[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

[@solver_cs](/creator/twitter/solver_cs)
"#UPbit made some moves last night on #MultiversX"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983144210858410245) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T12:09Z 1621 followers, 3915 engagements


"The most influential entity in the latest #MultiversX governance vote controls around XXX addresses holding a combined stake of approximately XXX million #EGLD. Unsurprisingly every one of these addresses voted YES. How do we know they belong to the same entity Over the past XX days all of them transferred a total of 23k EGLD to the same Binance deposit address. This represents about XXXX% of the total staking power and roughly XXXX% of all votes cast so far. Here is the Binance address that received those #EGLD transfers:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983128662565105712) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T11:08Z 1621 followers, 18.6K engagements


"Again some activity from #UPbit last night it seems they buy arbitrage it but they also keep some #EGLD according to their balance"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983864266282144126) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-30T11:51Z 1621 followers, 2280 engagements


"🗳 Status Update on the MultiversX Economic Evolution Vote 🚩 Important Note: This snapshot includes both normal staking and liquid staking votes. Due to the complexity of the data there may be some errors or omissions. Voting is still in progress and numbers may change. So far 2771 wallets have participated. The 🏦64 largest wallets (14000 EGLD staked) control XXXX% of the total voting power almost equal to the combined 👯2707 smaller wallets (14000 EGLD) holding 49.2%. Despite this heavy concentration the vote currently shows strong alignment across both groups: ✅ Yes: XXXX% (4.24M EGLD) ❌"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1982120725457584297) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-25T16:23Z 1621 followers, 16.1K engagements


"Hope didn't help. #EGLD 😰"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983932402532536421) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-30T16:21Z 1621 followers, 5177 engagements


"Guys you might not agree with everything in this economics upgrade on #MultiversX but have you seen this kind of marathon discussion happening on any other chain Theres something genuinely positive here and I really love to see it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1975975035618869516) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-08T17:22Z 1621 followers, 9864 engagements


"If the #MultiversX Foundation holds the majority stake in #xMoney would you agree that it should sell xMoney and other owned assets and use the funds for $EGLD buybacks and continued chain development instead of increasing the supply any further"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1977451942319476849) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-12T19:10Z 1621 followers, 4001 engagements


"Interesting to see that the #MultiversX Foundation has recently started moving tokens from Binance to distribute to users who buy $EGLD through xPortal. Its a positive sign at least it puts some buying pressure on the price. Were not talking about huge amounts or whales here but its still notable: roughly 40k $EGLD withdrawn from Binance in the last XX days and distributed across about 2200 wallets. The remaining half likely comes from Foundation-controlled wallets"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1980332972336124175) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-20T17:59Z 1621 followers, 4742 engagements


"Even if I dont fully agree with their plan its still better than doing nothing. $EGLD had a major advantage being scarce carrying the name e-Gold that had strong marketing potential. If the funds had been spent more wisely focusing on blockchain fundamentals and attracting new builders instead of acquiring other companies and hiring hundreds of people who were later fired things could have been very different. There have been many poor management decisions along the way. But here we are now and if nothing changes as they like to say - oan handrd prsent the next bear market could mark the end"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1980568004665528781) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-21T09:33Z 1621 followers, XXX engagements


"Looking at the #Kadena chart its striking how similar it looks to $EGLD chart right up to the point where Kadena announced they were shutting down operations due to lack of funds. Maybe #MultiversX still has a chance but the similarities between the two charts only confirm what Ive been saying for a long time: the price is telling a story. If you listen carefully you dont need to know much about the fundamentals. For Kadena it ended badly though theres still a chance this time with the community taking control. We are ready to engage with the Kadena community to discuss how we can aid the"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1980889297164161060) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-22T06:49Z 1621 followers, 5438 engagements


"6. #MultiversX might gain some advantages fundamentally with the upcoming #Supernova upgrade (hopefully) but its worth nothing if we don't have some adoption. #Sonic ($S) had already implemented a native stablecoin before its supply increase a feature that we all complained is the problem for the lack of liquidity on MvX. The outcome will depend not only on market conditions but also on whether this ongoing upgrade will generate real demand"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983488845845819698) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-29T10:59Z 1621 followers, XXX engagements


"Some more room to go down to $105-$106k is it done or lower #BTC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983928600706367654) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-30T16:06Z 1621 followers, XXX engagements


"@SirSatosh 😅 lines on the chart doesn't help the price it would be nice to be that easy"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983944612399227101) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-30T17:10Z 1621 followers, XXX engagements


"I appreciate Alex Tabarrok but that take feels a bit like childish thinking. Its basically saying MVX has no value at all like theres no difference between $X and $XX per coin. Oh sure being XX% down is totally fine right 😅 Now imagine having $100k in $EGLD at $10/coin would you really say what are we afraid to lose Try that one with your portfolio open or while pitching to investors. 😂"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1980562487230533640) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-21T09:11Z 1621 followers, XXX engagements


"#Uber and #Revolut used VC money to subsidize early growth - they basically paid for customer acquisition at first using the VCs money. That was the bet. #MultiversX wants to do something similar but with a twist: using token inflation instead of investor capital. They just hope that after inflation capital will come. Same logic different cost and different risk. - VCs got diluted there. - Token holders get diluted here. In the real economy this is called growth subsidies. What #MultiversX is doing is growth subsidies on steroids. Is it good Only time will tell"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1980573219271676216) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-21T09:53Z 1622 followers, 3220 engagements


"The moment has arrived vote according to your convictions. Im still waiting for the promised transparency report; without it I wont be casting my vote"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1981060436079628668) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-22T18:09Z 1620 followers, 3899 engagements


"🗳Status on the MultiversX Economic Evolution Vote 🚩Important Note: this is based only on votes coming from normal staking excluding the liquid staking voters. Also it doesn't contain all the data vote is still in process anything can change. Out of 1136 wallets that participated until the moment of the analysis the XX largest wallets (20000 EGLD staked) controlled XXXX% of the total voting power almost equal to the remaining 1106 wallets combined. Despite this concentration both large and small holders voted overwhelmingly in favor of the proposal: ✅ Yes: XXXX% (2.73 M EGLD) ❌ No: XXX% (158"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1981341817594315238) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-23T12:47Z 1622 followers, 5622 engagements


"Lets be real here. I like #MultiversX for its user experience and its not because Im used to it. Ive looked a little bit into other chains too. But this doesnt change the fundamentals: 👉 The competition is way bigger than it was last cycle. 👉 Theres no huge performance gap anymore. From the list below several chains already have stronger adoption US presence and are backed by major investors. So the real question is: 🔴What makes #MultiversX a real competitor in this environment Lets be sincere every L1 is fighting for the same things: ⚙ The same developers 👥 The same users 💸 The same"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1982766835708682297) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-27T11:10Z 1622 followers, 4221 engagements


"Before you can build credibility in the US you first need to restore or strengthen it here. You cant simply abandon the existing community (which they didn't they have return to it because they need it). The vote for the economic upgrade will pass as I predicted even before it began but people arent voting out of conviction; most are doing it out of resignation: We have to try what could be worse than the current situation"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1982803422911893602) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-27T13:35Z 1622 followers, XXX engagements


"Let me just say this: on the address below you can see that one entity/person is controlling XXX addresses holding a stake of around XXX mil EGLD. He/she/it voted YES with all the wallets. Not to go further and say that XXX wallet controlled by X entities/persons hold a stake of almost XXX mil EGLD All of them voted YES. Yes everyone was aligned this time but let's say someone else would have a proposal that is not aligned with the X entities. PS. Here are not included the team wallets or other validators that are aligned with the team"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1982935648106406011) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-27T22:21Z 1621 followers, XXX engagements


"This time everyone was aligned but the real issue appears when a small group say XXX people can swing the vote in their favor against the majority. Im not referring specifically to this proposal but in general: if a proposal doesnt serve the interests of a few large holders it simply wont pass. Is that how it should be Should a blockchain operate like a public company where voting power reflects ownership or more like a city or nation where people build together and use the token to exchange value and services In my view the governance model is far from ideal and the real root of the problem"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983081566256459792) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T08:01Z 1620 followers, XXX engagements


"What I propose for future governance voting mechanisms: voting should be allowed only for those who have an active stake but every vote should carry equal weight. The main challenge is ensuring that each vote belongs to a unique individual. This could be addressed through identity verification systems such as Proof of Humanity BrightID or Worldcoin or any other decentralized identity protocol that aligns with blockchain principles. From a technical standpoint this is entirely feasible. Under such a system even someone who controls XXX addresses holding a total of XXX million EGLD would still"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983102657733550235) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T09:24Z 1621 followers, XXX engagements


"I understand but there are solutions and we should strive for the best ones. The ultimate question is a philosophical one about the fundamental principles: how should we see a blockchain Is it meant to be pure democracy or a system where power concentrates over the many Ultimately the Foundation should aim to pursue the best and fairest solution possible. It is a matter of will and not of possibility"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983107396265271499) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T09:43Z 1619 followers, XXX engagements


"@SasuRobert @StefanProcopiu @lucianmincu @MultiversX And about that "whale" we know and you know who that is. 😏"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983107850957431098) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T09:45Z 1619 followers, XXX engagements


"@ElrondWarrior @StefanProcopiu @lucianmincu @SasuRobert @MultiversX You can't have a real discussion with a guy who has that attitude. That's why I appreciate the most @SasuRobert because he can have civilised discussions without making personal attacks if we disagree. You need some maturity for that. So again Robert you have my respect"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983109415210565754) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T09:51Z 1619 followers, XX engagements


"@SasuRobert @StefanProcopiu @lucianmincu @MultiversX Agree. It's the best approach when the tokens were earned/bought with real money and not allocated"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983114862919332270) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T10:13Z 1619 followers, XXX engagements


"Don't click anything on xExchange official X account it was hacked. The attackers also created many fake accounts just to spread the "news""  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983116685008642112) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T10:20Z 1621 followers, 1723 engagements


"@d_bartesch @MultiversX I don't think it's the Foundation at least it shouldn't be"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983149999363108884) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T12:32Z 1619 followers, XXX engagements


"@mihaieremia_ As number of wallets but not as voting power"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983166299481223543) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T13:37Z 1619 followers, XXX engagements


"@RoundtableSpace @EgldHeist showed it on purpose and nobody could drain his wallet. I let you discover how that is possible on #MultiversX"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983199497598709992) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T15:49Z 1621 followers, 10.3K engagements


"This is really something great"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983235618663501966) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T18:13Z 1621 followers, 3281 engagements


"5. For sure things take time to develop but what we can see is that #Sonic did not improve in price at all after the increase in supply on the contrary it went even worse. Yes we can blame the markets but comparing the price action even with #EGLD price action it doesn't look too good"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983488843916402786) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-29T10:59Z 1622 followers, XXX engagements


"So. let's see what's here"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1981089817955094724) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-22T20:06Z 1621 followers, 2549 engagements


"It would have been better to be more transparent than this - $EGLD and other assets"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1981095234105987572) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-22T20:28Z 1621 followers, 1455 engagements


"Let's discuss the #SONIC ($S) economics upgrade which is astonishing similar with the upgrade for which the community is voting on #MultiversX. There is no XXX% similarities but it's worth looking into it. 👇"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983488830717280747) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-29T10:59Z 1621 followers, 1472 engagements


"Look below #Bitcoin #patternsrepeat"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1984031334512419067) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-30T22:55Z 1621 followers, XXX engagements