[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@lsanger Larry Sanger
Larry Sanger posts on X about moses, monk, vader, spirits the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXXXXX +579%
- X Months XXXXXXXXXX +3,282%
- X Year XXXXXXXXXX +2,080%
Mentions: X #
Followers: XXXXXX #
- X Week XXXXXX -XXXX%
- X Month XXXXXX +2.90%
- X Months XXXXXX +42%
- X Year XXXXXX +46%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #
Social Influence #
Social category influence celebrities XXXX% technology brands XXXX%
Social topic influence moses 4.65%, monk 2.33%, vader 2.33%, spirits 2.33%, gods gods 2.33%, files 2.33%, epstein files 2.33%, realworld 2.33%, cgi 2.33%, constellation XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @bjamaste @gregorycwitcher @missj75 @falsely_flagged @drfrankturek @martha_sheshan @xrevoemag @chargeadem @realdeebot @kenrdkab @wwtlpodcast @hansfiene @mblair @carlofavetta @pageaumatthieu @cleeeave @danadvantage @ggmesh @thedonallegedly @free_qi72158
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@KenRDKAB @DrFrankTurek Well when we speak about fictional works sure we do. "Luke didn't know Vader was his father." "Alyosha was a monk." We can even say "Alyosha was my favorite character in the Brothers K" or even "I love Alyosha""
@lsanger on X 2025-07-21 14:24:56 UTC 68.3K followers, XX engagements
"@a_szkarlatny @DrFrankTurek Again the question is not one of proof but of rational support for a position. But yes well spotted those are components. I have whole chapters on such matters" @lsanger on X 2025-07-22 00:06:44 UTC 68.3K followers, XX engagements
"With 20/20 hindsight should I have made Wikipedia or not" @lsanger on X 2025-06-26 18:00:32 UTC 68.3K followers, 20.2K engagements
"@MichaelHorton_'s take on this in his latest book (vol. X in the "Divine Self" series in progress) is fascinating. He says that in a way the Roman critics were right. They were at root or functionally animists. (There were household gods gods of places gods animating forces etc.) "Numinous" might be the better word. They thought spirits were in everything which is a kind of "enchantment" that Horton says (and I agree) we can do without. But if you say there is only one God and creation is his work and operates according to (otherwise) impersonal laws then you are done with that kind of" @lsanger on X 2025-06-11 17:30:33 UTC 68.3K followers, XXX engagements
"I didnt really think that when people finally started demanding the Epstein files to be opened the creeps actually would come out saying Let the p3ds stay in power its for peace and prosperity and besides theyre our p3ds" @lsanger on X 2025-07-13 17:35:02 UTC 68.3K followers, 3942 engagements
"@Cleeeave Yes; Jesus was a Jew and the law of sacrifice under which he is said to be a sacrifice is indeed that of the Jews (or maybe more properly speaking that given to the Israelites by Moses)" @lsanger on X 2025-07-20 19:45:31 UTC 68.3K followers, XX engagements
""Surely we cannot rest the legitimacy of the visible Church on the continuity of traditions that might after allaccording to the examples and warnings contained in the Bible itselfbe corrupted. The testimony of Scripture on the prospects of apostolic succession is sad but clear: ordination and succession are no guarantees against doctrinal or moral failure."" @lsanger on X 2025-07-20 22:02:44 UTC 68.3K followers, XXX engagements
""But if this is true it means that the Spirit-given infallibility of the Apostles in their work would not necessarily be passed along to their disciples any more than the prophetic prerogatives of a Moses Samuel or Daniel were passed along to theirs." "It follows that there is no support here at all for the notion that an unbroken chain of ordained clergy would serve as a guarantee of the reliability of teachers or of the incorruptibility of the tradition."" @lsanger on X 2025-07-20 22:03:22 UTC 68.3K followers, XXX engagements
"Theological (ecclesiological) question: Last winter I listed a bunch of questions that inform one's choice of a denomination mostly about what are called "denominational distinctives": But as I have worked through some answers. - - .I discovered that my decision may ultimately depend not just or even mainly on these distinctives but also on what we might call "meta-level" decisions. Basically this is because it is unlikely that I will find any denomination that I just happen to agree with XXX% except for those that are very "big tent." This then means that I must make the decision in some" @lsanger on X 2025-07-21 02:04:46 UTC 68.3K followers, 1741 engagements
"I don't know how new this is but it's pretty darned cool. Would be dangerousI wouldn't want to fall off at XXX mph. Maybe they could make special "airbag suits."" @lsanger on X 2025-07-23 18:37:55 UTC 68.3K followers, 2173 engagements
"Frank my answer is: I need to finish working on this long theology Q&A. Ive answered XX of about 20-25 questions. I think most (not all) of the big questions are behind me. ChatGPT read my work so far and told me among other things: Summary of Your Position You're articulating a rare constellation: Symbolist theology of the sacraments not mere memorialism High ecclesiology without apostolic succession Liturgical and orderly worship without Catholic accretions Scripture-bound authority without magisterial church claims Faith-based soteriology without deterministic Calvinism. To be blunt: your" @lsanger on X 2025-07-20 03:45:46 UTC 68.3K followers, XXX engagements
"@JackPosobiec Well Jack we can hope that you are right" @lsanger on X 2025-07-23 14:02:25 UTC 68.3K followers, 1584 engagements
"Wikipedia is so ironic. We wanted to give a voice to the voiceless but what emerged was one of the most effective organs of Establishment propaganda in history" @lsanger on X 2025-06-25 19:37:35 UTC 68.3K followers, 1.7M engagements