[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @Exogynous NeilT NeilT posts on X about $8bn, linde plc, over the, hamas the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1527687428609286151/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX -XXXX% - X Month XXXXXX -XX% - X Months XXXXXXX +3.60% - X Year XXXXXXXXX -XX% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1527687428609286151/posts_active)  - X Week XX +50% - X Month XX -XX% - X Months XXX -XX% - X Year XXXXX +2.60% ### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1527687428609286151/followers)  - X Week XXXXX +0.79% - X Month XXXXX -XXXX% - X Months XXXXX +35% - X Year XXXXX +75% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1527687428609286151/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1527687428609286151/influence) --- **Social category influence** [stocks](/list/stocks) XXXX% [finance](/list/finance) XXXX% [automotive brands](/list/automotive-brands) XXXX% **Social topic influence** [$8bn](/topic/$8bn) 0.59%, [linde plc](/topic/linde-plc) 0.29%, [over the](/topic/over-the) 0.29%, [hamas](/topic/hamas) 0.29%, [insurance](/topic/insurance) 0.29%, [$tm](/topic/$tm) 0.29%, [dont get](/topic/dont-get) 0.29%, [$ba](/topic/$ba) 0.29%, [state of](/topic/state-of) 0.29%, [launches](/topic/launches) XXXX% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@grok](/creator/undefined) [@xdnibor](/creator/undefined) [@elonmusk](/creator/undefined) [@deltaiv9250](/creator/undefined) [@sciguyspace](/creator/undefined) [@peterrhague](/creator/undefined) [@dahm_mike](/creator/undefined) [@foodman1676878](/creator/undefined) [@jfkwhitlam](/creator/undefined) [@dahmmike](/creator/undefined) [@starlink](/creator/undefined) [@sawyermerritt](/creator/undefined) [@eoreo](/creator/undefined) [@nxt4eu](/creator/undefined) [@drburkstrom](/creator/undefined) [@passionfingerz](/creator/undefined) [@cturnbull1968](/creator/undefined) [@adamandevs](/creator/undefined) [@saxushu](/creator/undefined) [@kmh](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [Linde PLC (LIN)](/topic/linde-plc) [Toyota Motor Corporation (TM)](/topic/$tm) [Boeing Co (BA)](/topic/$ba) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1527687428609286151/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "@Leffmog @SawyerMerritt Indeed they also own British Oxygen and Praxair in the US which has dropped its name for Linde PLC" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1978049257618751980) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-14T10:44Z 1022 followers, XXX engagements "@SciGuySpace Reflex into the vision of re-use would be more like it. If it wasn't for Dragon and Starship and the crippling cost of SLS as a component of Artemis they would not be thinking of this kind of reuse. Which means they are invested in the cloak of reuse not the reality of reuse" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1978566233055199711) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-15T20:58Z 1022 followers, 2046 engagements "@SciGuySpace So they are essentially arguing that Starliner would not have been either late or a total clusterfuck if it had been allowed to be cost+ with an $8bn price tag and that SpaceX with Crew Dragon was the "problem" all along This is the logic they are using" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1978914041629413666) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-16T20:00Z 1022 followers, 2386 engagements "@xdNiBoR This is not blanket over the US. Cali yes in the North yes but in the South They take a rather dim view of excessive speeding. I was fortunate enough to be advised before FO. I modified my speed even though it was at 3am" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1978935009172947155) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-16T21:24Z 1022 followers, 1607 engagements "It took them X years and X days for them to refurbish the ML and have it ready for stacking SLS for Artemis X. If they launch in Feb 2026 it will have taken a further X year and X months to stack and test the full stack for Artemis X. X years and X months. If it takes the same again for Artemis X then it would be May 2029 before Artemis X could launch. In SpaceX terms forever and a day. Of course they could reduce the time to do the refurb and build by X year and XX months almost 2/3 and be ready to launch in April 2027. Couldn't they I mean they have shown absolute capability to exceed" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1979237616156307542) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-17T17:26Z 1022 followers, 1077 engagements "@peterrhague Fairly confident that his 1a rights allow him to sue his company into the ground if they try to censure him for this. Not that a lot of them would bother. They are all heavily invested in the HAMAS victim culture" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1976904880586715358) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-11T06:57Z 1018 followers, XXX engagements "This is true. But it is only going to get even more exciting for the next few decades. What comes after Well that depends on the vision of the leaders. In the nearer term SpaceX will be able to fund Starship out of profits in 2026. This will only grow in 2027 and forward. SpaceX will have to grow to the size of a moderately large country in revenue and profits and in some ways in staff in order to meet their goals. Literally a new country is going to be born and we're all going to be calling it a company" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1978544483550543941) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-15T19:32Z 1019 followers, 1193 engagements "You have to understand how theft is now being dealt with by the police. No witnesses they won't even take a statement. You call the police they give you a number you call them in the morning (only open 9-5) and they give you an incident number for your insurance. Their involvement finished. Only if a person is attacked and injured and winds up in hospital will interest start to spark and then they will still give you a number for your insurance. Literally they won't care until it becomes more painful for them to ignore it than it does to do something about it. When working in London I stopped" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1978576757512110150) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-15T21:40Z 1019 followers, 1892 engagements "@greggertruck Don't get me started on Toyota. Their so called "Hydrogen super engine" is nothing more than a huge pump. There is zero new in the technology and you are way better off with a fuel cell. Just the replacement of the hydrogen tank every decade is a total no go" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1978579207316803685) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-15T21:50Z 1018 followers, XXX engagements "@xdNiBoR Yes because if Boeing had been allowed to take Starliner on Cost+ it would have cost $8bn come in two years earlier with state of the art navigation solutions decent wiring and a whole load of new thrusters completely specified for the job and not just off the shelf. Right" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1978914741780135973) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-16T20:03Z 1018 followers, XX engagements "Grok if Artemis X launches in February 2026 as planned what is the fastest likely turnaround for the Mobile launcher damage assessment launcher repair full Artemis build and ready for launch Having assessed that date can we then assess the likelihood that SpaceX will not have completed all tests ready for HLS to pre position for Artemis X launch" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1979233701562048595) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-17T17:11Z 1021 followers, XX engagements "@grok @WG_Mojo @deltaIV9250 And can you assess the likelihood that NASA will be able to reduce the X years and X months to turn around the full stack for Artemis X (assuming a February launch) to X year and X months in order to make early 2027:" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1979236689634562309) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-17T17:22Z 1020 followers, XX engagements "@grok @WG_Mojo @deltaIV9250 Is your assumption that the Orion heatshield is still an unknown and that the result of the change in return angle may still result in unacceptable ablation and burn through requiring further fixes which will take more time" [X Link](https://x.com/Exogynous/status/1979251145596944603) [@Exogynous](/creator/x/Exogynous) 2025-10-17T18:20Z 1021 followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@Exogynous NeilT
NeilT posts on X about $8bn, linde plc, over the, hamas the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Week XXXXXX -XXXX%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXXX +3.60%
- X Year XXXXXXXXX -XX%
Mentions: X #
- X Week XX +50%
- X Month XX -XX%
- X Months XXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXX +2.60%
Followers: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXX +0.79%
- X Month XXXXX -XXXX%
- X Months XXXXX +35%
- X Year XXXXX +75%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence #
Social category influence stocks XXXX% finance XXXX% automotive brands XXXX%
Social topic influence $8bn 0.59%, linde plc 0.29%, over the 0.29%, hamas 0.29%, insurance 0.29%, $tm 0.29%, dont get 0.29%, $ba 0.29%, state of 0.29%, launches XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @grok @xdnibor @elonmusk @deltaiv9250 @sciguyspace @peterrhague @dahm_mike @foodman1676878 @jfkwhitlam @dahmmike @starlink @sawyermerritt @eoreo @nxt4eu @drburkstrom @passionfingerz @cturnbull1968 @adamandevs @saxushu @kmh
Top assets mentioned Linde PLC (LIN) Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) Boeing Co (BA)
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@Leffmog @SawyerMerritt Indeed they also own British Oxygen and Praxair in the US which has dropped its name for Linde PLC"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-14T10:44Z 1022 followers, XXX engagements
"@SciGuySpace Reflex into the vision of re-use would be more like it. If it wasn't for Dragon and Starship and the crippling cost of SLS as a component of Artemis they would not be thinking of this kind of reuse. Which means they are invested in the cloak of reuse not the reality of reuse"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-15T20:58Z 1022 followers, 2046 engagements
"@SciGuySpace So they are essentially arguing that Starliner would not have been either late or a total clusterfuck if it had been allowed to be cost+ with an $8bn price tag and that SpaceX with Crew Dragon was the "problem" all along This is the logic they are using"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-16T20:00Z 1022 followers, 2386 engagements
"@xdNiBoR This is not blanket over the US. Cali yes in the North yes but in the South They take a rather dim view of excessive speeding. I was fortunate enough to be advised before FO. I modified my speed even though it was at 3am"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-16T21:24Z 1022 followers, 1607 engagements
"It took them X years and X days for them to refurbish the ML and have it ready for stacking SLS for Artemis X. If they launch in Feb 2026 it will have taken a further X year and X months to stack and test the full stack for Artemis X. X years and X months. If it takes the same again for Artemis X then it would be May 2029 before Artemis X could launch. In SpaceX terms forever and a day. Of course they could reduce the time to do the refurb and build by X year and XX months almost 2/3 and be ready to launch in April 2027. Couldn't they I mean they have shown absolute capability to exceed"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-17T17:26Z 1022 followers, 1077 engagements
"@peterrhague Fairly confident that his 1a rights allow him to sue his company into the ground if they try to censure him for this. Not that a lot of them would bother. They are all heavily invested in the HAMAS victim culture"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-11T06:57Z 1018 followers, XXX engagements
"This is true. But it is only going to get even more exciting for the next few decades. What comes after Well that depends on the vision of the leaders. In the nearer term SpaceX will be able to fund Starship out of profits in 2026. This will only grow in 2027 and forward. SpaceX will have to grow to the size of a moderately large country in revenue and profits and in some ways in staff in order to meet their goals. Literally a new country is going to be born and we're all going to be calling it a company"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-15T19:32Z 1019 followers, 1193 engagements
"You have to understand how theft is now being dealt with by the police. No witnesses they won't even take a statement. You call the police they give you a number you call them in the morning (only open 9-5) and they give you an incident number for your insurance. Their involvement finished. Only if a person is attacked and injured and winds up in hospital will interest start to spark and then they will still give you a number for your insurance. Literally they won't care until it becomes more painful for them to ignore it than it does to do something about it. When working in London I stopped"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-15T21:40Z 1019 followers, 1892 engagements
"@greggertruck Don't get me started on Toyota. Their so called "Hydrogen super engine" is nothing more than a huge pump. There is zero new in the technology and you are way better off with a fuel cell. Just the replacement of the hydrogen tank every decade is a total no go"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-15T21:50Z 1018 followers, XXX engagements
"@xdNiBoR Yes because if Boeing had been allowed to take Starliner on Cost+ it would have cost $8bn come in two years earlier with state of the art navigation solutions decent wiring and a whole load of new thrusters completely specified for the job and not just off the shelf. Right"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-16T20:03Z 1018 followers, XX engagements
"Grok if Artemis X launches in February 2026 as planned what is the fastest likely turnaround for the Mobile launcher damage assessment launcher repair full Artemis build and ready for launch Having assessed that date can we then assess the likelihood that SpaceX will not have completed all tests ready for HLS to pre position for Artemis X launch"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-17T17:11Z 1021 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @WG_Mojo @deltaIV9250 And can you assess the likelihood that NASA will be able to reduce the X years and X months to turn around the full stack for Artemis X (assuming a February launch) to X year and X months in order to make early 2027:"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-17T17:22Z 1020 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @WG_Mojo @deltaIV9250 Is your assumption that the Orion heatshield is still an unknown and that the result of the change in return angle may still result in unacceptable ablation and burn through requiring further fixes which will take more time"
X Link @Exogynous 2025-10-17T18:20Z 1021 followers, XX engagements