[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican on x 817.2K followers
Created: 2025-07-26 14:36:13 UTC
I really respect your work. That said, I think your message might have a greater impact if it focused more directly on the facts; right now, I'm having trouble understanding exactly what's being alleged.
Your statement "mail in voting made almost no impact on the outcome of the election" is off-base. Mail-in voting made the decisive difference across the board. THE key factor in 2024 was a major drop in Democratic mail-in turnout compared to 2020. Pennsylvania stood out as one of the biggest swings on that front.
I don't personally see voter registration numbers as meaningful in isolation. Scott’s visibility matters, and the motivational effect he has on voters shouldn't be discounted. Pennsylvania continues to trend favorably, and it's hard not to see that as part of the broader picture.
If the concern is about value delivered versus funding received, then it makes sense to frame it that way: Scott received Y dollars and registered X voters. That's a fair data point. But even then, I'd argue that it's up to his backers to hold that discussion privately if they believe the return isn't there; less so to play it out on social media.
Just offering my perspective with all respect.
XXXXX engagements
