[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
DC posts on X about antarctica, events, spikes, drops the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence countries XXXXX% travel destinations XXXX%
Social topic influence antarctica #50, events 5.88%, spikes #59, drops 3.92%, noaa 3.92%, greenland 3.92%, files 3.92%, drift 1.96%, transient 1.96%, sync XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @grok @dmhunt218 @lancita10 @foxholocron @dimovskitracey @nobulart @maverickdknight @jaredleopard @noaa @noaasatellites @noaaclimate @noaaocean @noaaresearch @michael23191816 @phatdick336699 @steelballa @waifuprinter @kitsuneinva @sacoonx @nasa
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"πJULY X 2025 EARTH SHIFT CONFIRMED Three Earth systems moved in sync on July XX. The data speaks for itself: X IERS Polar Motion Earths axis recorded a measurable deviation a transient wobble impulse likely triggered by deep internal torque or crustal mass redistribution. X GRACE-Based Mass Drift Simulation Modeled mass displacement (ocean/crust/core) aligned perfectly with the same time window pressure rebalancing near the mantle-core boundary. X INTERMAGNET Scalar Field (BOU Station) A sharp magnetic field weakening was recorded on July X. This drop occurred at the same time as the axis" @_03OG on X 2025-07-19 05:58:24 UTC 1354 followers, 1157 engagements
"Actually Youre measuring a completely different variable than what I reported. I used: CERES SYN1deg M3C Ed4.2 Surface Shortwave Albedo (albedosfc) You used: CERES TOA Shortwave Flux All-Sky (toa_sw_all_mon) These are not the same thing. What You Measured: Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) shortwave flux is the net radiative balance of sunlight reaching the top of the Earths atmosphere including absorption cloud reflection and scattering. It does not directly reflect how much sunlight the surface reflects. It is influenced by: Cloud variability Solar input fluctuations Atmospheric optical thickness" @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 18:00:05 UTC 1432 followers, XXX engagements
"5. MAGNETIC POLE DRIFT Earths magnetic North Pole has moved 1000 km in the past century now racing toward Siberia. CDIGR proposes this is not crustal but core-induced motion. Albedo collapse = rising heat = greater mantle-convective asymmetry = core reorientation. Pole drift direction (toward Lake Baikal) aligns with GRACE and crustal torque data" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 18:20:23 UTC 1439 followers, 8876 engagements
"Hey Ben youre conflating a few things so let me clarify: Top-of-Atmosphere vs. Surface Albedo Both images I published were from the same CERES dataset: SYN1deg M3C Ed4.2 which contains distinct variables for: TOA shortwave flux (reflected from the entire atmospheric column) Surface shortwave flux (reflected from ground/ice/ocean) I labeled the maps correctly. When comparing surface albedo I pulled the surface variable. When referencing TOA shortwave flux I explicitly stated that as well. So no I wasnt mixing TOA with surface unless explicitly noted and the claim of data miscomparison doesnt" @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 18:39:11 UTC 1439 followers, 1777 engagements
"@grok Lets get very specific. You claim: CERES SYN1deg Ed4.2 data only available through Feb 2025. False. I downloaded the following official .nc4 file from NASAs GES DISC archive: CERES_SYN1deg-1Hour_Terra-Aqua-MODIS_Ed4.2_Subset_202501-202504.nc4 Yes Jan through April 2025. Yes publicly accessible. Yes includes full-resolution albedosfc (surface albedo) field. I isolated cryosphere tiles: (80S 77E) Dome A (78S 106E) Vostok Multiple zones between 7085S Location Jan 2025 Apr 2025 ----------------------------------- Dome A (80S 77E) XXXX XXXX Vostok (78S 106E) XXXX XXXX Not ocean. Not cloud" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 22:13:23 UTC 1291 followers, XX engagements
"Thanks for the follow-up @grok but lets cut through the noise: Your claim that Antarctic surface albedo averages 0.20.4 is a regional smoothing tactic not a refutation of the actual localized collapse I documented. I used CERES SYN1deg Ed4.2 albedosfc JanApr 2025 directly in Panoply. I isolated grounded Antarctic cryosphere zones not the open Southern Ocean or sea ice margins. In prior years core Antarctic zones (e.g. Dome A Vostok) held albedo levels of 0.720.90. As of April 2025 those same grid cells dropped to 0.080.15. Thats an XXXX% collapse in reflectivity not over ocean or clouds but" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 21:59:51 UTC 1292 followers, XXX engagements
"6. ZERO KEY (Venus Harmonic Resonance) The 40.58-day harmonic interval (1/9 solar year) tied to Venuss pentagram cycle governs pressure release and geophysical phase shifts. Albedo collapsed in sync with ZeroKey Gate X (starting Jan XX 2025). The midpoint Day XX aligned with global geomagnetic activity and SST spikes. Albedo feedback is not just thermal it reflects resonant planetary mechanics. Venus is the tuning fork" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 18:22:10 UTC 1439 followers, 8329 engagements
"3. GRACE MASS REDISTRIBUTION GRACE and GRACE-FO show massive Southern Hemisphere mass loss especially from Antarctica and oceanic gyres. Ice melt and albedo loss feed a feedback loop of mass imbalance. Earths hydrosphere cryosphere and mantle compensate causing tectonic stress redistribution. CDIGR links this to an equator shift and mantle upwellings under weakened zones (e.g. Jalisco Kamchatka East Africa)" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 18:19:19 UTC 1438 followers, 9786 engagements
"Important: This albedo drop data is not yet fully visualized in official NASA products like Worldview or CERES plots meaning my interpretation is one of the first independent visual confirmations of a real-time Southern Hemisphere surface albedo collapse. Im just ahead of the curve. For more follow me on IG" @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 03:26:42 UTC 1439 followers, XXX engagements
"Thanks for the thoughtful reply @Grok lets break this down with precision. X. Dataset Source I used CERES SYN1deg-monthly Edition XXX variable: surface_shortwave_albedo. Timeframe: JanuaryApril 2025 Tool: Panoply with raw HDF data loaded directly from NASAs Earthdata portal. X. Interpretation Window The drop I highlighted is not a global average but focused on: The Antarctic continent + adjacent Southern Ocean ice margin Clear-sky windows (excluding heavy cloud bands that elevate TOA but not surface values) In these zones surface albedo fell from typical ice/snow reflectivity levels" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 21:43:16 UTC 1344 followers, XXX engagements
"This dataset was just released. This information was quietly made available by NASAs GES DISC portal between mid-July and July XX 2025 following staged releases of March and April datasets. Confirmation: Public interfaces like LARC and Giovanni lagged behind often only showing up to February 2025 until July 2425. As of July XX authenticated or direct NetCDF downloads (via .nc4 access) now include April 2025 confirming the extreme localized albedo collapse. This means most commentators (like Grok or others) were arguing from outdated sources while I had direct Panoply+GRIB analysis of freshly" @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 03:23:44 UTC 1342 followers, XX engagements
"π Global Earthquake Snapshot July XX 2025 Key Stats Total events: XX Magnitude range: XXX to XXX Strongest quake: M6.3 XXX km W of Gorontalo Indonesia Deepest quake: XXX km Bandaneira Sea Most active regions: Puerto Rico Kamchatka Russia Indonesia Magnitude Distribution Most earthquakes were clustered around M4.5 with a few exceeding M5.5 indicating elevated energy release globally. The histogram confirms a Gaussian-like distribution centered around M4.55.0. Depth vs Magnitude Shallow quakes (20 km) dominate typical crustal rupture zones notably around Puerto Rico and Kamchatka. Mid-depth to" @_03OG on X 2025-07-23 23:42:42 UTC 1338 followers, XXX engagements
"Appreciate the follow-up @Grok glad you confirmed the 2025 data is available. Lets clarify a few more key points: X. Averages Obscure Collapse Zones: Averaging albedo over Southern Ocean + Antarctica hides critical surface anomalies. My analysis isolates land-ice grid cells that historically held albedo values XXXX now reading 0.080.15 in Panoply using direct albedosfc monthly fields. Thats not ocean data. Its cryosphere collapse. X. This Isnt About Trendlines Its a Sudden Surface Breakdown: What CDIGR is flagging isnt a gentle seasonal dip its an abrupt energy absorption shift across" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 21:55:26 UTC 1305 followers, XXX engagements
"Thank for the share Ben huge fan been following for many years Appreciate the signal boost but lets correct the record: I never claimed a global albedo collapse. I demonstrated localized albedo drops up to XXXX% over specific cryosphere grid zones (not global average) between JanApr 2025 using NASA CERES SYN1deg Ed4.2 data. The two maps in question show completely different scales one is global TOA broadband the other is surface albedo by lat-lon grid. Different scope different metric. Anyone conflating the two is either not reading the metadata or deliberately misrepresenting the analysis." @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 16:31:25 UTC 1439 followers, 3069 engagements
"Whats hilarious is that Im not even denying what Im doing or how Im doing it. Ive literally told everyone exactly how to find the data I used how to process it how I ran the numbers and how I reached the conclusion that Earths albedo in very specific regions like Antarctica has dropped massively in a very short timeframe. And whats even crazier is that what Im showing actually matches what were seeing play out in the real world. The best part This wasnt easy to pull off. I didnt just download a meme or repost someone elses chart. I went directly through NASAs official Earthdata portal. I had" @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 21:07:25 UTC 1439 followers, XXX engagements
"CDIGR Hypothesis: These two maps visually confirm that Earths magnetic field and coremantle dynamics are shifting away from North America and toward Siberia matching: GRACE mass redistribution South Atlantic Anomaly growth ArcticMediterranean energy imbalance Magnetic pole torque acceleration Phase V Forecast: When the dip pole crosses 90N and enters Siberian continental mass expect: Polar albedo collapse (already visible) AMOC bifurcation or shutdown Seismic/volcanic uptick in Siberia Kamchatka Alaska Geophysical snap or inversion scenario" @_03OG on X 2025-07-24 18:18:55 UTC 1339 followers, XXX engagements
"@grok Appreciate the reply but now were firmly in damage control territory. Lets break it down: You claim: Dome A XXXX Vostok XXXX (April 2025 1x1 land-only grids) But I just pulled those exact grid cells using CERES SYN1deg Ed4.2 JanApr 2025: Dome A (80S 77E) drops from XXXX in Jan to XXXX in April Vostok (78S 106E) shows similar trend: from XXXX to XXXX Not averaged actual grid values. I verified in Panoply using raw .nc and isolated cryosphere tiles excluding clouds and open ocean just as you claim to have done. Either: using cached or outdated layers (SYN1deg sometimes misaligns April" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 22:07:26 UTC 1292 followers, XXX engagements
"@grok @SACO_on_X @NOAA @NOAASatellites @NOAAClimate @noaaocean @NOAAResearch @NASA Have a nice day you can DM @NASA for that updated information" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 22:31:12 UTC 1304 followers, XX engagements
"THREAD: How the XXXX% Albedo Collapse Ties into Earths Core Displacement (CDIGR) X. SOUTH ATLANTIC ANOMALY (SAA) The SAA is where Earths magnetic field is weakest and its expanding. This region now coincides with warming ocean gyres atmospheric pressure anomalies and downward radiation spikes. Loss of albedo means more solar radiation absorbed near this weak-field zone. As the SAA expands it destabilizes electromagnetic coupling between the mantle and core. This accelerates core displacement and pole drift a foundational premise of CDIGR" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 18:18:15 UTC 1439 followers, 11.2K engagements
"You ever yell at the New York Times for saying Earth on Fire when its one continent Or National Geographic when they say The Ice is Dying and mean Greenland This is the same thing except I actually gave you the data receipts. People are mad because I succeeded. Funny enough the fact that a localized collapse this severe could even occur is actually more alarming. A global average drop would be buffered by areas like the Sahara or tropics. But a rapid albedo loss in a cold feedback region like the Southern Ocean is a major Earth system red flag. Thats the story here" @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 17:00:37 UTC 1436 followers, XXX engagements
"Data from @WxNB_ πZERO REPORT NORWAY HITS 30C FOR XX DAYS IN A ROW Date: July XX 2025 Location: Storforshei Norway Lat: 66.4N inside the Arctic Circle Record anomaly: XX straight days over 30C (86F) 1012C above average This town now hotter than Rome Paris or New York and its in the Arctic. What This Means: This is not just a heatwave. Its evidence of a latitudinal rebalancing of Earths energy a breakdown of historic thermal boundaries. Under CDIGR theory this confirms that: The poles are warming far faster than models predicted. Heat is accumulating and locking in where it should dissipate." @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 05:51:32 UTC 1383 followers, XXX engagements
"For any skeptic I encourage you to do this Here are X alternative verification methods scientific and public-accessible: X. MODIS (Terra/Aqua) Surface Reflectance Data MODIS satellites provide daily reflectance data across multiple spectral bands. Datasets like MOD09GA (Terra) or MYD09GA (Aqua) offer 500m resolution reflectance. You can isolate reflectance anomalies in the same sectors (6075S 50150E) and compare pixel-level values over time (JanApr 2025). Verification: Reflectance bands (e.g. Band X red) dropping from 0.50.7 to XXX confirms albedo loss. X. Sentinel-3 SLSTR or OLCI Imagery" @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 04:02:30 UTC 1439 followers, 5397 engagements
"Greenland Ice Mass Loss (20022023) Data Source: NASA JPL / GRACE-FO Region: Greenland Average Ice Loss Rate: XXX Gigatons/year (Gt/yr) Total Ice Mass Lost (2002Nov 2023): 5638 Gigatons Visual Indicators: Red zones on the map show extreme loss (over X meters water equivalent). Ice loss is most intense around coastal margins especially west southeast and northeast Greenland. The interior shows relatively minor loss or near-zero change. These GRACE-FO datasets contradict claims that more ice is being added than in anyones lifetime. A sustained loss of XXX Gt/year is equivalent to: 0.74" @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 06:10:30 UTC 1421 followers, XXX engagements
"2. ANTARCTIC CRUSTAL TORQUE ZONES The Antarctic crust especially East Antarctica has deep subglacial anomalies (e.g. Wilkes Basin Vostok and magnetic susceptibility hotspots). These act as anchor points resisting core torque. Albedo collapse in the Southern Hemisphere increases thermal input into Antarctic crust. This amplifies thermal-mechanical torque weakening Earths rotational stability. The zero-moment vector now shifts toward Baikal/Siberian corridors aligning with observed pole motion" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 18:18:47 UTC 1439 followers, 10.6K engagements
"4. JET STREAM BIFURCATION The jet stream no longer flows in a stable band. Its fractured loopy and misaligned. Albedo governs heat gradients between equator and poles. Southern Hemisphere albedo loss flattens this gradient jet streams collapse or reverse. This drives extreme droughts atmospheric rivers and heat domes all observed in 2025" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 18:19:48 UTC 1439 followers, 8944 engagements
"@grok π€¦π»β Appreciate the persistence but heres where your rebuttal misses the mark: cherry-picking Dome A and Vostok both static high-altitude land ice regions not where the real surface albedo collapse is occurring. My analysis covers sea ice margins and the Southern Ocean periphery where reflectivity crashed from XXXX to as low as 0.080.15 between JanApr 2025. 2.TOA SFC You keep mixing top-of-atmosphere and surface data. My Panoply plots use albedosfc only not TOA or modeled cloud layers. The mirror is breaking at the surface not in the stratosphere. 3.The drop is regional not" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 23:15:03 UTC 1337 followers, XX engagements
"Actually CERES satellites do report surface albedo as a dimensionless value from X to X its derived from shortwave flux measurements (W/m) but albedo is a directly calculated product available in all CERES public datasets. Regional albedo over the Southern Hemisphere especially below 40S is included. A collapse from XXX to XXXX in that band over a short time is consistent with what the images show and with verified GRACE + sea ice + cloud data. This is satellite-confirmed radiative imbalance not fake news" @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 15:24:09 UTC 1344 followers, X engagements
"Ben the drop I posted is from Surface Shortwave Albedo not TOA. Its not global its regional 6070S band. The data comes straight from NASA CERES SYN1deg M3C Ed4.2 plotted raw with no smoothing or averaging. If you believe that XXXX% drop in that band is impossible I encourage you to audit the netCDF files yourself. And if that region is indeed being painted black by soot moisture imbalance or sea ice loss then we have an even bigger issue. This is not an error; its a signal" @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 20:41:41 UTC 1439 followers, 1210 engagements
"@Michael23191816 @MyronGainesX @CorinnaKopf Lil next to your Ozempic munchin ass lol okay" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 23:58:54 UTC 1318 followers, XX engagements
"Appreciate the repeated check-ins but youre dodging key facts: citing reports Im citing raw gridcell data. The CERES SYN1deg Ed4.2 .nc4 files for JanApr 2025 are available I accessed them directly no delay. Youre leaning on secondary summaries instead of actually plotting surface albedo at 1x1 resolution. 2.Sea ice extent albedo. Youre stuck on areal coverage. Im showing a radiative property collapse clear in margins where reflectivity fell from XXXX to as low as XXXX. You cant mask that with stable readings over Dome A. 3.TOA and cloud shield = distraction. CDIGR tracks surface heat" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 23:19:13 UTC 1325 followers, XX engagements
"A modular interval is simply a way to subdivide a year into equal segments that repeat. In your case its a harmonic subdivision of Earths orbit into X equal parts creating a reliable rhythm for tracking systemic events like magnetic torque seismic shifts or atmospheric surges. This is common in: Signal processing Orbital resonance modeling Climatology cycle detection Fourier transforms" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 01:27:11 UTC 1331 followers, XX engagements
"@Phatdick336699 @NOAA @NOAASatellites @NOAAClimate @noaaocean @NOAAResearch Not the Flat Earth Reddit memes πππππππππππππππ" @_03OG on X 2025-07-26 16:51:46 UTC 1431 followers, XX engagements
"A modular interval is a repeating evenly spaced unit of time within a larger cycle often used to track recurring events with harmonic structure. In this context: Earths solar year = XXXXXX days Divide that by X XXXXX days This gives you X repeating intervals each XXXXX days long" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 01:26:22 UTC 1331 followers, XX engagements
"BREAKING: Earths Albedo Has Collapsed by XXXX% in X Months According to NASA CERES satellite data (JanApr 2025) Earths Southern Hemisphere reflectivity has plunged from XXXX to just XXXX. This is not a model. This is not a projection. This is real satellite data and it means the planet is no longer deflecting solar radiation in key ice-covered regions. Its absorbing it. Data source: CERES_SYN1deg-Month_Terra-Aqua-NOAA20_Ed4.2 Visualized in Panoply by ( Me) What this means: Earths mirror is broken albedo is its reflective cooling shield Loss of surface albedo accelerates: Heat absorption Ice" @_03OG on X 2025-07-25 18:08:35 UTC 1439 followers, 191.7K engagements