[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@invitinghistory Inviting History
Inviting History posts on X about aunt jemima, women, playing, facebook the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Week XXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXXXX -XX%
Mentions: XX #
- X Week XX +100%
- X Month XX +50%
- X Months XXX +202%
- X Year XXX +8.10%
Followers: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXX +0.28%
- X Month XXXXX +0.72%
- X Months XXXXX +4.80%
- X Year XXXXX +3.60%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence #
Social category influence social networks technology brands countries
Social topic influence aunt jemima, women, playing, facebook, the worlds, quaker, ads, france
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@Shannon_10Ten These are what volumes X and X have to say about Nancy Green. Yet you claim the article is somehow an "excerpt" from this book. And oh dear--it claims the character wasn't christened "Aunt Jemima" until 1898 except we know it was AJ in 1889. also before Green was hired"
@invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 02:37:30 UTC 7430 followers, XX engagements
"@Mucculenc3 Aunt Jemima's likeness was not modeled after Nancy Green. None of the logos were based on specific people. The logo removed in 2020 is from 1989 and does not depict any specific real person. The logos used when Green (among many others) played AJ were caricatures" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-25 10:32:33 UTC 7431 followers, XX engagements
"@JilMcIntosh Green was never depicted on the box. Here are a variety of logos from after Green was hired in 1893. Which one are you saying is Green Link:" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 19:17:08 UTC 7432 followers, XX engagements
"@Shannon_10Ten So let's tally. You believe an article that claims Green worked as AJ until 1923 when Green's answers for the US census (and her family's answers in court after her death) said she had no job by 1915. You also claim the article is based on a book which has precious little--" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 02:38:10 UTC 7430 followers, XX engagements
"@Shannon_10Ten My you are sensitive over the facts. Why does it bother you so much that Nancy Green said on the US census in 1915 that she had no job and this website falsely claims she worked as Aunt Jemima until 1923 Why do the facts make you so mad" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 02:17:07 UTC 7426 followers, XX engagements
"@Shannon_10Ten Let's see what that book says and what sources it uses. Because you do know that if a claim is made but can't be backed up by a source that the claim is effectively useless. Right" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 02:28:32 UTC 7427 followers, XX engagements
"@JimDeanVFL @golfrumorsTN @MarioC_00 @itsJohnRocker For instance they claim it was "her" recipe. when we know the recipe was created by Chris Rutt and Charles Underwood by 1889. Green wasn't hired to play the character until 1893 and she wasn't the first person the company hired to play Aunt Jemima" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-22 23:40:06 UTC 7429 followers, XX engagements
"@BooneFowler The Aunt Jemima brand was created by two white men named Charles Underwood and Chris Rutt. Aunt Jemima was a fictional character they based on the "happy slave mammy" stereotype. They later sold the brand to RT Davis who hired real women to play the fictional character" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 16:31:55 UTC 7431 followers, XX engagements
"@Shannon_10Ten None of those ads is Nancy Green and we have zero idea how she felt about it. There is no evidence Green was ever used for the marketing. She was one woman among many that the company hired as an "original Aunt Jemima."" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-22 21:19:24 UTC 7430 followers, XX engagements
"@Shannon_10Ten Lol I've been linked and been to that website plenty. And they've been contacted multiple times regarding the factual inaccuracies of their web page" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 02:16:07 UTC 7430 followers, XX engagements
"@JilMcIntosh That isn't one of the logos I sent you; you said that after 1893 they changed it to Green. Those were all after 1893. yet none of them are Green. That logo is from 1915-1918 well after Green stopped playing AJ and well after your claim of 1893" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 20:14:12 UTC 7432 followers, XX engagements
"@Shannon_10Ten Go check out "Nancy Green and aunt jemima: history vs myth" group on Facebook where primary source research is shared" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-23 01:30:54 UTC 7429 followers, XX engagements
"@JilMcIntosh @Shannon_10Ten There as no "exclusive contract." Countless women played Aunt Jemima in the 1890s with at least one other woman playing AJ in 1893 at the World's Fair. Green's face did not replace the logo" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 19:20:32 UTC 7431 followers, XX engagements
"@JimDeanVFL @golfrumorsTN @MarioC_00 @itsJohnRocker Nancy Green never became wealthy or a philanthropist. She had to work as a housekeeper in her 70s and when she died her family couldn't afford a headstone. She didn't "become" a fictional character" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-22 16:25:58 UTC 7423 followers, XX engagements
"@Shannon_10Ten Sorry that the facts don't match your fantasy. That logo wasn't used until the late 1930s. It also looks nothing like Nancy Green" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-23 01:29:54 UTC 7423 followers, XX engagements
"@AlanJonWarner The original Aunt Jemima marketing romanticized slavery and referred to the character was one of the "good slaves" who rejected freedom in the Civil War. They had the character refer to the business owner as her "massa." Some examples of marketing:" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-22 11:06:31 UTC 7423 followers, XX engagements
"@JilMcIntosh The only time that any specific women were depicted on the marketing are short-lived ads from the late 1930s where Quaker Oats did these pieces:" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 19:20:59 UTC 7432 followers, XX engagements
"@JilMcIntosh Also why would Green specifically be used for the logoThere were numerous women many referred to as the "original Aunt Jemima" by the company as they treated these women interchangably who played AJ at the same time as Green. Why is this logo not Emily Pinnick" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 20:16:02 UTC 7432 followers, XX engagements
"@JilMcIntosh Green played Aunt Jemima for the first time in 1893. The book is making a claim that is not backed up by fact. Manring is outdated on several key points. Again why would Green be on the logo created decades later And when she was only one person among many" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-25 00:18:34 UTC 7431 followers, XX engagements
"@justmarkbefine Aunt Jemima was a fictional character based on the "happy slave mammy" stereotype. The logo removed in 2020 is from 1989 and does not depict any specific person. None of the women who played AJ became millionaires from it. By contrast we know they were not paid very much" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-25 10:32:20 UTC 7430 followers, XX engagements
"@Shannon_10Ten --on Green and what it does have contains a pretty ridiculous and nonsensical falsehood: that Aunt Jemima wasn't called Aunt Jemima until 1898 which was in reality X years after it was registered. as Aunt Jemima" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 02:38:49 UTC 7430 followers, XX engagements
"@JilMcIntosh @Shannon_10Ten Manring is a fine place to start but a lot of his work is outdated now. For ex: We know that Green was not the first woman to play Aunt Jemima. At least one other person was hired in 1891 two years earlier" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-24 19:20:23 UTC 7431 followers, XX engagements
"A photo taken at a special event held at Marie Antoinettes hamlet in 1901. Via Bibliothque nationale de France" @invitinghistory on X 2025-07-22 00:07:12 UTC 7423 followers, XXX engagements