[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @awmacp Andrew Mac Andrew Mac posts on X about staking the most. They currently have XXX followers and X posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1465406672952872961/interactions)  - X Months XXX -XX% - X Year XXXXX +524% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1465406672952872961/posts_active)  ### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1465406672952872961/followers)  - X Months XXX +28% - X Year XXX -XXXX% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1465406672952872961/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1465406672952872961/influence) --- **Social category influence** [finance](/list/finance) **Social topic influence** [staking](/topic/staking) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1465406672952872961/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "To make the comparison I cooked up a simple risk model for a node operator in the two rgimes. The model shows that the feasible staking strategies depend much more on the risk tolerance of the operator in Swarm today than in the withdrawable model. This shouldn't be surprising: if stake is withdrawable you can generally expect to recover your principal whereas if it's not the risk calculation becomes much more critical. I argue that this makes withdrawable stake more egalitarian and hence less prone to centralisation. Read more here:"  [@awmacp](/creator/x/awmacp) on [X](/post/tweet/1945759207741145568) 2025-07-17 08:15:20 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements "Published a new blog post discussing strategy and risk in the context of staking in the @ethswarm Network 👨🏫 Today Swarm storage providers stake BZZ tokens to participate in revenue sharing but uniquely the stake is not generally withdrawable (except under certain market conditions). How vulnerable is this system to market concentration and centralisation compared to a more familiar setup where stake can be withdrawn"  [@awmacp](/creator/x/awmacp) on [X](/post/tweet/1945759044314267713) 2025-07-17 08:14:41 UTC XXX followers, 1358 engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@awmacp Andrew Mac
Andrew Mac posts on X about staking the most. They currently have XXX followers and X posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Months XXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXX +524%
Mentions: X #
Followers: XXX #
- X Months XXX +28%
- X Year XXX -XXXX%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence #
Social category influence finance
Social topic influence staking
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"To make the comparison I cooked up a simple risk model for a node operator in the two rgimes. The model shows that the feasible staking strategies depend much more on the risk tolerance of the operator in Swarm today than in the withdrawable model. This shouldn't be surprising: if stake is withdrawable you can generally expect to recover your principal whereas if it's not the risk calculation becomes much more critical. I argue that this makes withdrawable stake more egalitarian and hence less prone to centralisation. Read more here:"
@awmacp on X 2025-07-17 08:15:20 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements
"Published a new blog post discussing strategy and risk in the context of staking in the @ethswarm Network 👨🏫 Today Swarm storage providers stake BZZ tokens to participate in revenue sharing but uniquely the stake is not generally withdrawable (except under certain market conditions). How vulnerable is this system to market concentration and centralisation compared to a more familiar setup where stake can be withdrawn" @awmacp on X 2025-07-17 08:14:41 UTC XXX followers, 1358 engagements