[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@solver_cs Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1429519726347235328.png) @solver_cs Solver

Solver posts on X about $egld, egld, blockchain, staking the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1429519726347235328/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1429519726347235328/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXXX +207%
- X Month XXXXXXX +66%
- X Months XXXXXXXXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXXXXXX +178%

### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1429519726347235328/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1429519726347235328/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week XX +38%
- X Month XXX +15%
- X Months XXX -XXXX%
- X Year XXXXX +89%

### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1429519726347235328/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1429519726347235328/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXXXX +0.31%
- X Month XXXXX +0.87%
- X Months XXXXX +13%
- X Year XXXXX +83%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1429519726347235328/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1429519726347235328/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1429519726347235328/influence)
---

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  XXXXX% [finance](/list/finance)  XXXXX% [exchanges](/list/exchanges)  #977 [stocks](/list/stocks)  XXXX% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  XXXX% [countries](/list/countries)  XXXX%

**Social topic influence**
[$egld](/topic/$egld) #11, [egld](/topic/egld) 9.26%, [blockchain](/topic/blockchain) #584, [staking](/topic/staking) #68, [all the](/topic/all-the) 5.56%, [liquid staking](/topic/liquid-staking) #1, [binance](/topic/binance) #227, [money](/topic/money) 3.7%, [has been](/topic/has-been) 1.85%, [interact](/topic/interact) XXXX%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@sasurobert](/creator/undefined) [@bearzilla01](/creator/undefined) [@multiversx](/creator/undefined) [@elrondwarrior](/creator/undefined) [@subjectnumber2](/creator/undefined) [@stefanprocopiu](/creator/undefined) [@rapha_ga01](/creator/undefined) [@lucianmincu](/creator/undefined) [@superrare_bears](/creator/undefined) [@ethuardinho](/creator/undefined) [@christo04644427](/creator/undefined) [@andutabacu](/creator/undefined) [@punisher11576](/creator/undefined) [@jannock_](/creator/undefined) [@vinibarbosabr](/creator/undefined) [@proof_cm](/creator/undefined) [@ovidiuxbt](/creator/undefined) [@beniaminmincu](/creator/undefined) [@zukutoke](/creator/undefined) [@herasel_endar](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[MultiversX (EGLD)](/topic/$egld) [Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)](/topic/$uber) [xMoney (UTK)](/topic/xmoney) [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin)
### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1429519726347235328/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"🗳 Status Update on the MultiversX Economic Evolution Vote 🚩 Important Note: This snapshot includes both normal staking and liquid staking votes. Due to the complexity of the data there may be some errors or omissions. Voting is still in progress and numbers may change. So far 2771 wallets have participated. The 🏦64 largest wallets (14000 EGLD staked) control XXXX% of the total voting power almost equal to the combined 👯2707 smaller wallets (14000 EGLD) holding 49.2%. Despite this heavy concentration the vote currently shows strong alignment across both groups: ✅ Yes: XXXX% (4.24M EGLD) ❌"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1982120725457584297) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-25T16:23Z 1620 followers, 14.7K engagements


"Don't click anything on xExchange official X account it was hacked. The attackers also created many fake accounts just to spread the "news""  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983116685008642112) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T10:20Z 1620 followers, 1669 engagements


"#UPbit made some moves last night on #MultiversX"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983144210858410245) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T12:09Z 1620 followers, 1611 engagements


"Lets be real here. I like #MultiversX for its user experience and its not because Im used to it. Ive looked a little bit into other chains too. But this doesnt change the fundamentals: 👉 The competition is way bigger than it was last cycle. 👉 Theres no huge performance gap anymore. From the list below several chains already have stronger adoption US presence and are backed by major investors. So the real question is: 🔴What makes #MultiversX a real competitor in this environment Lets be sincere every L1 is fighting for the same things: ⚙ The same developers 👥 The same users 💸 The same"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1982766835708682297) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-27T11:10Z 1620 followers, 4194 engagements


"Let me just say this: on the address below you can see that one entity/person is controlling XXX addresses holding a stake of around XXX mil EGLD. He/she/it voted YES with all the wallets. Not to go further and say that XXX wallet controlled by X entities/persons hold a stake of almost XXX mil EGLD All of them voted YES. Yes everyone was aligned this time but let's say someone else would have a proposal that is not aligned with the X entities. PS. Here are not included the team wallets or other validators that are aligned with the team"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1982935648106406011) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-27T22:21Z 1620 followers, XXX engagements


"The most influential entity in the latest #MultiversX governance vote controls around XXX addresses holding a combined stake of approximately XXX million #EGLD. Unsurprisingly every one of these addresses voted YES. How do we know they belong to the same entity Over the past XX days all of them transferred a total of 23k EGLD to the same Binance deposit address. This represents about XXXX% of the total staking power and roughly XXXX% of all votes cast so far. Here is the Binance address that received those #EGLD transfers:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983128662565105712) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T11:08Z 1620 followers, 11.9K engagements


"@RoundtableSpace @EgldHeist showed it on purpose and nobody could drain his wallet. I let you discover how that is possible on #MultiversX"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983199497598709992) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T15:49Z 1620 followers, 10.1K engagements


"#Uber and #Revolut used VC money to subsidize early growth - they basically paid for customer acquisition at first using the VCs money. That was the bet. #MultiversX wants to do something similar but with a twist: using token inflation instead of investor capital. They just hope that after inflation capital will come. Same logic different cost and different risk. - VCs got diluted there. - Token holders get diluted here. In the real economy this is called growth subsidies. What #MultiversX is doing is growth subsidies on steroids. Is it good Only time will tell"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1980573219271676216) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-21T09:53Z 1616 followers, 3188 engagements


"@xRrommeoo And the 2700 wallets are not even users. There are many wallets that have the same user voting"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1982132844127261014) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-25T17:11Z 1620 followers, XXX engagements


"@ElrondWarrior @StefanProcopiu @lucianmincu @SasuRobert @MultiversX Sure"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983108106654753178) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T09:46Z 1620 followers, XX engagements


"I wanted @beniaminmincu to see this proposal. It seems he did but the comment was hidden. Why @SasuRobert Im reaching out to you because youre one of the few who genuinely tries to build a bridge between MVX and the community. We may not always agree but at least we can have real discussions. How is it acceptable to hide a comment that shares a valuable proposal You can disagree with it you can respond to it but hiding it Thats not how open dialogue should work especially in this context"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1974566797501214781) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-04T20:06Z 1620 followers, 8706 engagements


"Guys you might not agree with everything in this economics upgrade on #MultiversX but have you seen this kind of marathon discussion happening on any other chain Theres something genuinely positive here and I really love to see it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1975975035618869516) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-08T17:22Z 1620 followers, 9850 engagements


"If the #MultiversX Foundation holds the majority stake in #xMoney would you agree that it should sell xMoney and other owned assets and use the funds for $EGLD buybacks and continued chain development instead of increasing the supply any further"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1977451942319476849) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-12T19:10Z 1620 followers, 4001 engagements


"Interesting to see that the #MultiversX Foundation has recently started moving tokens from Binance to distribute to users who buy $EGLD through xPortal. Its a positive sign at least it puts some buying pressure on the price. Were not talking about huge amounts or whales here but its still notable: roughly 40k $EGLD withdrawn from Binance in the last XX days and distributed across about 2200 wallets. The remaining half likely comes from Foundation-controlled wallets"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1980332972336124175) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-20T17:59Z 1622 followers, 4739 engagements


"I appreciate Alex Tabarrok but that take feels a bit like childish thinking. Its basically saying MVX has no value at all like theres no difference between $X and $XX per coin. Oh sure being XX% down is totally fine right 😅 Now imagine having $100k in $EGLD at $10/coin would you really say what are we afraid to lose Try that one with your portfolio open or while pitching to investors. 😂"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1980562487230533640) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-21T09:11Z 1622 followers, XXX engagements


"Even if I dont fully agree with their plan its still better than doing nothing. $EGLD had a major advantage being scarce carrying the name e-Gold that had strong marketing potential. If the funds had been spent more wisely focusing on blockchain fundamentals and attracting new builders instead of acquiring other companies and hiring hundreds of people who were later fired things could have been very different. There have been many poor management decisions along the way. But here we are now and if nothing changes as they like to say - oan handrd prsent the next bear market could mark the end"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1980568004665528781) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-21T09:33Z 1622 followers, XXX engagements


"Looking at the #Kadena chart its striking how similar it looks to $EGLD chart right up to the point where Kadena announced they were shutting down operations due to lack of funds. Maybe #MultiversX still has a chance but the similarities between the two charts only confirm what Ive been saying for a long time: the price is telling a story. If you listen carefully you dont need to know much about the fundamentals. For Kadena it ended badly though theres still a chance this time with the community taking control. We are ready to engage with the Kadena community to discuss how we can aid the"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1980889297164161060) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-22T06:49Z 1621 followers, 5432 engagements


"The moment has arrived vote according to your convictions. Im still waiting for the promised transparency report; without it I wont be casting my vote"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1981060436079628668) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-22T18:09Z 1620 followers, 3897 engagements


"So. let's see what's here"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1981089817955094724) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-22T20:06Z 1621 followers, 2548 engagements


"It would have been better to be more transparent than this - $EGLD and other assets"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1981095234105987572) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-22T20:28Z 1620 followers, 1446 engagements


"🗳Status on the MultiversX Economic Evolution Vote 🚩Important Note: this is based only on votes coming from normal staking excluding the liquid staking voters. Also it doesn't contain all the data vote is still in process anything can change. Out of 1136 wallets that participated until the moment of the analysis the XX largest wallets (20000 EGLD staked) controlled XXXX% of the total voting power almost equal to the remaining 1106 wallets combined. Despite this concentration both large and small holders voted overwhelmingly in favor of the proposal: ✅ Yes: XXXX% (2.73 M EGLD) ❌ No: XXX% (158"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1981341817594315238) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-23T12:47Z 1620 followers, 5611 engagements


"Similar #Bitcoin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1982771545157349579) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-27T11:29Z 1620 followers, XXX engagements


"@Subjectnumber2 😅 so cheap. 100x potential"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1982876650552668467) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-27T18:26Z 1620 followers, XXX engagements


"Let me just say this: on the address below you can see that one entity/person is controlling XXX addresses holding a stake of around $XXX mil. He/she/it voted YES with all the wallets. Not to go further and say that XXX wallet controlled by X entities/persons hold a stake of almost $XXX mil All of them voted YES. Yes everyone was aligned this time but let's say someone else would have a proposal that is not aligned with the X entities. Please correct me if I am wrong. PS. Here are not included the team wallets or other validators that are aligned with the team"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1982931542088249765) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-27T22:04Z 1620 followers, XXX engagements


"This time everyone was aligned but the real issue appears when a small group say XXX people can swing the vote in their favor against the majority. Im not referring specifically to this proposal but in general: if a proposal doesnt serve the interests of a few large holders it simply wont pass. Is that how it should be Should a blockchain operate like a public company where voting power reflects ownership or more like a city or nation where people build together and use the token to exchange value and services In my view the governance model is far from ideal and the real root of the problem"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983081566256459792) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T08:01Z 1622 followers, XXX engagements


"What I propose for future governance voting mechanisms: voting should be allowed only for those who have an active stake but every vote should carry equal weight. The main challenge is ensuring that each vote belongs to a unique individual. This could be addressed through identity verification systems such as Proof of Humanity BrightID or Worldcoin or any other decentralized identity protocol that aligns with blockchain principles. From a technical standpoint this is entirely feasible. Under such a system even someone who controls XXX addresses holding a total of XXX million EGLD would still"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983102657733550235) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T09:24Z 1622 followers, XXX engagements


"I understand but there are solutions and we should strive for the best ones. The ultimate question is a philosophical one about the fundamental principles: how should we see a blockchain Is it meant to be pure democracy or a system where power concentrates over the many Ultimately the Foundation should aim to pursue the best and fairest solution possible. It is a matter of will and not of possibility"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983107396265271499) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T09:43Z 1618 followers, XXX engagements


"@SasuRobert @StefanProcopiu @lucianmincu @MultiversX And about that "whale" we know and you know who that is. 😏"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983107850957431098) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T09:45Z 1620 followers, XXX engagements


"@ElrondWarrior @StefanProcopiu @lucianmincu @SasuRobert @MultiversX You can't have a real discussion with a guy who has that attitude. That's why I appreciate the most @SasuRobert because he can have civilised discussions without making personal attacks if we disagree. You need some maturity for that. So again Robert you have my respect"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983109415210565754) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T09:51Z 1622 followers, XX engagements


"@SasuRobert @StefanProcopiu @lucianmincu @MultiversX Agree. It's the best approach when the tokens were earned/bought with real money and not allocated"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983114862919332270) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T10:13Z 1621 followers, XXX engagements


"@d_bartesch @MultiversX I don't think it's the Foundation at least it shouldn't be"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983149999363108884) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T12:32Z 1620 followers, XXX engagements


"@mihaieremia_ As number of wallets but not as voting power"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983166299481223543) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T13:37Z 1622 followers, XXX engagements


"This is really something great"  
[X Link](https://x.com/solver_cs/status/1983235618663501966) [@solver_cs](/creator/x/solver_cs) 2025-10-28T18:13Z 1620 followers, 2972 engagements