[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @mononautical mononaut mononaut posts on X about bitcoin, transactions, blockchain, inscription the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXXX -XX% - X Month XXXXXXX +199% - X Months XXXXXXXXX +4.90% - X Year XXXXXXXXX -XX% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/posts_active)  - X Week XX +233% - X Month XX +108% - X Months XXX +61% - X Year XXX -XX% ### Followers: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/followers)  - X Week XXXXXX +0.36% - X Month XXXXXX +0.59% - X Months XXXXXX +7.90% - X Year XXXXXX +20% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/influence) --- **Social category influence** [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) #802 [finance](/list/finance) XXXX% [countries](/list/countries) XXXX% [travel destinations](/list/travel-destinations) XXXX% [social networks](/list/social-networks) XXXX% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands) XXXX% **Social topic influence** [bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) #377, [transactions](/topic/transactions) #1347, [blockchain](/topic/blockchain) 1.28%, [inscription](/topic/inscription) #1, [anchor](/topic/anchor) #567, [angels](/topic/angels) 0.64%, [flights](/topic/flights) 0.64%, [clever](/topic/clever) 0.64%, [saving](/topic/saving) 0.64%, [strategic reserve](/topic/strategic-reserve) XXXX% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@peterktodd](/creator/undefined) [@lukedashjr](/creator/undefined) [@w_s_bitcoin](/creator/undefined) [@nurinuri24533](/creator/undefined) [@theinstagibbs](/creator/undefined) [@owenkemeys](/creator/undefined) [@ajtowns](/creator/undefined) [@satflation](/creator/undefined) [@btctogether](/creator/undefined) [@rot13maxi](/creator/undefined) [@gm7t2](/creator/undefined) [@embii4u](/creator/undefined) [@orangesurfbtc](/creator/undefined) [@stutxo](/creator/undefined) [@cryptoquick](/creator/undefined) [@bearaware4](/creator/undefined) [@blockcryptology](/creator/undefined) [@thatwagmigirl](/creator/undefined) [@kiawtzin](/creator/undefined) [@adamamcbride](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1386812674156253196/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Running bitcoin v30" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1976529550499852741) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-10T06:05Z 20.7K followers, 32.4K engagements "@GrassFedBitcoin @OrangeSurfBTC afaik this is the first time I've had a straight answer and Luke hid my tweet rather than respond to a slightly different question. I ask because it seems wildly reckless to promote DATUM without any safeguards while consensus rules allow "completely insane" transactions" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978337217773801777) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-15T05:48Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements "(and sure enough BRC-20 indexers like Unisat show these as failed transfers/sends because the RBFer's address has insufficient balance to fund the operation)" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977582012568596677) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements "we should urgently soft-fork to ban zero-valued inputs and outputs by consensus for the sake of my poor transaction flow diagram ðŸ˜" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1976987902736580946) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-11T12:27Z 20.7K followers, 10K engagements "Bitcoin Core v30 is not priced in" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1974674794332479549) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-05T03:15Z 20.7K followers, 14.7K engagements "Good night sweet blockchain And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977316640208695301) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-12T10:13Z 20.7K followers, 8054 engagements "@theinstagibbs @const_quary and until a few months ago they were using P2WPKH dust amounts (under a different address which casually holds an 11.22+ BTC balance.)" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977722328130752948) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-13T13:05Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements "so maybe that's the point is this a clever way to cancel a BRC-20 transfer in the mempool mid-execution .probably not. someone wanting to do that could simply not spend the inscription output in the first place. and relying on a non-standard RBF would be very unreliable" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977582015529750873) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements "this transaction embeds a 57.3kb animated gif across 1859 fake P2WSH outputs. lucky it wasn't in an op_return" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1974493719719268610) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-04T15:16Z 20.7K followers, 250.9K engagements "the missing OP_CHECKSIG in the locking script means that the subsequent RBF transaction is able to spend the same output by replacing that witness item with a single random byte (saving some extra weight)" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977582007485108246) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements "El Salvador's Bitcoin Office just migrated their Strategic Reserve holdings into XX new addresses with up to XXX BTC per UTXO. This marks the transition to a new wallet management strategy aiming to avoid address reuse" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1961575881501221171) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-08-29T23:45Z 20.7K followers, 134.2K engagements "somehow I missed this Clementine kickoff transaction hitting mainnet last week 👀" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1976987821656490245) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-11T12:26Z 20.7K followers, 31.5K engagements "Time-traveling blocks No not really - Mempool displays the self-reported timestamp set by the miner which by consensus is allowed to drift up to two hours into the future or back to the median timestamps of the previous XX blocks" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977950610457833901) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-14T04:12Z 20.7K followers, 21.8K engagements "@carlostoriello the link inside the link is to" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977956794896130479) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-14T04:37Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements "@MarketAnarchy21 abandoned dust" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978793989089440089) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T12:03Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements "@bearaware4 victory the premise of the tweet is that bitcoin is dead the doomsayers were right all along" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977668584324395320) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-13T09:31Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements "@utxoclub @LukeDashjr @privacymatter21 I think Luke might argue that unless the revelation was in a block the data isn't really "on bitcoin" and the indistinguishable transaction alone isn't spam. and that you could detect and filter such a revelation tx itself to maintain that state of affairs" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978793173515432257) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T12:00Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements "your shitcoin-on-bitcoin protocol hasn't really made it until there's a dedicated filter in Bitcoin Knots" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1976672434628804762) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-10T15:33Z 20.7K followers, 17.9K engagements "all very reasonable objections the blocksize limit is the pricing mechanism we have to allocate space in the historical blockchain data that every full node has to download and validate. the utxoset is a more costly resource (needs fast random access) and the size sets a lower bound on the storage requirements for a pruned node. but we don't have a coherent pricing mechanism to allocate space in the utxoset and as a result it has massively expanded in recent years (in the same way that any community-subsidized resource gets abused by freeloaders). if you can think of a more acceptable" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1979010127182336024) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-17T02:22Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements "momentum is building but we still need a name" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978309485757116583) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-15T03:58Z 20.7K followers, 21.5K engagements "sweeping an insecure input is very much like sweeping a lightning anchor (neither is signed so they can be spent by anyone) so they've probably either equipped their bot to automatically detect and steal unsigned inputs in general or are deliberately trolling this BRC-20 user" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977582022643298671) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, 1686 engagements "the dust limit is so cooked" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978458096390283475) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-15T13:49Z 20.7K followers, 103.9K engagements "but what's even the point the input was already dust so the RBFer only extracted XXX sats. you might assume they're stealing the BRC-20 tokens themselves (which do apparently have some non-trivial value) but BRC-20 transfers don't work that way" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977582010068791750) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements "@osborne_sam uh oh" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978651521916219407) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T02:37Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements "OP_TANK_RETURN finally got mined" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978642155083280813) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T02:00Z 20.7K followers, 18.1K engagements "@LukeDashjr if a single instance of illegal content is genuinely an existential threat to Bitcoin surely DATUM is an intolerable risk before you'd need cooperation from a major pool like this but now anyone can literally get paid by Ocean to quietly work on their own attack block" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1975210685392122359) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-06T14:44Z 20.7K followers, 90.3K engagements "@byronhambly a multiple of the effective fee rate of the transaction that creates it" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978739278482907396) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T08:26Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements "the destination address of these consolidations is a prolific lightning sweeper doing several hundred lightning anchor consolidation transactions per month" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977582019749327262) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements "the more I think about it the more I like the idea of a demurrage soft-fork: a minimum "storage fee" to spend a UTXO increasing with age once the fee exceeds the value of the UTXO it becomes unspendable and can be pruned from the UTXO set not retroactive so non-confiscatory" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978663487044743458) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T03:25Z 20.7K followers, 8504 engagements "here's a curious mempool mystery 🕵♂👀 someone made a bunch of transactions like this in recent months "stealing" insecure brc-20 transfer inscriptions to sub-dust outputs these transactions should be non-standard but they're reliably mined by both Mara and Antpool & Friends" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977581997972455579) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, 12.9K engagements "@theinstagibbs @const_quary it isn't always XXX sats - sometimes they opportunistically consolidate with another low valued UTXO if they have one available from a recent lightning anchor sweep" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977721017066721666) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-13T13:00Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements "@stutxo goddammit first Bitcoin Inquisition and now this 😩" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978310732941820235) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-15T04:03Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements "the original transactions (pre-RBF) look like this: a fairly ordinary brc-20 transfer sending the inscription to a dust utxo with an additional input to pay fees and an additional output for change all owned by the same address" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1977582000434446627) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements "unfortunately "I Can't Believe it's Knot Bitcoin" doesn't fit in a twitter poll" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978309805413405042) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-15T03:59Z 20.7K followers, 2600 engagements "2.73% to 146.72T the first negative adjustment in over XXX days bringing the difficulty back below 150T although network hashrate remains comfortably above X Zetahash/s" [X Link](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1978706675092595116) [@mononautical](/creator/x/mononautical) 2025-10-16T06:16Z 20.7K followers, 1374 engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
mononaut posts on X about bitcoin, transactions, blockchain, inscription the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence cryptocurrencies #802 finance XXXX% countries XXXX% travel destinations XXXX% social networks XXXX% technology brands XXXX%
Social topic influence bitcoin #377, transactions #1347, blockchain 1.28%, inscription #1, anchor #567, angels 0.64%, flights 0.64%, clever 0.64%, saving 0.64%, strategic reserve XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @peterktodd @lukedashjr @w_s_bitcoin @nurinuri24533 @theinstagibbs @owenkemeys @ajtowns @satflation @btctogether @rot13maxi @gm7t2 @embii4u @orangesurfbtc @stutxo @cryptoquick @bearaware4 @blockcryptology @thatwagmigirl @kiawtzin @adamamcbride
Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Running bitcoin v30"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-10T06:05Z 20.7K followers, 32.4K engagements
"@GrassFedBitcoin @OrangeSurfBTC afaik this is the first time I've had a straight answer and Luke hid my tweet rather than respond to a slightly different question. I ask because it seems wildly reckless to promote DATUM without any safeguards while consensus rules allow "completely insane" transactions"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-15T05:48Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements
"(and sure enough BRC-20 indexers like Unisat show these as failed transfers/sends because the RBFer's address has insufficient balance to fund the operation)"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements
"we should urgently soft-fork to ban zero-valued inputs and outputs by consensus for the sake of my poor transaction flow diagram ðŸ˜"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-11T12:27Z 20.7K followers, 10K engagements
"Bitcoin Core v30 is not priced in"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-05T03:15Z 20.7K followers, 14.7K engagements
"Good night sweet blockchain And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-12T10:13Z 20.7K followers, 8054 engagements
"@theinstagibbs @const_quary and until a few months ago they were using P2WPKH dust amounts (under a different address which casually holds an 11.22+ BTC balance.)"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-13T13:05Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements
"so maybe that's the point is this a clever way to cancel a BRC-20 transfer in the mempool mid-execution .probably not. someone wanting to do that could simply not spend the inscription output in the first place. and relying on a non-standard RBF would be very unreliable"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements
"this transaction embeds a 57.3kb animated gif across 1859 fake P2WSH outputs. lucky it wasn't in an op_return"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-04T15:16Z 20.7K followers, 250.9K engagements
"the missing OP_CHECKSIG in the locking script means that the subsequent RBF transaction is able to spend the same output by replacing that witness item with a single random byte (saving some extra weight)"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements
"El Salvador's Bitcoin Office just migrated their Strategic Reserve holdings into XX new addresses with up to XXX BTC per UTXO. This marks the transition to a new wallet management strategy aiming to avoid address reuse"
X Link @mononautical 2025-08-29T23:45Z 20.7K followers, 134.2K engagements
"somehow I missed this Clementine kickoff transaction hitting mainnet last week 👀"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-11T12:26Z 20.7K followers, 31.5K engagements
"Time-traveling blocks No not really - Mempool displays the self-reported timestamp set by the miner which by consensus is allowed to drift up to two hours into the future or back to the median timestamps of the previous XX blocks"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-14T04:12Z 20.7K followers, 21.8K engagements
"@carlostoriello the link inside the link is to"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-14T04:37Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements
"@MarketAnarchy21 abandoned dust"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-16T12:03Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements
"@bearaware4 victory the premise of the tweet is that bitcoin is dead the doomsayers were right all along"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-13T09:31Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements
"@utxoclub @LukeDashjr @privacymatter21 I think Luke might argue that unless the revelation was in a block the data isn't really "on bitcoin" and the indistinguishable transaction alone isn't spam. and that you could detect and filter such a revelation tx itself to maintain that state of affairs"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-16T12:00Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements
"your shitcoin-on-bitcoin protocol hasn't really made it until there's a dedicated filter in Bitcoin Knots"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-10T15:33Z 20.7K followers, 17.9K engagements
"all very reasonable objections the blocksize limit is the pricing mechanism we have to allocate space in the historical blockchain data that every full node has to download and validate. the utxoset is a more costly resource (needs fast random access) and the size sets a lower bound on the storage requirements for a pruned node. but we don't have a coherent pricing mechanism to allocate space in the utxoset and as a result it has massively expanded in recent years (in the same way that any community-subsidized resource gets abused by freeloaders). if you can think of a more acceptable"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-17T02:22Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements
"momentum is building but we still need a name"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-15T03:58Z 20.7K followers, 21.5K engagements
"sweeping an insecure input is very much like sweeping a lightning anchor (neither is signed so they can be spent by anyone) so they've probably either equipped their bot to automatically detect and steal unsigned inputs in general or are deliberately trolling this BRC-20 user"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, 1686 engagements
"the dust limit is so cooked"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-15T13:49Z 20.7K followers, 103.9K engagements
"but what's even the point the input was already dust so the RBFer only extracted XXX sats. you might assume they're stealing the BRC-20 tokens themselves (which do apparently have some non-trivial value) but BRC-20 transfers don't work that way"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@osborne_sam uh oh"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-16T02:37Z 20.7K followers, XX engagements
"OP_TANK_RETURN finally got mined"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-16T02:00Z 20.7K followers, 18.1K engagements
"@LukeDashjr if a single instance of illegal content is genuinely an existential threat to Bitcoin surely DATUM is an intolerable risk before you'd need cooperation from a major pool like this but now anyone can literally get paid by Ocean to quietly work on their own attack block"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-06T14:44Z 20.7K followers, 90.3K engagements
"@byronhambly a multiple of the effective fee rate of the transaction that creates it"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-16T08:26Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements
"the destination address of these consolidations is a prolific lightning sweeper doing several hundred lightning anchor consolidation transactions per month"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements
"the more I think about it the more I like the idea of a demurrage soft-fork: a minimum "storage fee" to spend a UTXO increasing with age once the fee exceeds the value of the UTXO it becomes unspendable and can be pruned from the UTXO set not retroactive so non-confiscatory"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-16T03:25Z 20.7K followers, 8504 engagements
"here's a curious mempool mystery 🕵♂👀 someone made a bunch of transactions like this in recent months "stealing" insecure brc-20 transfer inscriptions to sub-dust outputs these transactions should be non-standard but they're reliably mined by both Mara and Antpool & Friends"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, 12.9K engagements
"@theinstagibbs @const_quary it isn't always XXX sats - sometimes they opportunistically consolidate with another low valued UTXO if they have one available from a recent lightning anchor sweep"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-13T13:00Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@stutxo goddammit first Bitcoin Inquisition and now this 😩"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-15T04:03Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements
"the original transactions (pre-RBF) look like this: a fairly ordinary brc-20 transfer sending the inscription to a dust utxo with an additional input to pay fees and an additional output for change all owned by the same address"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-13T03:47Z 20.7K followers, XXX engagements
"unfortunately "I Can't Believe it's Knot Bitcoin" doesn't fit in a twitter poll"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-15T03:59Z 20.7K followers, 2600 engagements
"2.73% to 146.72T the first negative adjustment in over XXX days bringing the difficulty back below 150T although network hashrate remains comfortably above X Zetahash/s"
X Link @mononautical 2025-10-16T06:16Z 20.7K followers, 1374 engagements
/creator/twitter::mononautical