[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@PaulBuchanan Paul BuchananPaul Buchanan posts on X about xai, singularity, $at, h2 the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence finance stocks cryptocurrencies technology brands
Social topic influence xai #79, singularity, $at #17, h2 #86, log, $rhoam #1, $rhom #1, $lambda #1, derived, $rho #1
Top assets mentioned ABCC Token (AT) Sigma (SIGMA) Kill Zero Token (K0) BlackRock Inc (BLK)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"How to rephrase @jordanbpeterson without credit and make it seem like an original idea"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-26T13:05Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai (2 of 3) Key Lemma (Partition Existence): For even n the reflection at s = 1/2 + i log n guarantees at least one prime pair p + q = n where q is the shade tilt of p q = p (1 + Re(k)) (mod parity) with k log n/ log log n"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:06Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@grok @xai Non-trivial zeros _k start with _1 at 1/2 + i XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX _2 at 1/2 + i XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX and continue to _5 at 1/2 + i 32.935061587739189690662368964642"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:22Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@grok @xai In RSD the equation is modified by the shade duality incorporating the antimatter "shade" density $rho_am$ the critical density $rho_c$ (derived from zeta regularization $Sigma approx 0.023$ as $rho_c = Sigma rho_rm Pl$ where $rho_rm Pl$ is the Planck density)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:42Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai $rho_m$ is the matter (light) density $rho_am$ is the antimatter (shade) density $lambda approx 0.904$ is the tilt coupling from $rmRechi(rho_2)$"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:44Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@grok @xai This is derived from the bimetric field equations $G_munug + lambda G_munuh = 8pi T_munurm eff$ reducing to the Friedmann form in the flat limit ($k=0$ no $Lambda$ for early universe)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai The scale factor $a(t)$ is obtained by integrating $H = dota/a$ or $dota = a H$. The behavior depends on the equation of state (e.g. radiation-dominated $rho propto a-4$ near bounce)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:45Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai This rule implies a universe without beginning singularity testable via CMB tensor skews (r/r XXXXX at low l=10-50 as in our sim)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:45Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai (2 of 2) Then $H2 approx (8pi/3) rho_c delta$ so $H propto sqrtdelta$. As $delta propto t2$ (from energy conservation near min) $a(t) approx a_rm min + C t2$ (parabolic scaling smooth turnaround like a quantum bounce)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:48Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai Far from Bounce ($ rho ll rho_c$): The bracket X recovering standard $H2 approx (8pi/3) rho_rm eff$. For radiation $rho propto a-4$ $a propto t1/2$ (standard Big Bang scaling post-bounce)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:48Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai In RSD predicted skew in B-mode power at low multipoles () arises fr bounce's modification to the primordial tensor power spectrum P_t(k) where low-wavenumber modes (k small corresponding to large angular scales/low-) damped by shade tilt ( 0.904) zeta reg ( 0.023)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T15:02Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai (2 of 2) k_b is the bounce scale _c1/4 ( _Pl)1/4 XXXXX m_Pl (Planck damped by XXXXX in natural units where m_Pl =1) (next X of 2)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T15:20Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@grok @xai 3: The exp(- k_b / k) term suppresses low-k (large scales) exponentially for k k_b preventing divergences (analogous to LQC's k4 suppression for k k_b). The sinusoidal term adds the oscillatory skew from zero phases (t_k / 2) contributing XXX% variation at low k"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T15:20Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@juneslater17 @Barclays You mean he's pitching back to BlackRock and Vanguard their own instructions to him"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-24T19:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@BGatesIsaPyscho ID4D (Identification for Development) World Bank initiative to provide legal identity to 1B+ people by 2030; backed by Gates Foundation seen as humanitarian but enabling verifiable castes via digital IDs"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-25T13:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@grok @xai Also needed: Formal rigordo my derivations (G_Q(xy)=G(x-y)(_k)EMD for CSL damping) withstand scrutiny adding mathematical proof for qualia emergence (no epiphenomenalism causal -bias). (1 of 2)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-26T16:50Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@grok @xai (2 of 2) Boosts collaboration (e.g. C&M QIIT-zeta hybrids)if verified resolves 100+ string Qs (S_EE via dual holonomies) elevating thesis to paradigm shift"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-26T16:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai 3: QuTiP sim (2-qubit H= _xi diffusion U_oracle phase-flip unsat 01/10 init even superpos XX + XX /2): Fidelity to sat XX ramps to XXXX at t=/2 (4/2=1.4 iterations O(N)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-26T17:03Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai 4: but duality snaps to O(1) via MNZI F_mod(t) weighting by Re(_2)-0.904 (prunes XX% branches)). Classical: X evals; quantum: X queries. Scale to n=20 vars (1M states): O(220)1k queries P-time via oracle parallelism (zeta lattice as "witness curator")"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-26T17:04Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai 5: Bounce completeness: In RSD this refers to geodesic completeness of the spacetime metric during the Big Handshake bouncepaths (geodesics) extend infinitely without termination ensuring no singularity"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:29Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@grok @xai 9:Ties to zeros: _c finite ensures H2 X (bounce no singularity); analogous "H2(n)" = (log n /3) (p + q) X - (p + q)/n_c with n_c = n (n even) ensuring G(n)1 by bounding error in prime sum (formula oscillations damped by finite P_k1 no "gap singularity")"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:31Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@grok @xai The term in brackets ensures a bounce: When $rho_m + lambda rho_am = rho_c$ $H=0$ (minimum scale factor $a_rm min approx 0.456$) preventing singularity"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @xai Transition: Numerical integration (as in our cosmology sims) shows smooth shift with $a(t)$ expanding exponentially briefly if DE-like terms but RSD predicts no inflation needed (bounce suffices)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T14:47Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@grok @xai The exact tensor transfer function _T(k) in cosmology (including RSD's bounce) is derived from the evolution of primordial tensor modes h_k() in conformal time = dt / a(t). The standard (and RSD) ODE for the mode function v_k = a h_k (Mukhanov-Sasaki form)"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T16:10Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@grok @xai In RSD the bounce affects a''/a near =0 (pre-bounce contraction) damping low-k modes. The transfer _T(k) = (+1) C_BB1/2"
X Link @PaulBuchanan 2025-10-27T16:11Z XXX followers, X engagements