[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @IchimokuSatoshi DCA & HODL 🧢 💎 🙌 DCA & HODL 🧢 💎 🙌 posts on X about holy see, churchs, the ordinary, express the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1159202286985461760/interactions)  - X Week XXX -XX% - X Month XXXXXX -XX% - X Months XXXXXXX +1,443% - X Year XXXXXXX +824% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1159202286985461760/posts_active)  - X Months XXX +105% - X Year XXX -XX% ### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1159202286985461760/followers)  - X Week XXX +0.30% - X Month XXX +0.20% - X Months XXX +17% - X Year XXX +26% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1159202286985461760/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [finance](/list/finance) XXXXX% [countries](/list/countries) XX% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands) XXXXX% **Social topic influence** [holy see](/topic/holy-see) #8, [churchs](/topic/churchs) #42, [the ordinary](/topic/the-ordinary) #165, [express](/topic/express) 10%, [roman](/topic/roman) #62, [lg](/topic/lg) #757, [level](/topic/level) 10%, [categories](/topic/categories) #520, [$003550ks](/topic/$003550ks) #758, [leo](/topic/leo) XXXX% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@agusofpare](/creator/undefined) [@yarilogos](/creator/undefined) [@grok](/creator/undefined) [@cloftson85537](/creator/undefined) [@verita_dirigit1](/creator/undefined) [@reziorr](/creator/undefined) [@realdprk](/creator/undefined) [@strixwar2](/creator/undefined) [@iupdate](/creator/undefined) [@sawyermerritt](/creator/undefined) [@macrumors](/creator/undefined) [@alexortodoxie](/creator/undefined) [@minaya024](/creator/undefined) [@gerecht_suender](/creator/undefined) [@brettak04](/creator/undefined) [@carlosedu5593](/creator/undefined) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "That is not how your own system works. In Catholicism a Joint Commission document like Chieti is reviewed approved and published by the Holy See as an official expression of the Catholic side of the dialogue. An officially approved Vatican dialogue document is part of the ordinary magisterium. The ordinary magisterium is binding even when not infallible" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1998834345180836025) 2025-12-10T19:16Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Chieti is not phenomenology. It is a doctrinal statement of the Vaticans position in an official theological dialogue. The Holy See reviews approves and publishes these documents precisely because they express the Churchs teaching on ecclesiology primacy and synodality. Those are matters of faith and morals. Lumen Gentium XX is clear that the popes authentic magisterium is exercised through approved teaching documents and CCC XXX says non infallible but authoritative teachings require religious submission. Chieti fits that category exactly. The nature of the document is teaching not mere" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1998898408007020777) 2025-12-10T23:31Z XXX followers, XX engagements "The Vatican and the Holy See act in the name of the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff. Lumen Gentium itself teaches that the pope exercises his teaching office through the organs of the Holy See. That is why it says: His mind and will in the matter may be known from the character of the documents. The document does not need to be personally penned by the pope. If it is officially approved and issued by the Holy See then by definition it expresses the mind and will of the Roman Pontiff in the sense Vatican II describes" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1998895894599790806) 2025-12-10T23:21Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Vatican II does not base magisterial authority on the modern genre labels you are listing. It bases it on whether the teaching is officially issued or approved by the Holy See. If it is then by definition it expresses the mind and will of the Roman Pontiff in the sense Lumen Gentium XX describes. The character of the documents refers to teaching intent not menu categories on the Vatican website" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1998899435947061413) 2025-12-10T23:35Z XXX followers, XX engagements "That point has nothing to do with the criteria Vatican II gives. LG XX does not base the popes teaching authority on medieval genres like papal bulls. It bases it on whether a teaching is officially issued or approved by the Holy See. When that happens the document expresses the mind and will of the Roman Pontiff in the precise sense Vatican II describes. The form or age of the document is irrelevant to the magisterial criteria" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1999007485647344119) 2025-12-11T06:44Z XXX followers, X engagements "@SawyerMerritt Why is cybertruck getting no lease deals Im ready to buy and there is nothing" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1996829734005887060) 2025-12-05T06:31Z XXX followers, 1916 engagements "@reziorr @MacRumors By asking Samsung" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1998659951699595679) 2025-12-10T07:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements "The point is simple. Vatican II teaches that the lowest level of papal or Holy See approval is still an act of the authentic ordinary magisterium even when it is non infallible. That is what Lumen Gentium XX calls authentic magisterium requiring religious submission. So when the Vatican formally approves and publishes a document as the Catholic position in an official dialogue that approval makes it part of the ordinary magisterium at its lowest level. That is simply how the Roman system works" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1998856768538169742) 2025-12-10T20:46Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Vatican II teaches: If a teaching is officially issued or approved by the Holy See it is an act of the authentic ordinary magisterium and Catholics owe religious submission. It comes from: Lumen Gentium XX The definition of authentic magisterium The requirement of religious submission to non-infallible teachings The fact that official Vatican documents express the Churchs teaching office No Catholic theologian denies this. Quotes: This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff even when he is not speaking ex cathedra" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1998864339718303819) 2025-12-10T21:16Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "Chieti addresses ecclesiology primacy synodality and the structure of Church authority. Catholic theology explicitly classifies these as matters of faith and morals. Vatican II (Lumen Gentium 34) Vatican I (Pastor Aeternus) and the Catechism (CCC 748945) all treat the constitution of the Church and the authority of bishops and the pope as doctrinal. Since these subjects belong to faith and morals any official Vatican approval of a document addressing them constitutes an act of the authentic ordinary magisterium. Lumen Gentium XX and CCC XXX both teach that non infallible but officially" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1998889980417159321) 2025-12-10T22:58Z XXX followers, XX engagements "I have already explained why your citation does not accomplish what you think it does. The Catholic side of the Joint Commission formally adopted Chieti and the Holy See publishes it through its official ecumenical organs. That is the opposite of Ravenna which explicitly states that it is not papally endorsed and not Church teaching. The 2025 Vatican document for the Nicene anniversary goes further and affirms the relevance and doctrinal importance of the Joint Commissions dialogues as part of the Holy Sees ecclesiological teaching mission. Your 2024 quote does not override a later and higher" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1999087148344185334) 2025-12-11T12:01Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Your entire reply avoids the only issue that matters. Ravenna has an explicit non-authoritative disclaimer. Chieti does not. And the Vaticans 2025 Nicene document explicitly affirms the teaching value of the Joint Commissions work as part of the Holy Sees ecclesiological mission. That is the opposite of your phenomenology claim. You keep asserting categories Vatican II never uses and then scolding others for not reading but you cannot produce a single text from the Church stating Chieti shares Ravennas non-binding status. Until you do that your entire argument collapses" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1999195051000463794) 2025-12-11T19:10Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Your distinction collapses under Vatican II. Ordinary magisterium is exercised either by the pope personally or by the Holy See acting in his name. LG XX explicitly says the popes mind and will are known from the character of the documents themselves. or from his manner of speaking. So whether Leo speaks or the Vatican publishes and urges reception the result is the same: it participates in the ordinary magisterium and requires religious submission of will and intellect" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1999216700726948103) 2025-12-11T20:36Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Your distinction collapses under Vatican II. Ordinary magisterium is exercised either by the pope personally or by the Holy See acting in his name. LG XX explicitly says the popes mind and will are known from the character of the documents themselves. or from his manner of speaking. So whether Leo speaks or the Vatican publishes and urges reception the result is the same: it participates in the ordinary magisterium and requires religious submission of will and intellect" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1999216852866838913) 2025-12-11T20:36Z XXX followers, XX engagements "What individual Catholics think is irrelevant. What matters is how the magisterium acts. When the Holy See formally publishes a document and urges the faithful clergy and theologians to receive and advance its fruits that exhortation itself is an act of the ordinary magisterium. Under Lumen Gentium XX and Canon XXX such acts require religious submission of intellect and will even when no definitive doctrine is proclaimed. That obligation arises from the Vaticans manner of speaking not from popular opinion" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1999555087446999051) 2025-12-12T19:00Z XXX followers, X engagements "The Vatican explicitly urges clergy and theologians to receive and advance the fruits of the Joint Commission. That instruction is issued by the Holy See itself. Under Catholic teaching such directives fall under the ordinary magisterium and require religious submission of intellect and will. This is not an Orthodox claim. It is how the Catholic magisterium functions according to Vatican II" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1999559646915469756) 2025-12-12T19:19Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Vatican II is clear. Any teaching that is officially issued or approved by the Holy See as an expression of the Churchs position belongs to the authentic ordinary magisterium. The Vaticans formal approval and publication of a document makes it part of this ordinary magisterium at its lowest level which still requires religious submission" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1998855583991214119) 2025-12-10T20:41Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Vatican II teaches: If a teaching is officially issued or approved by the Holy See it is an act of the authentic ordinary magisterium and Catholics owe religious submission. It comes from: Lumen Gentium XX The definition of authentic magisterium The requirement of religious submission to non-infallible teachings The fact that official Vatican documents express the Churchs teaching office No Catholic theologian denies this. Quotes: This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff even when he is not speaking ex cathedra" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1998865479394640301) 2025-12-10T21:20Z XXX followers, XX engagements "The comparison to Ravenna is a false equivalence. Ravenna explicitly states that it is not papally endorsed and not Church teaching. Chieti contains no such disclaimer. The Catholic side of the Joint Commission formally adopted Chieti and the Holy See publishes it through its official ecumenical organs which is the opposite of Ravennas stated status. Documents from the same study group can have completely different levels of authority depending on whether the Holy See chooses to adopt and publish them officially. Chieti fits the criteria Vatican II lays out in LG XX for expressing the mind" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1999046179896918104) 2025-12-11T09:18Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Simple logic I have already explained: Ravenna explicitly states that it is not papally endorsed and not Church teaching. Chieti contains no such disclaimer. The Catholic side of the Joint Commission formally adopted Chieti and the Holy See publishes it through its official ecumenical organs. That is the opposite of Ravennas stated status. Vatican II is clear that a document becomes binding when it expresses the popes mind and will through official approval as stated in Lumen Gentium XX. Ravenna explicitly rejects that status and Chieti fulfills it. That is the entire difference" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1999051118324904286) 2025-12-11T09:38Z XXX followers, XX engagements "You keep projecting your own tactic onto me. Nothing you listed changes the central non negotiable fact: the documents are approved and commended by the Holy See. Vatican II teaches that anything officially approved and proposed by the Churchs teaching authority participates in the ordinary magisterium and requires religious submission of will and intellect. You have not refuted that once. You simply avoid it because you cannot" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1999209392433225735) 2025-12-11T20:07Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "Canon XXX does not require that a document originate from a theological commission. It applies when the Supreme Pontiff or the bishops exercise teaching authority by promulgating or endorsing a judgment. Here the Vatican acting in the name of the Holy See officially publishes the document and instructs the faithful and clergy to receive and advance its fruits. That is an act of teaching mediation by the magisterium regardless of the documents original authorship. So the canon applies because the judgment is being communicated to the Church by ecclesial authority not because the commission" [X Link](https://x.com/IchimokuSatoshi/status/1999522645717758052) 2025-12-12T16:52Z XXX followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@IchimokuSatoshi DCA & HODL 🧢 💎 🙌
DCA & HODL 🧢 💎 🙌 posts on X about holy see, churchs, the ordinary, express the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Week XXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXXX +1,443%
- X Year XXXXXXX +824%
Mentions: XX #
- X Months XXX +105%
- X Year XXX -XX%
Followers: XXX #
- X Week XXX +0.30%
- X Month XXX +0.20%
- X Months XXX +17%
- X Year XXX +26%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence
Social category influence finance XXXXX% countries XX% technology brands XXXXX%
Social topic influence holy see #8, churchs #42, the ordinary #165, express 10%, roman #62, lg #757, level 10%, categories #520, $003550ks #758, leo XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @agusofpare @yarilogos @grok @cloftson85537 @verita_dirigit1 @reziorr @realdprk @strixwar2 @iupdate @sawyermerritt @macrumors @alexortodoxie @minaya024 @gerecht_suender @brettak04 @carlosedu5593
Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"That is not how your own system works. In Catholicism a Joint Commission document like Chieti is reviewed approved and published by the Holy See as an official expression of the Catholic side of the dialogue. An officially approved Vatican dialogue document is part of the ordinary magisterium. The ordinary magisterium is binding even when not infallible"
X Link 2025-12-10T19:16Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Chieti is not phenomenology. It is a doctrinal statement of the Vaticans position in an official theological dialogue. The Holy See reviews approves and publishes these documents precisely because they express the Churchs teaching on ecclesiology primacy and synodality. Those are matters of faith and morals. Lumen Gentium XX is clear that the popes authentic magisterium is exercised through approved teaching documents and CCC XXX says non infallible but authoritative teachings require religious submission. Chieti fits that category exactly. The nature of the document is teaching not mere"
X Link 2025-12-10T23:31Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"The Vatican and the Holy See act in the name of the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff. Lumen Gentium itself teaches that the pope exercises his teaching office through the organs of the Holy See. That is why it says: His mind and will in the matter may be known from the character of the documents. The document does not need to be personally penned by the pope. If it is officially approved and issued by the Holy See then by definition it expresses the mind and will of the Roman Pontiff in the sense Vatican II describes"
X Link 2025-12-10T23:21Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Vatican II does not base magisterial authority on the modern genre labels you are listing. It bases it on whether the teaching is officially issued or approved by the Holy See. If it is then by definition it expresses the mind and will of the Roman Pontiff in the sense Lumen Gentium XX describes. The character of the documents refers to teaching intent not menu categories on the Vatican website"
X Link 2025-12-10T23:35Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"That point has nothing to do with the criteria Vatican II gives. LG XX does not base the popes teaching authority on medieval genres like papal bulls. It bases it on whether a teaching is officially issued or approved by the Holy See. When that happens the document expresses the mind and will of the Roman Pontiff in the precise sense Vatican II describes. The form or age of the document is irrelevant to the magisterial criteria"
X Link 2025-12-11T06:44Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@SawyerMerritt Why is cybertruck getting no lease deals Im ready to buy and there is nothing"
X Link 2025-12-05T06:31Z XXX followers, 1916 engagements
"@reziorr @MacRumors By asking Samsung"
X Link 2025-12-10T07:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"The point is simple. Vatican II teaches that the lowest level of papal or Holy See approval is still an act of the authentic ordinary magisterium even when it is non infallible. That is what Lumen Gentium XX calls authentic magisterium requiring religious submission. So when the Vatican formally approves and publishes a document as the Catholic position in an official dialogue that approval makes it part of the ordinary magisterium at its lowest level. That is simply how the Roman system works"
X Link 2025-12-10T20:46Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Vatican II teaches: If a teaching is officially issued or approved by the Holy See it is an act of the authentic ordinary magisterium and Catholics owe religious submission. It comes from: Lumen Gentium XX The definition of authentic magisterium The requirement of religious submission to non-infallible teachings The fact that official Vatican documents express the Churchs teaching office No Catholic theologian denies this. Quotes: This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff even when he is not speaking ex cathedra"
X Link 2025-12-10T21:16Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"Chieti addresses ecclesiology primacy synodality and the structure of Church authority. Catholic theology explicitly classifies these as matters of faith and morals. Vatican II (Lumen Gentium 34) Vatican I (Pastor Aeternus) and the Catechism (CCC 748945) all treat the constitution of the Church and the authority of bishops and the pope as doctrinal. Since these subjects belong to faith and morals any official Vatican approval of a document addressing them constitutes an act of the authentic ordinary magisterium. Lumen Gentium XX and CCC XXX both teach that non infallible but officially"
X Link 2025-12-10T22:58Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"I have already explained why your citation does not accomplish what you think it does. The Catholic side of the Joint Commission formally adopted Chieti and the Holy See publishes it through its official ecumenical organs. That is the opposite of Ravenna which explicitly states that it is not papally endorsed and not Church teaching. The 2025 Vatican document for the Nicene anniversary goes further and affirms the relevance and doctrinal importance of the Joint Commissions dialogues as part of the Holy Sees ecclesiological teaching mission. Your 2024 quote does not override a later and higher"
X Link 2025-12-11T12:01Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Your entire reply avoids the only issue that matters. Ravenna has an explicit non-authoritative disclaimer. Chieti does not. And the Vaticans 2025 Nicene document explicitly affirms the teaching value of the Joint Commissions work as part of the Holy Sees ecclesiological mission. That is the opposite of your phenomenology claim. You keep asserting categories Vatican II never uses and then scolding others for not reading but you cannot produce a single text from the Church stating Chieti shares Ravennas non-binding status. Until you do that your entire argument collapses"
X Link 2025-12-11T19:10Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Your distinction collapses under Vatican II. Ordinary magisterium is exercised either by the pope personally or by the Holy See acting in his name. LG XX explicitly says the popes mind and will are known from the character of the documents themselves. or from his manner of speaking. So whether Leo speaks or the Vatican publishes and urges reception the result is the same: it participates in the ordinary magisterium and requires religious submission of will and intellect"
X Link 2025-12-11T20:36Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Your distinction collapses under Vatican II. Ordinary magisterium is exercised either by the pope personally or by the Holy See acting in his name. LG XX explicitly says the popes mind and will are known from the character of the documents themselves. or from his manner of speaking. So whether Leo speaks or the Vatican publishes and urges reception the result is the same: it participates in the ordinary magisterium and requires religious submission of will and intellect"
X Link 2025-12-11T20:36Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"What individual Catholics think is irrelevant. What matters is how the magisterium acts. When the Holy See formally publishes a document and urges the faithful clergy and theologians to receive and advance its fruits that exhortation itself is an act of the ordinary magisterium. Under Lumen Gentium XX and Canon XXX such acts require religious submission of intellect and will even when no definitive doctrine is proclaimed. That obligation arises from the Vaticans manner of speaking not from popular opinion"
X Link 2025-12-12T19:00Z XXX followers, X engagements
"The Vatican explicitly urges clergy and theologians to receive and advance the fruits of the Joint Commission. That instruction is issued by the Holy See itself. Under Catholic teaching such directives fall under the ordinary magisterium and require religious submission of intellect and will. This is not an Orthodox claim. It is how the Catholic magisterium functions according to Vatican II"
X Link 2025-12-12T19:19Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Vatican II is clear. Any teaching that is officially issued or approved by the Holy See as an expression of the Churchs position belongs to the authentic ordinary magisterium. The Vaticans formal approval and publication of a document makes it part of this ordinary magisterium at its lowest level which still requires religious submission"
X Link 2025-12-10T20:41Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Vatican II teaches: If a teaching is officially issued or approved by the Holy See it is an act of the authentic ordinary magisterium and Catholics owe religious submission. It comes from: Lumen Gentium XX The definition of authentic magisterium The requirement of religious submission to non-infallible teachings The fact that official Vatican documents express the Churchs teaching office No Catholic theologian denies this. Quotes: This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff even when he is not speaking ex cathedra"
X Link 2025-12-10T21:20Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"The comparison to Ravenna is a false equivalence. Ravenna explicitly states that it is not papally endorsed and not Church teaching. Chieti contains no such disclaimer. The Catholic side of the Joint Commission formally adopted Chieti and the Holy See publishes it through its official ecumenical organs which is the opposite of Ravennas stated status. Documents from the same study group can have completely different levels of authority depending on whether the Holy See chooses to adopt and publish them officially. Chieti fits the criteria Vatican II lays out in LG XX for expressing the mind"
X Link 2025-12-11T09:18Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Simple logic I have already explained: Ravenna explicitly states that it is not papally endorsed and not Church teaching. Chieti contains no such disclaimer. The Catholic side of the Joint Commission formally adopted Chieti and the Holy See publishes it through its official ecumenical organs. That is the opposite of Ravennas stated status. Vatican II is clear that a document becomes binding when it expresses the popes mind and will through official approval as stated in Lumen Gentium XX. Ravenna explicitly rejects that status and Chieti fulfills it. That is the entire difference"
X Link 2025-12-11T09:38Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"You keep projecting your own tactic onto me. Nothing you listed changes the central non negotiable fact: the documents are approved and commended by the Holy See. Vatican II teaches that anything officially approved and proposed by the Churchs teaching authority participates in the ordinary magisterium and requires religious submission of will and intellect. You have not refuted that once. You simply avoid it because you cannot"
X Link 2025-12-11T20:07Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"Canon XXX does not require that a document originate from a theological commission. It applies when the Supreme Pontiff or the bishops exercise teaching authority by promulgating or endorsing a judgment. Here the Vatican acting in the name of the Holy See officially publishes the document and instructs the faithful and clergy to receive and advance its fruits. That is an act of teaching mediation by the magisterium regardless of the documents original authorship. So the canon applies because the judgment is being communicated to the Church by ecclesial authority not because the commission"
X Link 2025-12-12T16:52Z XXX followers, XX engagements