip: Tadje explained that alleged "LN problems" incentivizing custody are actually just Bitcoin problems. Sztork ignores the point and goes on ranting about some unrelated philosophical tention between cypherpunk code and companies and mentions shitcoin company Bitpay or something as example of something. Then he repeats to Tadje.Tadje's own calculations about the blockspace needed to hypothetically onboard all users with Dryja-Poon channels only. Tadge agrees with himself of course and alluded to other solutions (some of them in production right now)."  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983469845585736069) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-29T09:43Z 83.2K followers, XXX engagements


"@copinmalin @sajlegreat @darosior @callebtc Bandwidth & validation didn't keep the pace with IBD and they are both likely to get worse in case of global wars and societal collapse (scenarios where Bitcoin becomes even more important)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/giacomozucco/status/1983570642474557453) [@giacomozucco](/creator/x/giacomozucco) 2025-10-29T16:24Z 83.2K followers, XX engagements