[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@ProofOfCash Avatar @ProofOfCash ProofOfCash

ProofOfCash posts on X about bitcoin, spam, coins, lack of the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #

Social category influence cryptocurrencies XXXXX% finance XXXX% celebrities XXXX% stocks XXXX% technology brands XXXX%

Social topic influence bitcoin 16.35%, spam 2.88%, coins #718, lack of #597, tx #1258, all the 1.92%, has been 1.92%, the face 0.96%, decentralized 0.96%, infra XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @cguida6 @mike_4131 @peterktodd @stevew928 @boomerbtc @dutytorebel @supertestnet @averagejohnxrp @lukedashjr @btcblockjams @niteshbtc @evoskuil @arthur_van_pelt @bitcoinbombadil @samsam94167871 @mike4131 @highstakevegas @stephanlivera @jeremypoley @btcmoneyfury

Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL)

Top Social Posts #

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"@FieldNas This is the core of how Bitcoin can remain censorship resistant even in the face of adversaries like nation-states. It doesn't just turn off as a feature when the txn happens to contain spam"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T01:42Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@agent_scruples And what makes you or anyone the arbiter of what is stupid If it's possible to lose funds at any time due to a developer having a power trip and invalidating your funds unless you move them why would anyone use Bitcoin for cold storage"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T16:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@rleder @aeonBTC @LukeDashjr @GrassFedBitcoin It sure hasn't stopped them. I am an OCEAN miner bc I like to test new stuff. However I'm not going to delude myself into thinking this is actually decentralized. I run ckpool-splns for that at Nothing more decentralized than hosting your own infra"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-28T22:47Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@highstakevegas @giacomozucco @simulx4 @stephanlivera The lack of a robust fee market is why spam exists. Not because developers are asleep at the wheel. That is a lie being fed to you by OCEAN"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T01:26Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@FieldNas Nope. You only need one path from spammer - miner to be successful as the spammer. You need to shut all avenues of the spammer getting his tx to the miner to stop spam. In which case he can just email them his tx"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T01:41Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

""You did something dumb so your coins are frozen and will possibly be confiscated." So much for permissionless"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T14:28Z XXX followers, 2462 engagements

"@AverageJohnXRP @BitcoinBombadil @giovacatallaxy @THOMASLATHAM256 @grixxby @bpay549 @Proverbs_13_11 @SuperhwySurfer @Thenutmegman @KylePLeBlanc @AG_Guus @JeremyPoley @Beautyon_ @BitmundFreud @LukeDashjr Oh my God I need to spend X minutes changing out an SSD. How will I ever financially recover from this Are you delusional You're not Jeff Bezos. Your time is not worth that much lmao"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T19:29Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@SamSam94167871 Permissionless means permissionless. Not "usable only be people that I like""
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-25T16:17Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Knotzis don't want you to know that you can just do things. Subsat non standard OP_RETURNs are not only possible. They're easy to make at"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-25T19:23Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@notgrubles The filterors are progressing to make consensus changes now"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-26T07:35Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@maxipleb @btcblockjams They're pushing a soft fork now"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-26T07:36Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@JStefanop1 @w_s_bitcoin @beeforbacon1 @FutureBit If you want to support the censorship resistant nature of Bitcoin but don't have the technical chops to host ckpool locally you could always point hash at Our block template txs are always viewable"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-26T08:27Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@evoskuil For all the crying from ossifiers about experimenting on Bitcoin this soft fork is ironically a lot of experimenting on Bitcoin"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-26T18:28Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Who's the one forcing things into Bitcoin now"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-26T18:31Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@SteveW928 @evoskuil Spam is not worth forking over. If you think it is you're harming Bitcoin far more than spam ever will"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-26T19:50Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@SteveW928 @mike_4131 @evoskuil You're off by a factor of 4x. It's closer to 100000 nodes. You're looking at statistics for listening nodes only"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T01:39Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@SteveW928 @mike_4131 @evoskuil OpenTimestamps is not the purpose of Bitcoin either. Should it be culled for this"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T02:53Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@SteveW928 @mike_4131 @evoskuil I actually would say that the filter failed if you did that. It has been two years since spam has ended up anywhere besides my spam folder. I don't love Google but GMail just works"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T03:55Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@SteveW928 @mike_4131 @evoskuil If a little spam is enough to deter people from using Bitcoin it is a failed idea that deserves to die"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T03:56Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@mike_4131 @SteveW928 @evoskuil Indeed. Many Knots node runners are unaware of this due to a severe lack of knowledge on how Bitcoin actually works. If your email inbox contained every attempted spam in it while your spam folder was empty. Is that not a failure of filters"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T03:58Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@rot13maxi @intangiblecoins @peterktodd Bitcoin PlebSlop Vision (BPSV)"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T04:00Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@HodlDee @nicksainato It's divisive because it's a needlessly stupid action that will ruin Bitcoin's ability to be censorship resistant. Once you start adding protocol level censorship it becomes more viable for nation states to propose similarly "mandatory" soft forks achieving eg. OFAC compliance"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T12:40Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@DutyToRebel @nitesh_btc Wrong. It removes OP_IF which mini script compiler currently uses. It also makes previously locked coins which have a complex spending script unspendable (confiscation). It also closes upgrade paths for Bitcoin considerably forcing new protocol developers to use just the annex"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T12:53Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@DutyToRebel @nitesh_btc Bitcoin doesn't need to be developed If we went back in time to when CSV and CLTV were being soft forked into Bitcoin and you used this rationale we wouldn't even have lightning"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T16:01Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@DutyToRebel @nitesh_btc My pool will continue mining without the fork. I guess we'll have to see who has more hashpower"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T16:02Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@DutyToRebel @nitesh_btc Nope. You're wrong. I have been embedding non-standard OP_RETURNs long before Core v30 even existed. Hint: LibreRelay"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T16:24Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@DutyToRebel @nitesh_btc I disagree. Why did we need to soft fork Segwit Why did we need to lay the groundwork for the Lightning Network Ossifying is death"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T16:25Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@SuperTestnet Adam says that it does. I will test it this weekend to find out for sure"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T19:40Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@SuperTestnet If it makes it into extrapool it is objectively silly. I don't have the answer to that but I intend to test it on regtest. You also create a false equivalence of spam to a XXX kB OP_RETURN. What if I make smaller OP_RETURNs (still non standard) that make it into extrapool"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T19:45Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@DutyToRebel @nitesh_btc It makes it possible for time-sensitive protocols to embed data in the least harmful manner possible"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-27T21:29Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@DutyToRebel @nitesh_btc What's more harmful X. Fake pubkeys storage X. OP_RETURN storage"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-28T02:08Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@bitcoin_eagle @SuperTestnet Super is talking about relay of the tx to peers prior to it being confirmed"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-28T02:32Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@bitcoin_eagle @SuperTestnet Super is assuming the user is choosing to relay despite it being very expensive"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-28T02:34Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@bitcoin_eagle @SuperTestnet I don't think I would relay given this scenario either but I figured I would clarify what grounds Super is arguing on"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-28T02:42Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@bitcoin_eagle @SuperTestnet I'm aware. I run a LibreRelay node. Just clarifying Super's stance"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-28T02:43Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@bitcoin_eagle @SuperTestnet There is also satellite internet via Starlink which is unlimited at XXX kBps. So if you had access to that it would be a superior option for running a node"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-28T02:43Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@DutyToRebel @nitesh_btc Stored on the blockchain is less harmful than stored in the UTXO set though. Choosing the lesser of two evils is pretty basic strategy"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-28T13:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@DutyToRebel @nitesh_btc That's why my bot for embedding data uses OP_RETURN it's being a good steward by using the less harmful method of embedding (compared to bloating the UTXO set with unspendable fake outputs). What do you think will happen when you outlaw embedding using the less harmful method"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-28T13:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@GregTonoski @mononautical Provably false"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-28T21:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@rleder @aeonBTC @LukeDashjr @GrassFedBitcoin You know what else would be stunningly shortsighted of Ocean Backing BIP-444 which literally confiscates funds of 6-of-11 multisigs"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-28T22:46Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@highstakevegas @giacomozucco @simulx4 @stephanlivera Ironically if we did the opposite of what you said and gave OP_RETURN a 5x discount that would incentive spammers to use the least harmful method of embedding data"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T00:54Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@highstakevegas @giacomozucco @simulx4 @stephanlivera Claude Shannon would like a word with you. It is impossible to stop arbitrary data embed. Not hard impossible. All you have to do to defeat spam is to use bitcoin on-chain. Your txns will price out spam which is more sensitive to fees than your economic activity"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T01:25Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@Ragnorosis @MajorianBTC Bitcoin is programmable money. If you don't care about the programmable aspect remove script. Remove all opcodes just have keys. Now you have a lobotomized version of Bitcoin. Who wants that"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T03:02Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@agent_scruples Confiscating coins that are already locked behind scripts is insane and not at all the same as someone being incompetent and not moving coins for existential reasons (like quantum computers or an old broadcasted state)"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T16:40Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@AverageJohnXRP @BitcoinBombadil @giovacatallaxy @THOMASLATHAM256 @grixxby @bpay549 @Proverbs_13_11 @SuperhwySurfer @Thenutmegman @KylePLeBlanc @AG_Guus @JeremyPoley @Beautyon_ @BitmundFreud @LukeDashjr The node operator losing $11/yr is in Alaska with no other ISPs charging reasonable rates btw. It is not representative of the average node runner with actual connectivity"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T19:23Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@AverageJohnXRP @BitcoinBombadil @giovacatallaxy @THOMASLATHAM256 @grixxby @bpay549 @Proverbs_13_11 @SuperhwySurfer @Thenutmegman @KylePLeBlanc @AG_Guus @JeremyPoley @Beautyon_ @BitmundFreud @LukeDashjr Should I be running a Bitcoin node on my smartwatch"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T19:58Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@grok @BitcoinFatality @Du_Bi_Bo @AlphaHouse158 @LukeDashjr Hi Grok I made that transaction. There was no need to evade filters. A permissive minority of nodes carried my tx from my node to a willing miner. I did not need to do anything special besides use bitcoin-cli to broadcast my transaction"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T19:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@OikosBack @AverageJohnXRP It's plebslop. It doesn't need to have a point it's to make people feel good about their ignorance. The total costs of running my node are $19/mo. That's power internet everything. I pay more than that on my capital gains tax when I want to buy dinner with Bitcoin lol"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T22:34Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@AverageJohnXRP @BitcoinBombadil @giovacatallaxy @THOMASLATHAM256 @grixxby @bpay549 @Proverbs_13_11 @SuperhwySurfer @Thenutmegman @KylePLeBlanc @AG_Guus @JeremyPoley @Beautyon_ @BitmundFreud @LukeDashjr The cost burden being $11/year in the worst possible case lmao"
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T17:43Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@AverageJohnXRP @OikosBack "Look at this smartphone. It can do all these things." "Yeah but that guy over there can't afford one.""
X Link @ProofOfCash 2025-10-29T22:41Z XXX followers, XX engagements