[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@cryptosolv Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1856490323192803328.png) @cryptosolv Cryptosolv

Cryptosolv posts on X about $pls, $plsx, pulsechain, hex the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1856490323192803328/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1856490323192803328/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXXXX +64%
- X Month XXXXXXX +93%
- X Months XXXXXXXXX +171%
- X Year XXXXXXXXX +4,767%

### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1856490323192803328/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1856490323192803328/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XXX +56%
- X Months XXX +393%
- X Year XXX +12,983%

### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1856490323192803328/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1856490323192803328/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXXXX +4.90%
- X Month XXXXX +8.90%
- X Months XXXXX +93%
- X Year XXXXX +1,450%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1856490323192803328/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1856490323192803328/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  #983 [finance](/list/finance)  XXXX% [currencies](/list/currencies)  XXXX%

**Social topic influence**
[$pls](/topic/$pls) #1, [$plsx](/topic/$plsx) #1, [pulsechain](/topic/pulsechain) #2, [hex](/topic/hex) #72, [$hex](/topic/$hex) #2, [liquidity](/topic/liquidity) #268, [sac](/topic/sac) #64, [$eth](/topic/$eth) #122, [$13m](/topic/$13m) #4, [$dai](/topic/$dai) #9

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@rocketnick10](/creator/undefined) [@libertyswapfi](/creator/undefined) [@provexpool](/creator/undefined) [@provexcom](/creator/undefined) [@rgreen622](/creator/undefined) [@richardheartwin](/creator/undefined) [@benhpsauce](/creator/undefined) [@justsumdoodyo](/creator/undefined) [@bazbestos](/creator/undefined) [@hexetherealpump](/creator/undefined) [@remindmeofthis](/creator/undefined) [@heresjohnnywin](/creator/undefined) [@0xexecute](/creator/undefined) [@almighty5555](/creator/undefined) [@turntsalty](/creator/undefined) [@fundinggym](/creator/undefined) [@crypmvs](/creator/undefined) [@rackhamrishel](/creator/undefined) [@dcentraliseme](/creator/undefined) [@nineironcapital](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Pulsechain (PLS)](/topic/$pls) [PulseX (PLSX)](/topic/$plsx) [HexCube (HEX)](/topic/$hex) [Ethereum (ETH)](/topic/$eth) [Dai (DAI)](/topic/$dai) [USDC (USDC)](/topic/$usdc) [Woodcoin (LOG)](/topic/$log) [Lift Dollar (USDL)](/topic/$usdl) [WETH (WETH)](/topic/$weth) [BILL THE BEAR (BILL)](/topic/$bear) [Tether (USDT)](/topic/$usdt) [Monad (MON)](/topic/monad) [Caught in 4K (4K)](/topic/$4k)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Price of $PLS got you down There's a few wallets hammering it here at the lows and one of the major culprits is one we showcased in August - let's look at what's happened since then. Back in August we identified a large $PLS and $PLSX sac whale that had offloaded $13m (likely closer to $18m) from PulseChain so far but had run out of liquid capital and was down to just their validators. Their main validator wallet 0x939B45797A14071a25C5f4409E5F45e13F44cD39 had 3969 validators at the time of that analysis and as of today they're down to 3454 - a loss of XXX validators (approx 16.5b $PLS). That"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1995407450925895818)  2025-12-01T08:19Z 4422 followers, 11.3K engagements


"Today's $PLSX pump - an early post-mortem. Earlier today we saw $1.3m of $ETH and stables deployed predominantly into $PLSX (with some into $PLS) - the pump peaked at XX% followed by a drawdown of XX% (so far) - total net pump still sits at 31%. We analyzed the top XX net sellers of $PLSX to see who ruined some of the fun and whether they look like: 📉 Traders (stables/ETH) 📉 Traders (rotatoooors) 📉 Exit sellers Of those XX sellers between them they offloaded $280k of $PLSX broken down into the above categories they were: 📉 Traders (stables/ETH) - $72k (26%) 📉 Traders (rotatooors) - $198k"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997939811227992262)  2025-12-08T08:02Z 4430 followers, 24.2K engagements


"The wallet mentioned in the quoted post hasn't sold a thing since July until they just market dumped 20m $HEX and a little over 10m $eHEX in the last hour. Totally unpredictable (although maybe covering losses elsewhere from recent events) and a really good case example of why panic dumping and trying to front-run large end-stakes is a fruitless endeavour. The stake this is sourced from ended in Feb. As a side note there's 121m $HEX left in this wallet. They might dump it today they might slowly dump it over the next X years. Predicting it is impossible"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1976983305594847699)  2025-10-11T12:08Z 4395 followers, 6935 engagements


"$PLS price down Just another shitty trader back in action picked up most of these bags about 10-20% higher tried to borrow $USDL against their position and ultimately panic exited instead"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1988393164676452853)  2025-11-11T23:47Z 4414 followers, 8286 engagements


"The ridiculous token distribution and completely flawed tokenomics aside there are X things that aren't being talked about with this token. X The accumulated $wETH is entirely derived from the tax on the token selling $PLS for $wETH in effect creating $54k (17.9 $ETH as of right now) worth of additional sell pressure on $PLS since launch. X None of that $wETH has actually been sacced yet - "bro we're ranked #3" is totally irrelevant until that ETH actually hits the sac wallet. The owner of the wallet that the ETH is going to has to manually do this whenever they feel like it (and you better"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1991411895983841688)  2025-11-20T07:42Z 4413 followers, 16.3K engagements


"An update from the large validator that made a complete exit earlier this month. Since our last post they've sold around XX billion $PLS. Rain or shine green candles or red they just keep selling. A little over $266k $USDC bridged out (plus $20k $DAI currently un-claimed) in the last few weeks and just over 10b $PLS left to sell (valued at $193k at the time of posting). Bonus #sellpressure that the chain really didn't need in the current environment but a predictable pattern of behavior nonetheless"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1992846657021530194)  2025-11-24T06:44Z 4389 followers, 7257 engagements


"Hey @MatiAllin you forgot to make an update post after the $MATI liquidity was re-rugged a week later. This round of LP was put up by wallet 0x86f3a8b98909da9554336edc66300d28ee5c29c8 which received it's $MATI supply from 0x7f19a76e0074B2f4c5daEb24055F45f4727977D5. If you've followed along previously the 77D5 wallet is essentially the $MATI "OA" wallet (see spreadsheet in this post Several chunks of LP added with $PLSX in a 9inch V3 pool around XX days ago followed by the "good news" post we've quoted - txs surrounded by the yellow box in the screenshot below are LP adds. Bad news though all"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1992867695176684005)  2025-11-24T08:07Z 4416 followers, 17K engagements


"How to spot a insta-bond rug before it happens We just saw a classic example pop up in the last hour with an insta-bond token called $GNT (George News Token) it's a timely reminder to know what to look out for. You need to be quick but there are a few red flags to look out for if you're dabbling in the trenches: 🚩 Near-instant token approvals on PulseX. This is by far the biggest red flag - most of these guys bond the coin then within a min or two they'll immediately approve 'Unlimited' tokens for trade on PulseX. The wallet that launched $GNT is a classic example - XX seconds between"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1994148600503521513)  2025-11-27T20:57Z 4414 followers, 5158 engagements


"Yesterday's $LOG rug from @almighty5555_ ticked a number of these red flags - it was clear from the start that this would almost definitely rug. 🚩 Wallet connected to prior rugs - this would've taken a bit more analysis to work through but you had a whole XX mins pre-rug to check it out 🚩 Sent a decent chunk of the supply out of the wallet within minutes (8 mins to be exact) 🚩 Unlimited approval of the token on PulseX XX mins after deploying 🚩 Zero mention of the CA on X before rugging - it may have briefly been mentioned in some degen TG groups though"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1994149917577859365)  2025-11-27T21:02Z 4414 followers, 1118 engagements


"eUSDC and eUSDT are bridge derivative tokens directly backed 1:1 with the equivalent tokens locked in the bridge contract on Ethereum - part of the reason they hold a 'peg' is the arbitrage opportunities between chains as well as PulseX Phux and Tide stable pools assisting stability. pDAI doesn't have ANY backing - there is no 'bridge contract' equivalent. There was a slim (though extremely unlikely) chance of it working when Maker was still functioning but in the post-ESM world there's simply no point. You're not magically backing 10s of billions of dollars with thin air. Just because it WAS"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1994223785885749518)  2025-11-28T01:56Z 4385 followers, 2599 engagements


"PulseChain - how much spare capital is sitting on chain waiting to buy The answers may surprise you. Recently we asked you what you wanted to know about the chain and this was one of the burning questions. We took a full analysis of all $ETH $DAI $USDC and $USDT sitting on chain and ran the numbers. 📢 SPOILER - There's likely to be $XX million sitting liquid ready to spend on-chain right now. See below for the breakdown. First some context: 🔎 We only looked at liquid balances - excluded all capital sitting in LPs or contracts and excluded certain wallets such as those who just arb across"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1994330707682857209)  2025-11-28T09:01Z 4416 followers, 15.5K engagements


"@Rocketnick10 @HeXEtherealpUMP @RemindMe_OfThis There's parity between DAI (on Ethereum) and bridged 'DAI from Ethereum' (on Pulsechain). There's also parity between pDAI and bridged 'pDAI from Pulsechain' (on Ethereum) These are different assets. There is no secret sauce"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1994911096411685133)  2025-11-29T23:27Z 4383 followers, XXX engagements


"That 'kinda irrelevant' dev created the only ecosystem projects Richard has ever interacted with outside of his own coins (Hedron/Icosa). He also maintains and develops quite a few of the things that operate in the background and allow us to have certain functionality on PulseChain all off his own back and all without thanks"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997802291689296191)  2025-12-07T22:55Z 4412 followers, XXX engagements


"✍ Take out the bonus multipliers (essentially 1/2 the prices we posted) and you were still selling at relatively impressive prices. ✍ Add some staking ROI on top of your original HEX purchases if you end-staked before saccing You're up an even more ridiculous amount. ✍ Maybe you had a much worse entry You were still early-ish but say your average HEX entry was 3c You're STILL selling $PLS and $PLSX at a 2x above that today or break even without the multiplier. ✍ Even if you purchased HEX at absolute ATH values and sacced it all for $PLSX you actually had the opportunity to sell your bags just"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997094190938005856)  2025-12-06T00:02Z 4428 followers, 4089 engagements


"Yesterday's #PulseChain DEX volume continues to show why we simply won't quit. It's certainly nowhere near ATH DEX volume but it still ranks PulseChain as 5th on @dexscreener as it has been near-consistently for X years running. For comparison Monad the newest and greatest blockchain which everyone on X has been shilling for months before it's recent public release did less volume than PulseChain yesterday (and half the number of transactions). DexScreener doesn't even include DEX volume from Balancer forks (as they don't seem to want to integrate them) so it's missing the additional volume"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1998143253254992044)  2025-12-08T21:30Z 4430 followers, 5672 engagements


"The blockchain sometimes has interesting ways of speaking to you. Messages aren't always in written form. Transactions (or a series of transactions) can be an equally powerful message if you're willing to listen. $PLS $PLSX $HEX $INC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1998196060825718979)  2025-12-09T01:00Z 4430 followers, 10.1K engagements


"The X wallets pictured have been responsible for selling $250k of assets into stables in the last X days alone and courtesy of how liquidity pairing works it all routes through $PLS on the way. That means $250k of sell pressure on $PLS which is 10-15% of what's been deployed in this pump"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1998482787935129979)  2025-12-09T20:00Z 4430 followers, 1767 engagements


"Intrigued to see this in action. It's been nearly impossible to get funds on and off PulseChain since day X without every man and their dog seeing it happen. Adding a privacy layer into the mix as long as it's executed well serves to benefit all users"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997763430053503250)  2025-12-07T20:21Z 4430 followers, 8498 engagements


"Of note this isn't the lowest TVL the bridge has ever seen - that happened on 7th Jan 2024 ($65m). We've seen a TVL around this level X times now and each time it's rebounded. One of those rebounds led to an ATH TVL of $180m in March 2024"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997797810218127754)  2025-12-07T22:38Z 4430 followers, 1177 engagements


"The eagle-eyed among you may notice that $PLSX has received a bit of buy pressure in the days since the flat-rate phase finished for the ProveX sacrifice. Why $PLSX Due to the vast majority of PLSX liquidity (90%) being with $PLS it means that buys from ETH and stables get almost entirely routed through PLS on the way to PLSX - boosting the price of both tokens (PLSX obviously more so). PLSX vs USD and PLSX vs PLS charts below. Perhaps these buys are delivering a message Perhaps it's time for the community to stop jeeting every single XX% relief pump and properly set a floor at these levels"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997818920141763023)  2025-12-08T00:02Z 4430 followers, 27.1K engagements


"Rotatooooors out in full-swing. $HEX down nearly XX% in the last few hours vs $PLSX"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997827591429034398)  2025-12-08T00:36Z 4430 followers, 11.4K engagements


"@veg_man08 The use of TornadoCash means we'll never know. Perhaps it's someone interested in the long-term success of the ecosystem"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997948795364241482)  2025-12-08T08:38Z 4429 followers, 1002 engagements


"#nodaysoff Using this pump as ongoing exit liquidity when the 'pool' has already sold and bridged out in excess of $20m is insane. Chronic sellers at these levels appear to have no long-term mindset. If you still had $10+ million of assets still on-chain would you perhaps be interested in letting prices get a little higher than XX% off the absolute all-time-lows"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1998478199219695941)  2025-12-09T19:41Z 4430 followers, 8107 engagements


"@JWESTRADA04 Not this time"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1998553912304169354)  2025-12-10T00:42Z 4430 followers, XXX engagements


"Same guy that tanked his $PLS and $PLSX bags today sacced all of it to ProveX via what either looks like a small private pool or one man's eclectic wallet collection. First $25k snuck in on the yesterday's cutoff at the exact second it was due to close absolute edge-of-your-seat stuff. Otherwise the rest of it was at today's rate which is.bad. Make it make sense"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1998677333071278247)  2025-12-10T08:53Z 4430 followers, 4111 engagements


"For those who weren't already aware @almighty5555_ has a sketchy history in this ecosystem exemplified by yet another rug-pull in the last few hours. Wallet 0xeb072caa33758038cedf4393d06861b20fbffea8 insta-bonded a token called $LOG (Logarithmic) just under X hours ago before almost immediately dumping it into the ground for a measly $4k profit. Bonding tx for reference: This fea8 wallet is very clearly connected to 0x2d72827b55805eb1b8990b52b9cef9f9b84d5e94 which is the wallet that handled the bulk of the $ALMIGHTY token moves before eventually dumping that one into the ground a few weeks"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1993840730557829159)  2025-11-27T00:34Z 4416 followers, 10.4K engagements


"$PLS sitting right in all-time-low wick territory. Bridge outflows aren't even that high so it's reasonably likely that many people are sidelined and looking for better entries. Big question though how far will the knife fall first"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1995656945303519719)  2025-12-02T00:51Z 4422 followers, 3571 engagements


"🌉 PulseChain bridge update: Nov 2025 🌉 Look away now if you're squeamish this one gets bloody. 🪙 EOM TVL = $72.96m The bridge TVL ended the month $14.65m down from opening a remarkably similar decline to October. This decline was noticeably sharp and consistent from the beginning of the @ProveXCom sac phase. The vast majority of this value drop as per other months was actually the decreased price of $eHEX in the bridge contract representing $6.46m of the TVL change (nearly 50%) - as discussed in other monthly updates this is why total TVL can be an awkward metric to use. The 'real' TVL"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1995759797875155208)  2025-12-02T07:39Z 4425 followers, 4335 engagements


"⚠ Scam warning: someone is larping as @provexpool and has purchased provexpools.eth as an ENS. Be very careful and triple check where you're sending sac funds"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1995930593339867478)  2025-12-02T18:58Z 4426 followers, 2771 engagements


"PulseChain seeing the slightest hint of a green candle today"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1995985379741368572)  2025-12-02T22:36Z 4422 followers, 2599 engagements


"Hello #buypressure we missed you"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1996061379250569388)  2025-12-03T03:38Z 4420 followers, 11.2K engagements


"You know that lettuce that's been in the fridge drawer for a month and you forgot about it That's the quality of lettuce hands right now. $PLS $PLSX $HEX $INC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1996307856354931004)  2025-12-03T19:57Z 4423 followers, 3247 engagements


"People are really letting loose on the cores. A connected wallet (0x5162cad6d502bcbc1c67fae95092da0b6c144956) has already sacced $144k $DAI to @ProveXCom and has just sent the proceeds of this dump to that wallet - perhaps planning to top up their sac They're also sitting on 20b $PLS is this going to hit the charts next $PLS $HEX $PLSX and $INC are all on clearance sale right now people are dumping into low liquidity and eating lots of slippage. Rip that band-aid off"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1996692977893495203)  2025-12-04T21:27Z 4416 followers, 8293 engagements


"There's been lots of chatter about the probable "low marketcap" of $ProveX recently but is that really a relevant metric The crypto world is still really stuck on the concept of marketcap being a relevant figure but what actually matters ✅ Price ✅ Liquidity Last cycle Hexicans spent an ungodly amount of energy trying to spread the "marketcap doesn't matter" message but it seems like everyone has since forgotten and is back focusing entirely on this number. "I'm not gonna buy this meme it's already hit 20m MC" "Bro this coin is such a good entry at 50k MC" Neither of these statements make"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1996708496893792601)  2025-12-04T22:29Z 4430 followers, 13.2K engagements


"Still salty about not being able to sacrifice core @RichardHeartWin tokens for @ProveXCom We're here to show you the math behind why this decision was made using the $PLS and $PLSX sacrifices as examples. We'll use some numbers that could've been applicable to a number of early Hexicans. To make the math easy here's some assumptions: 🪙 You purchased 20m $HEX at an average price of $XXXXX in the early days (which is roughly the current price of $HEX on PulseChain and a perfectly reasonable average entry for most early adopters) 🪙 You never staked any (obviously unlikely but we'll discuss"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997094183069491487)  2025-12-06T00:02Z 4430 followers, 41.1K engagements


"Also bonus bonus nugget this in effect means $HEX is massively under-valued vs $PLS and $PLSX as long as your reference point is sac prices"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997094493896736913)  2025-12-06T00:03Z 4430 followers, 3798 engagements


"Some bonus $HEX stats to start off your weekend as requested by @TamTamHEX Sacrifice details: 🪙 PulseChain $PLS sacrifice - XXXXX billion sacced to PulseChain - XXXXX billion was from OA wallets - XXX billion was from users 🪙 PulseX $PLSX sacrifice - XXXXX billion sacced to PulseX - BUT XXXXX billion of that was recycled from the PulseChain sac so if you exclude that it was XXXXX billion - XXXXX billion of that was from OA wallets - XXX billion from users (remember price was higher than during PLS sac so a lower amount makes sense) 🪙 Total combined sac numbers - XXXXX billion - XXX billion"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997238172795990426)  2025-12-06T09:34Z 4430 followers, 18.9K engagements


"Now that the flat-rate phase of the ProveX sac has finished we've seen bridge TVL flatten off (actually a small rise) after a heavy decline - note that the bridge TVL is disproportionally impacted by the prices of $eHEX and $ETH in particular so it's challenging to interpret (for example there's $10m $eHEX on the bridge right now if it goes down XX% in value the bridge TVL would drop by $3m - equally if it went up XX% the bridge TVL would go up by $5m). Circled below is when the flat-rate phase ended. Since that phase ended on the bridge we've seen: ✅ $ETH value up $1.25m (a small outflow in"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997796048891453532)  2025-12-07T22:31Z 4430 followers, 9280 engagements


"@TehOracle369 No. How did that work out again"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1998203371682218414)  2025-12-09T01:29Z 4424 followers, XXX engagements


"The new $PLSX and $PLS floors hold for now"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1998211850014786034)  2025-12-09T02:03Z 4430 followers, 8941 engagements


"Wallet 0x62b39f8ae4a7bf58d487dc7d70a2bbcd13131766 woke up and chose violence. Two connected wallets sent their supply of $PLSX and $PLS here after effectively X years of inactivity. They clipped out around $260k of $PLS in a XX min window - $160k of which was from selling $PLSX. Right before daily close. Bridging out via LibertySwap as we speak"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1998545198373343446)  2025-12-10T00:08Z 4430 followers, 12.7K engagements


"When dad comes back from the store and finds out you've been selling down his pumps he's gonna be real mad. $PLSX"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1997897567989027030)  2025-12-08T05:14Z 4430 followers, 5990 engagements


"Pictured: this dude trying to work out if dumping his entire bags near the lows to sac at increasingly terrible rates makes sense"  
[X Link](https://x.com/cryptosolv/status/1998677708679839917)  2025-12-10T08:54Z 4430 followers, XXX engagements