[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Endre Stølsvik posts on X about bitcoin, blockchain, transactions, wars the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence cryptocurrencies XXXX% finance XXXX% stocks XXXX% countries XXXX% technology brands XXXX% exchanges XXXX% celebrities XXXX% automotive brands XXXX%
Social topic influence bitcoin #3724, blockchain #2964, transactions #1054, wars 0.71%, shocked #36, money 0.71%, ordinals #207, bitcoin on 0.71%, solana 0.36%, onchain XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @grok @badbitcoinorg @saylor @lukedashjr @heavilyarmedc @swensongeorge91 @shinyazurill @calibrated_lies @euphoriceuler @coryklippsten @adam3us @strategy @leomathheart @spoonmvn @s0nicalchemy @wsbitcoin @baclfoo @rogergilmour13 @whitehouse @zatoichi42
Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) Solana (SOL) Strategy (MSTR) Stride (STRD) Strike (STRK) Strategy Incorporated (STRF) Ethereum (ETH) Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) Vision Token (VISION) The Blockchain Group (ALTBG.PA)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@Badbitcoinorg @w_s_bitcoin You cannot remove it without a hard fork. Do you feel the previous Bitcoin hard forks have gone great"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T19:20Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"Did you even skim it Let alone read it Why do you guys continue with that bs "shitcoiners" Like any of us are into that And I don't understand: Have you not realized that there are TONS of shitcoins on Bitcoin already Check out Ordiscan. It has NOTHING to do with OP_RETURN. Images and shitcoins tons and tons already on Bitcoin. Even tether was on the Omni Layer before ETH and Solana and Trond and whatnot. Omni Layer - or mastercoin - was a "tokens on Bitcoin" layer since a decade ago. You are so intensely barking up the wrong tree"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T19:14Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"Just have to point out: It is not a BUG. It was literally known at the time - that's what is obvious if you read that LLM discussion. That it became such a massive dump of JPGs wasn't understood per se: Everyone expected the blocks to be propped full of Bitcoin transactions. Remember this was in the block size wars and it was at times extremely expensive to get txes into the Blockchain at all. That this pressure has been relieved to such an extent that it is virtually free to use block space wasn't on anyone's bingo card I believe. So now meaningless data is instead put there. Which in some"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-15T10:26Z 1757 followers, XX engagements
"You don't argue in good faith here. And you should read that LLM discussion - it is very illuminating wrt. this entire problem area. "wouldn't announce themselves" - you do know that we're talking about the most public ledger on the entire planet The blockchain analysts would be ALL over a sudden influx of transactions in the mempool with massive fees attached. It is NOT possible to hide on the blockchain"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T18:52Z 1754 followers, XX engagements
"@calibrated_lies @heavilyarmedc "Advocating it" How so The Bitcoin blocks are capped at 4MB (generally under 2MB). Is your thinking that they will become larger now They won't"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T19:47Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"Yes I am wrong wrt. the soft/hard fork. You'd ban the opcode so that at some block height X the nodes running the new code would not accept new mined blocks with new outputs having that opcode - that is narrowing validity. Older nodes would still allow it but new nodes will not thus miners will not produce them"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T20:27Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"@secsovereign @CarstenBKK @eric_lombrozo Secret governance seems to work just fine. You get the public results here:"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T00:13Z 1751 followers, X engagements
"@Zatoichi42 Haha I urge you to read this the entire thread the entire research paper. You only think all Bitcoiners are right-wing because you're generally so loud. You then are shocked when someone like me comes along. There's boatloads of us . in the shadows"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T21:27Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"Huh WHAT You have really not paid attention YES they DO become a part of the live UTXO set the "chain state" FOREVER. Because there is literally zero difference between a fake UTXO and a proper spendable UTXO. There is NO WAY to understand which are real and which are false. Unless the "owner" comes in and shows it. Then you would also need an external "blocklist" of what UTXOs could be thrown away. AND if you know how Bitcoin works such a solution is TOTALLY out of the question: The ONLY truth is what can be derived from the blockchain itself. Anything else can be co-opted by e.g. law"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T19:35Z 1754 followers, XX engagements
"You must have missed the blockchain wars. You will NEVER buy caffe latte on the Bitcoin Blockchain. The price of a transaction on-chain is pretty much irrelevant. (Other than it must be high to have a continued security budget once the block rewards wear off. Bitcoin on-chain is not "spending money". That will be the settlement layer for large txes between large actors. That you as a normal person ALSO can use this central-central bank to store frikkin' Bitcoin is what is amazing But expect to pay through the nose to actually move Bitcoin around. It cost money to use money "in the real"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T16:42Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"@DutyToRebel This is absurd. Have you even checked the ordinals There are millions of pictures of the Bitcoin Blockchain already. No-one will use OP_RETURN for storing images when it is literally X times cheaper to store them in Witness which is already possible"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-13T13:58Z 1751 followers, XX engagements
"@susca_nicola You should ideally host it at your home IMHO. You can still run it on a modern Raspberry Pi if I am not mistaken - given that you attach a SSD to it"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T15:51Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"@jackmallers @Strike Norway"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T20:39Z 1754 followers, XX engagements
"This webpage is RIDICULOUS. "Scams and spam on Bitcoin pose multifaceted threats to the integrity and efficiency of the network. This particular wave of spam started from a bug exploit in Feb 2023." "bug exploit" As the OP here explains it is not an exploit it was known and decided to still go ahead because it was the least worst solution"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T21:05Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"@spoonmvn @Jethroe111 You know this is an interesting fact: USDT i.e. Tether was first run ON BITCOIN It is called "The Omni Layer" previously Mastercoin. Tether used to be very open about their history but it has become harder to find it on their own website"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T09:17Z 1754 followers, XX engagements
"@mattkratter Huh That seems to be a documentation change The man-text (help) for humans was changed to be more accurate wrt. what it actually does AFAIU"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T21:22Z 1755 followers, XXX engagements
"Wow. So you fantastic engineers "blame the coders" While you managed to go an entire engineering career without actually learning to code That's frikkin' impressive. Even more impressive that you then venture into the discussion about how Bitcoin Core should do their job and evaluate the code etc etc. 👍 Read this: . but you won't because you just know everything better"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T19:32Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"@saylor @Strategy @Metaplanet_JP Just wrote about it earlier here:"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T18:39Z 1756 followers, XXX engagements
"You are utterly misunderstanding this. Ask your LLM why. You cannot consolidate a fake UTXO which is literally what it says in that screenshot. The point is that it is literally unspendable because it is fake data not a signed tx - there is no private key that can unlock the UTXO - in the universe. Consolidation as you refer to in the screenshot is spending multiple UTXOs to make a new larger UTXO. Since the fake UTXO cannot be spent it cannot be consolidated - and just lives on forever"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T20:10Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"Okay mister know-it-all right-winger: What do you know about that Shitcoins are LITERALLY already working JUST NICE on Bitcoin. They are called "Shitcoins on Bitcoin" SoBs. ;-) Again you folks are so extremely uneducated it boggles my mind. Read up on Ordinals. They were introduced with the last halving. TONS of them. Same thing as the Inscriptions. ALSO "colored coins" and such have been a part of Bitcoin since 2010 or so. This is not new. You are just saying shit that you have heard TOTALLY without researching it. It is ridiculous. Sad. Why not ask ChatGPT Grok Gemini Whatever patient robot"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T09:14Z 1753 followers, XX engagements
"@saylor @Strategy Well acquiring @Metaplanet_JP and other mNAV X companies might actually make some sense. Do it Buy them with an all-stock deal thus also getting exposure to Japan's market"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T18:18Z 1756 followers, 1535 engagements
"220 Bitcoin for $123561 each. 🤩 ATMs mainly on STRF and STRD and STRK. No ATM on MSTR"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-13T12:10Z 1751 followers, XXX engagements
"@ercwl Excellent technical info 🙏 (Wish I could feed it back to the LLM)"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T23:13Z 1754 followers, X engagements
"Shopping way overkill server for my Bitcoin node which obviously will run Bitcoin Core v.30 😍"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T23:11Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"People that need to get data into the "transcation proper" so that it becomes a part of the txid. They can use fake UTXOs - which is VERY nasty for node runnes - or you can offer them a way that isn't really crap for node runnes - because they will hammer it in there nevertheless. "Setting out garbage cans". Which was the original reason for OP_RETURN back in 2014 or so and still is. But I guess you don't view it that way and since that IS the reason but you just don't like it then we have a problem communicating don't we"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T19:30Z 1754 followers, XX engagements
"It will never be expensive to run a Bitcoin node. Each block is max X MB. When segwit/witness was introduced it was believed that the block WOULD become full - by bitcoin transactions. Remember that this was back in the blocksize wars. The whole rationale for Core was to NOT let blocks become XX or XXX or unlimited megabytes SO THAT it would be possible to run a small full node. So NEVER was it intended to be less than 4MB blocks. That these bytes now mostly consist of cat pictures since nobody uses the Bitcoin Blockchain for transactions anymore was not foreseen. It will FOREVER be cheap to"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T09:22Z 1754 followers, XX engagements
"There are no shitcoiners close to Core. And: Did you even skim it I really urge you to. Because it is very illuminating wrt. the thinking. Basically: Filters and trying to decide in consensus what is good and what is bad is utterly futile. Once the DoS-attack vectors were fixed they could change the system to only rely on fees to keep crap off the chain. Because spammers cannot afford to use block space in the same way that real transactions can. The reason why there are so much images and shitcoins on Bitcoin now is that there is extremely little "economic activity". Even with all the NFTs"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T19:40Z 1754 followers, XX engagements
"@Badbitcoinorg @w_s_bitcoin This is a non-sequitur so I assume you're a bot"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T15:47Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"@simulxxx @knutsvanholm UTTERLY agree. I see a bleak future with the current usage of block space and the resulting super-cheap bytes after 4-5-10 halvings"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T16:12Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"@Badbitcoinorg @w_s_bitcoin Are you even serious It was released like yesterday and VERY MANY have a LONG lag before they upgrade. Let's chat again in a year"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T15:31Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @spoonmvn @Jethroe111 ❤ you @grok"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T09:57Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"Yeah okay that's it then So several countries' agencies was part of this but lookey here a nice chest of Bitcoin - we'll take that. Not Cambodia not UK or whoever was along I find it . interesting. But good that they caught this dude it is insane that things like this exist"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T17:00Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"You should as I did ask ChatGPT or something else about this. Ask about the difference between Ethereum where there are real different implementations (like from ground up) while for Bitcoin there is really only one. You say "90%+" - it is actually 99.5%+. What is the philosophy what can be the rationale behind this"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-13T23:38Z 1749 followers, XX engagements
".@Metaplanet_JP's mNAV was below X now XXXX. Should not @saylor and Strategy just buy it in an all-stock deal Seems very logical - both would they get their hands on a nice lump of Bitcoin outside of markets but also they would immediately be present in the Japanese market"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T13:58Z 1751 followers, XX engagements
".@Metaplanet_JP's mNAV was below X. Should not @saylor and Strategy just buy it in an all-stock deal Seems very logical - both would they get their hands on a nice lump of Bitcoin outside of markets but also they would immediately be present in the Japanese market"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T15:03Z 1755 followers, XXX engagements
"@Zatoichi42 Haha I urge you to read this the entire thread the entire research paper. You only think all Bitcoiners are right-wing because you're generally so loud. You then are shocked when someone like me comes along. There's boatloads of us . in the shadows"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T21:28Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"Bitcoiners Have you seen this website What a problematic and insidious way to lay out a situation. "Scams and spam on Bitcoin pose multifaceted threats to the integrity and efficiency of the network. This particular wave of spam started from a bug exploit in Feb 2023.""
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T21:06Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"No and I could take a long detour of MS Azure and how their OS and security subsystems made/makes it impossible to run a VM - with MSs own cloud using their own OS - thats X GB. Talk about incentives to make it hard to run small stuff But anyway; The blockspace is currently cheap and abundant no congestion. Blocks are on average -2MB"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-15T09:37Z 1757 followers, XX engagements
"@Badbitcoinorg @w_s_bitcoin Wow. What an argument you bring up 👍 You won this one 🥇"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T19:22Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"@calibrated_lies "What DoS vectors Arb data ." Like that's literally what's in that LLM output. But of course you don't take knowledge from a computer right"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T19:50Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"Ill finally spin up a node 🤩"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-12T22:24Z 1755 followers, XXX engagements
"@DutyToRebel What have you read about Knots Start here:"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-13T00:27Z 1749 followers, XX engagements
"I don't use Bitcoin as money because of the tax implications. I would have had to calculate tax on my gain to buy a pizza. Non-starter. If I could stick some Bitcoin on some service that automatically calculated the profit and did my taxes and spend it with a visa-card I would You don't need "L2s" per se if you could have trusted custodial solutions. Like Coinbase Visa-card taking a bit of your Bitcoin every time you spend and tally up the taxes. Or something"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T16:58Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"Elon Musk endorsing Bitcoin answering to "AI is the new global arms race and capex will eventually be funded by governments (US and China). If you want to know why gold/silver/bitcoin is soaring it's the "debasement" to fund the AI arms race. But you can't print energy.""
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T08:51Z 1750 followers, XXX engagements
"If you think frikkin Bitcoin Satoshis Vision token died because of OP_RETURN then I really dont know what to say to you. But my god youre detached from reality. That token was run by the single person on earth that is ruled to not be Satoshi. This change has exactly zero with the blocksize wars to do. When you filter something you censor. I thought MAGA folks didnt like censorship Oh - they do - when its not holy enough"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-13T08:52Z 1754 followers, XX engagements
"@jackmallers @Strike Say I have some Bitcoin on two other brokerages - and I don't like them. Do you have the best custody Is it insured in any way What if you're hacked @jackmallers"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T21:17Z 1755 followers, XXX engagements
"And your point Then we can sum up v30 v31 and v32. It is a fact that node runners are lagging HARD with upgrading. Both because they don't really have to (you can - with one patch - still run Satoshi's original client) and because of security: If you're paranoid you want others to upgrade before you. Thus upgrading nodes is VERY lagging. That already some XXX nodes is running v30 is a statement"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T16:16Z 1755 followers, XX engagements
"@MorongoMongrel @Jethroe111 Yes And that has been a threath to Bitcoin since it started. There are reasons to believe that miners would not let that happen though: Theyd then support their own downfall"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T09:56Z 1753 followers, XX engagements
"OP_RETURN-haters Knotsers and "CSAM attack-FUDsters": Where were you when the 10kB script size limit and XXX non-push opcodes limit was removed Because THAT is what opened up for inscriptions of any fileformat upto nearly 4MB OP_RETURN is a joke compared. Here's an LLM:"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T14:36Z 1755 followers, 3332 engagements
"@satscryption @Metaplanet_JP @saylor Yes totally. Already with Semler which I predicted once they started to touch X (but where is that deal going) and now it seems like most of them. The old "The Blockchain Group" now called Capital B also seems ripe"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T15:49Z 1756 followers, XX engagements
"@GregTonoski FASCINATING that the website doesn't IMMEDIATELY answer the question of its URL But instead goes on with multiple "why spam is bad" "what you can do about it" etc"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-14T21:03Z 1756 followers, XX engagements
"@GregTonoski What are you on about"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-15T08:31Z 1756 followers, X engagements
"@coryklippsten Huh I really thought that trail thing that SEC lost against GBTC was the pebble that started the avalanche of ETF filings"
X Link @stolsvik 2025-10-13T00:39Z 1756 followers, XX engagements