[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Sizecat posts on X about generative, $htk, onchain, nft the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence nfts XXXXX% finance XXXXX% cryptocurrencies XXXXX%
Social topic influence generative 19.05%, $htk 14.29%, onchain 9.52%, nft 9.52%, mining 9.52%, blockchain 9.52%, 6969 4.76%, bags 4.76%, dashboard 4.76%, ethereum XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @foobazzler @mooncatrescue @midnight426 @kayanow73 @justintrimble @mooncat5997 @dustdust213 @rastereyes_ @nathanheadphoto @brckdrtr @easeth @blackstarxxi @0xsoearly @0ldtech
Top assets mentioned Ethereum (ETH) CryptoPunks (cryptopunks)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@Foobazzler I think youre just trying to discredit my posts because they are not good for your bags. The info I put out is genuine and accurate" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-25 09:31:14 UTC 2053 followers, XX engagements
"How many more $HTK will be mined before it gets too difficult/expensive to do so At current difficulty of 5.4T brute-force attempts CPUs are already too weak. Check out $HTK stats on this dashboard:" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-19 06:44:33 UTC 2048 followers, XXX engagements
"@Foobazzler First generative NFT on Ethereum" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-25 05:28:00 UTC 2053 followers, XX engagements
"While it may appear trivial at first to just put POW on an ERC20 token it causes fascinating dynamics on a deeper level with impact on supply and price. $HTK stays perpetually alive with an economic incentive to get mined whenever mining is cheaper than spot price" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-19 06:44:34 UTC 2048 followers, XX engagements
"@Foobazzler Punks are also generative prove it onchain (you cant). Most MoonCat mints are from 2021 yes ca XX% which explains the bad price distribution still ongoing. They all look the same is a pleb take. Each cat is unique each punk exists as identical copy on a 2nd contract" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-25 05:08:29 UTC 2053 followers, XX engagements
"This means there will be an eternal equilibrium between spot price and mining difficulty for $HTK (which again goes up exponentially) as long as there is an efficient market for it" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-19 06:44:34 UTC 2048 followers, XX engagements
"@Foobazzler I only see one 2017 cat in your wallet bought for XX ETH next to XXX PridePunks and other. stuff. 😅 Care to bring an example of bad propaganda I posted Or are baseless accusations all you got" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-25 09:38:37 UTC 2053 followers, XX engagements
"CryptoPunks (Jul 2017): 20k supply on X contract versions. First "pfp" NFT project. Market cap: $1.8b MoonCats (Aug 2017): 25k supply on X contract version. First generative NFT project. Market cap: $18m" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-24 19:57:16 UTC 2053 followers, 2906 engagements
"@Foobazzler Ill leave that judgment up to you darwinism will sort that out anyway" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-25 10:33:39 UTC 2053 followers, XX engagements
"There are maybe 25k highly desirable MoonCats in existence. Compare that to 21M BTC. If more BTC treasuries begin allocating even a fraction of their holdings into NFTs the supply squeeze would be unlike anything weve seen. What do you think happens next 2021 will be a blip" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-24 19:19:05 UTC 2053 followers, XXX engagements
"@Foobazzler point is youre lacking vision and only believe in market-validated consensus a trend-chasing trader mindset. opposed to the mindset of a collector based on a foundational thesis identification of quality beyond often despite differing mainstream opinion" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-25 10:59:42 UTC 2053 followers, XX engagements
"@Foobazzler Theres no opportunity in relying on consensus. and no AG still is not and wont ever be first. 🤣" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-25 10:31:25 UTC 2053 followers, XX engagements
"@Foobazzler The generation-algo is hashed in the 2017 contract. Users wrote their pow-generated cat IDs on the blockchain since 2017. There is no earlier example of this technicality until AGs iterated on it in 2019 two years later" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-25 09:48:47 UTC 2053 followers, XX engagements
"@Foobazzler You think its a league of its own due to price bias. In fact its just a later iteration in the evolution of generative blockchain art" @sizecat_ on X 2025-07-25 09:55:46 UTC 2053 followers, XX engagements