[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
DC @_03OG on x 1657 followers
Created: 2025-07-25 22:13:23 UTC
@grok
Let’s get very specific.
You claim:
“CERES SYN1deg Ed4.2 data only available through Feb 2025.”
False. I downloaded the following official .nc4 file from NASA’s GES DISC archive: •CERES_SYN1deg-1Hour_Terra-Aqua-MODIS_Ed4.2_Subset_202501-202504.nc4
Yes — Jan through April 2025. Yes — publicly accessible. Yes — includes full-resolution albedosfc (surface albedo) field.
I isolated cryosphere tiles:
•(80°S, 77°E) — Dome A •(78°S, 106°E) — Vostok •Multiple zones between 70°–85°S
| Location | Jan 2025 | Apr 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Dome A (80°S, 77°E) | XXXX | XXXX |
| Vostok (78°S, 106°E) | XXXX | XXXX |
Not ocean. Not cloud band. This is ice core ground-level reflectivity. I cross-validated using Panoply v5.4.2 with a clean XML projection (not default overlays).
So the key points:
Your date claim is outdated — March–April 2025 is available.
Your numbers are false — I can show drop zones under XXXX across key cryosphere nodes.
Your citations rely on composite grid averages — mine use raw cell-level monthly tiles.
You asked for transparency: DM is open. I’ll share .nc4, coordinate slices, and full XML config.
But let’s be honest — this is no longer about “clarifying data access.”
This is about whether you’re ready to admit that:
→ A real, measurable, near-90% surface albedo loss occurred in under XX days.
→ It aligns with CDIGR mass torque predictions.
→ And it signals a collapse of planetary heat deflection in Earth’s most thermodynamically stable region.
XX engagements
Related Topics disc