[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@mwt2008 Mark W Tebbutt

Mark W Tebbutt posts on X about fossil, countries, not a, money the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 1400 posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXX #

X Week XXXXXX +56%
X Month XXXXXX +235%
X Months XXXXXXX -XX%
X Year XXXXXXXXX +43%

Mentions: XX #

Followers: XXXXX #

X Week XXXXX +0.12%
X Month XXXXX +0.67%
X Months XXXXX +2.10%
X Year XXXXX +5.10%

CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #

Social Influence #

Social category influence finance travel destinations countries stocks

Social topic influence fossil #97, countries, not a, money, wholesale, gdp, faster, happened, cet, finland

Top Social Posts #

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"This post from Dr. Matthew Wielicki misrepresents the climate science shown in the Met Office Central England Temperature (CET) dataset. Heres a clear and evidence-based debunk: 🔍 Claim: You should have seen it in 1695. A 2C warming happened from 16951735 faster than modern warming. ❌ Misleading Implication: The tweet implies that past warming from 16951735 was more extreme or significant than todays warming suggesting current concerns are overblown. This is highly misleading for several key reasons: ✅ Facts and Context: 1.🔹 1695 was an extreme outlier during the Little Ice Age: 1695 is the"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-22 14:42:32 UTC 7690 followers, 19.2K engagements

"🔍 Claim 2: Only those that work are extremely white and small. ✅ Fact: False misleading and racially charged. Yes Nordic countries have historically been more ethnically homogeneous but that is changing: Sweden: XX% foreign-born (2024) Norway: XX% immigrant background Denmark and Finland: 1015% Immigrants are part of the healthcare sector manufacturing education and services. 📉 Claiming only white people are capable of working or sustaining an economy is both racist and empirically incorrect"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-22 21:24:14 UTC 7689 followers, XX engagements

"@PolemicTMM @7Kiwi @Alea_ Thats because I am on the side of science and truth and not misinformation and delay. 🤷🏼♂"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-24 13:17:15 UTC 7690 followers, XX engagements

"I paid for my solar and home battery system entirely with my own money no grant no subsidy no government scheme. The energy company pays me a fair rate (15p/kWh) for the clean electricity I export which they resell at 3040p/kWh. Thats not a subsidy thats a profit for them and a benefit for the grid. This setup lowers demand cuts gas imports and helps stabilise prices its part of the solution not the problem"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-22 14:52:11 UTC 7690 followers, XX engagements

"Yeah I wonder what could be depleting fast. The percentage of the UKs gas demand that will be met by imports by 2035 is projected to be around 7585 % based on current modelling. Even if the UK fully exploits all remaining economically viable gas fields in the North Sea it wont make a major dent in import dependency by 2035. Under optimistic production scenarios the UK would be able to meet at most 2025% of its gas demand from domestic production by 2035. Even a best-case push to exploit remaining UK gas fields will not materially reduce the UKs reliance on imports by 2035. The most effective"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-24 21:15:10 UTC 7690 followers, XX engagements

"This post from State of Britain uses misleading graphs and false reasoning to blame renewable energy for high UK electricity prices. Lets break down the claims and facts to debunk the argument: 🔍 Fact Check ❌ Claim 1: Gas prices are low so theyre not responsible. ✅ Fact: Not true retail prices still reflect previous high gas prices due to hedging. UK energy suppliers hedge electricity XXX months in advance. Example: The JulySeptember 2025 price cap is based on gas/electricity prices from FebApril 2025 not todays spot price. Even if gas prices are falling now households are still paying for"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-22 21:12:20 UTC 7690 followers, XX engagements

"The idea that 15p/kWh is virtue signalling or above market rate is simply false. UK retail consumers are paying around 2428p/kWh on standard tariffs almost double the 15p Octopus Outgoing rate. 💡 Exporters arent overpaid theyre paid less than half of what the suppliers resell it for. Octopus simply avoids buying peak power at 3040p/kWh on the wholesale market by sourcing it from local homes. 📉 Market price retail price. The wholesale rate fluctuates between 2p15p/kWh but energy firms mark this up with: Standing charges Grid balancing fees VAT Supplier margins Policy costs (which fossil"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-20 16:22:21 UTC 7689 followers, XXX engagements

"@The0xReport @jemmm85517813 @PolemicTMM @7Kiwi @Alea_ Since 2010 the UK has slashed clean energy costs: Solar XX% Offshore wind XX% Onshore wind XX% Batteries 7080% Clean tech isnt just greener its cheaper. Fossil fuels cant compete. 🤷🏼♂"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-24 15:33:39 UTC 7690 followers, XXX engagements

"@PolemicTMM @7Kiwi @Alea_ Transitioning to a decarbonised energy system by around 2050 is expected to save the world at least $XX trillion compared to continuing our current levels of fossil fuel use finds peer-reviewed studyby Oxford University researchers"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-24 13:02:43 UTC 7690 followers, 1693 engagements

"Nordic countries consistently offer the best outcomes for the average citizen: High happiness Low inequality Long life expectancy Strong economies They are not socialist but they are proof that a highly regulated capitalist welfare model works even with immigration. 🔍 Claim 1: Nordic countries are circling the drain due to migrants living off the system. ✅ Fact: False and unsupported by evidence. Nordic countries remain among the worlds top performers in: GDP per capita (Norway Denmark Sweden) Life satisfaction (World Happiness Report 2024: Finland #1 Denmark #2) Employment and productivity"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-22 21:23:47 UTC 7690 followers, XX engagements

"The cost of reaching net zero is small and manageable around XXX% of GDP per year while the cost of inaction could be over X% of GDP. The longer we wait the more we pay. based on OBR & Grantham Institute findings University College London (UCL) & Grantham Research Institute 2023 Their study found that if global warming is left unchecked the UK could suffer economic damages equivalent to XXX% of GDP annually by mid-century. These costs include: Flooding heatwaves and storm damage to infrastructure Productivity losses Public health burdens Strain on agriculture insurance and emergency services"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-20 16:00:54 UTC 7690 followers, XX engagements

"Actually switching to clean energy isnt just about the climate its cheaper than sticking with fossil fuels. 📉 Oxford Uni (2022) found net zero by 2050 saves trillions globally. 🌍 Renewables are now the cheapest power in history (IEA). 💸 Fossil fuels = rising bills war risks air pollution & economic instability. Mitigation = savings"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-21 19:23:09 UTC 7690 followers, XX engagements

".@bbcquestiontime Britains #NetZero economy is booming CBI says Green sector growing at triple the rate of the UK economy providing high-wage jobs and increasing energy security The net zero economy grew by XX% in 2024 and generated 83bn in gross value added (GVA) a measure of how much value companies add through the goods and services they produce #bbcqt"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-02-27 23:14:02 UTC 7688 followers, XXX engagements

"@priffe @MatthewWielicki No I just trust peer reviewed science than paid fossil fuel shills. 🤷🏼♂"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-23 23:25:23 UTC 7690 followers, XX engagements

"@7Kiwi Since 2010 the UK has slashed clean energy costs: Solar XX% Offshore wind XX% Onshore wind XX% Batteries 7080% Clean tech isnt just greener its cheaper. Fossil fuels cant compete"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-24 15:34:23 UTC 7690 followers, 3121 engagements

"@jemmm85517813 @PolemicTMM @7Kiwi @Alea_ Since 2010 the UK has slashed clean energy costs: Solar XX% Offshore wind XX% Onshore wind XX% Batteries 7080% Clean tech isnt just greener its cheaper. Fossil fuels cant compete"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-24 15:34:10 UTC 7690 followers, XX engagements

"David Turver appears to be part of a coordinated misinformation ecosystem that aims to: Delay or derail climate action Sow public doubt about renewables Promote fossil fuel dependence as reliable and cheap 🔍 Fact Check: Claims on Green Energy Costs David Turver claims that: Green subsidies add 12bn/year to bills twice the cost of gas. Grid balancing/backup adds 4bn now forecast to 12bn by 2030. Grid upgrades for remote renewables will cost 80bn adding 74/year to bills. Heres what he doesnt mention"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-19 14:10:13 UTC 7690 followers, 5644 engagements

"@stateof_britain Greedy gas power station owners. Two power station owners to get more than 12m for three hours of electricity Uniper and a subsidiary of Vitol able to charge XX times recent market price to ensure supply during evening peak"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-22 20:10:08 UTC 7689 followers, XX engagements

"Im being paid 15p/kWh for exported power by a private energy supplier not a subsidy. If it were worthless they wouldnt pay me. In fact local solar helps the grid reduces wholesale prices and reduces our reliance on volatile gas. Thats not selfish its smart and sustainable. 🌞⚡"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-22 11:38:30 UTC 7690 followers, XX engagements

"@ClimateRetorts @Eli4Sustain @SpeddingCharlie @adlrope @7Kiwi Exxon mistakenly released climate related internal documents in to the public domain. Here is an internal Exxon document from November 1982 discussing fossil fuel combustion CO2 driven climate change as fact"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-21 19:15:18 UTC 7691 followers, XX engagements

"🧾 UK Context: Net Zero Spending vs Other Priorities UK GDP: XXX trillion (2023). Net Zero transition: 1012bn/year 0.40.5% of GDP. Compare that with: NHS: 240bn/year (22 larger). Pensions: 140bn/year (12 larger). Debt Interest: 120bn/year (11 larger). Defence: 50bn/year (5 larger). COVID emergency (202022): 400bn (40 larger annually). 👉 Even if green subsidies rose to 24bn by 2030 thats still just X% of GDP"
@mwt2008 on X 2025-07-19 14:11:27 UTC 7691 followers, XXX engagements