[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@leroyb756 Avatar @leroyb756 Bad Leroy Brown

Bad Leroy Brown posts on X about souls, eternal, twitter, has been the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 1843 posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: X #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: undefined #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #


Social category influence social networks technology brands finance

Social topic influence souls, eternal, twitter, has been, social security, $3600month, retirement, investment

Top Social Posts #


Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Darwinian logic reverses the moral and mechanistic architecture of every other domain. In no other domain engineering ethics theology art do we treat damage decay and randomness as the engines of creativity. Yet in evolution destruction is framed as innovation degradation as progress and suffering as adaptive necessity. Evolutions core logic is progress through breakdown. - Mutation: Random changes often harmful are framed as the raw material of innovation. - Selection: Death and reproductive failure are treated as filters for improvement. - Adaptation: Traits that emerge from loss constraint"
X Link @leroyb756 2025-10-20T00:02Z 1507 followers, XXX engagements

"Why do atheists act as if their competition in the struggle for life have souls The problem of evil requires ontology. To say this is evil requires a standard of good. But naturalism denies objective morality intrinsic value and eternal purpose. So the appeal to evil is borrowed language a moral vocabulary smuggled in from theism. When atheists appeal to the problem of evil they invoke moral outrage grief and compassion but their own worldview offers no ontological basis for those responses. In strict Darwinian terms a child with cancer is simply competition that's being selected against: a"
X Link @leroyb756 2025-10-23T14:04Z 1509 followers, XXX engagements

"@faithandheresy @frthegratergood Modern science began in Christian Europe in a little know period known as the SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION revisionist twitter atheist. Please consult a history book"
X Link @leroyb756 2025-10-24T14:57Z 1510 followers, XX engagements

"This "identity" nonsense that's gripping the western world is because of darwinism's teaching that immutable traits are fluid and fungible. Except of course for race which ironically is biologically and historically the least immutable trait of all. Darwinism teaches that human traits are the product of evolutionary flux: mutable adaptive and contingent. This framework has been weaponized to dissolve boundaries between sexes between species between moral categories. Identity has become a construct not a reality. Race remains the one category that many institutions treat as fixed inherited and"
X Link @leroyb756 2025-10-21T21:33Z 1509 followers, XXX engagements

"Distance time. This equation is a secular necessity not a scientific discovery. Secular Cosmology Needs a Timeline: Without a witness cosmology must construct a timeline from light. Distance = time becomes the epistemic bridge across the abyss of origin. Its not a neutral tool its a substitute for revelation. The equation of distance with time central to the expanding universe model is not a neutral discovery. Its a conceptual framework that allows cosmology to function as a historical narrative without a witness. Distance = Time is not empirically absolute: Light Travel Time Assumption: In"
X Link @leroyb756 2025-10-22T11:56Z 1510 followers, XXX engagements

"About XX years ago I first heard about privatizing social security for young people. The DOW was at about 1500. Today the DOW is at 46000 Here's the difference it would have made for average Americans. Total contributions: $200000 over XX years. - Social Security payout: $3600/month starting at age XX totaling $780000 over XX years of retirement. - Investment account outcome: - At X% annual return the account would grow to $XXXX million. - At X% return it could reach $XXXX million. - At X% return it would be $XXXX million"
X Link @leroyb756 2025-10-23T01:14Z 1509 followers, XX engagements

"@Tomasdearc @sola_chad We dont vote for pastors"
X Link @leroyb756 2025-10-24T12:51Z 1509 followers, X engagements