[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @Ejcacciatore ejcacciatore 〽️ ejcacciatore 〽️ posts on X about catalyst, $3817b, $1226t the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1436891113/interactions)  - X Months XXXXX +197% - X Year XXXXXX +586% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1436891113/posts_active)  - X Months XX +25% - X Year XX +138% ### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1436891113/followers)  - X Months XXX +14% - X Year XXX -XX% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1436891113/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1436891113/influence) --- **Social category influence** [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) **Social topic influence** [catalyst](/topic/catalyst), [$3817b](/topic/$3817b), [$1226t](/topic/$1226t) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1436891113/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Your comparison of Nov 2025 to Nov 2024 ignores the irreplaceable catalyst: Trumps election victory sparked a XX% BTC surge on pro-crypto policy hype which has since normalized without fresh political fuel. No equivalent event exists now markets have priced in 2025s gradual regs like the GENIUS Act. XX Positive data is overstated or misleading. Crypto lacks stock-like intrinsic value; its XXX% sentiment/speculation-driven amplified by hacks/volatility and not manipulation. Hard facts: BTC crashed XXXX% from $123k peak to $105k-$110k today; ETH down 7-25% to $3.6k" [X Link](https://x.com/Ejcacciatore/status/1985515573644567016) [@Ejcacciatore](/creator/x/Ejcacciatore) 2025-11-04T01:12Z XXX followers, 5301 engagements "@adamblivInteresting animation visually looks cool but this comparison misses the mark on why Buffett stacks T-bills. Berkshire's $381.7B cash (31% of $1.226T total assets) isn't for growth (it's risk aversion in frothy markets) earning X% yields (positive real returns not X% losses). +1BTC's XX% CAGR Sure if you ignore XX% crashes and volatility that makes it anything but. Plus liquidity: Buffett couldn't buy $183B in BTC without nuking the price upward (then crashing on sell). MicroStrategy's levered bet works for them but Berkshire's dry powder is for fat pitches not moonshots. Apples to" [X Link](https://x.com/Ejcacciatore/status/1985788094730121238) [@Ejcacciatore](/creator/x/Ejcacciatore) 2025-11-04T19:15Z XXX followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@Ejcacciatore ejcacciatore 〽️ejcacciatore 〽️ posts on X about catalyst, $3817b, $1226t the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence cryptocurrencies
Social topic influence catalyst, $3817b, $1226t
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Your comparison of Nov 2025 to Nov 2024 ignores the irreplaceable catalyst: Trumps election victory sparked a XX% BTC surge on pro-crypto policy hype which has since normalized without fresh political fuel. No equivalent event exists now markets have priced in 2025s gradual regs like the GENIUS Act. XX Positive data is overstated or misleading. Crypto lacks stock-like intrinsic value; its XXX% sentiment/speculation-driven amplified by hacks/volatility and not manipulation. Hard facts: BTC crashed XXXX% from $123k peak to $105k-$110k today; ETH down 7-25% to $3.6k"
X Link @Ejcacciatore 2025-11-04T01:12Z XXX followers, 5301 engagements
"@adamblivInteresting animation visually looks cool but this comparison misses the mark on why Buffett stacks T-bills. Berkshire's $381.7B cash (31% of $1.226T total assets) isn't for growth (it's risk aversion in frothy markets) earning X% yields (positive real returns not X% losses). +1BTC's XX% CAGR Sure if you ignore XX% crashes and volatility that makes it anything but. Plus liquidity: Buffett couldn't buy $183B in BTC without nuking the price upward (then crashing on sell). MicroStrategy's levered bet works for them but Berkshire's dry powder is for fat pitches not moonshots. Apples to"
X Link @Ejcacciatore 2025-11-04T19:15Z XXX followers, XX engagements
/creator/x::Ejcacciatore