[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Maryanne Demasi, PhD posts on X about eli lilly, money, approved, trust in the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence stocks XXX% finance XXXX%
Social topic influence eli lilly #83, money 1.45%, approved 1.45%, trust in XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @jikkyleaks @mdbreathe @newstart2024 @retsefl @kevin_mckernan @seckennedy @tonynikolic10 @belgiumjerry @thechiefnerd @charmsyahoo @kevinmckernan @jeffreyatucker @usfda @weldeiry @luijsterburglab @racing_away @johnclark5889 @klveritas @proftimnoakes @krugalli
Top assets mentioned Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"π¨The HPV vaccine A Scottish study was billed as proof the HPV vaccine can wipe out cervical cancer. But a new analysis of the raw data shows it was nothing more than a statistical illusion. LINK ππ @RetsefL @MdBreathe @Jikkyleaks @newstart_2024"
X Link @MaryanneDemasi 2025-10-05T22:52Z 60.6K followers, 102.5K engagements
"π¨The Nature of hypocrisy: pharma-funded journals smearing independent voices @Nature alleges that I endanger public health but it is the journal steeped in pharma money that ought to be looking inward. LINK ππ @RetsefL @RWMaloneMD @Jikkyleaks @TheChiefNerd @DowdEdward @weldeiry @SciGuardians @Kevin_McKernan @MdBreathe"
X Link @MaryanneDemasi 2025-10-01T12:26Z 60.6K followers, 151.9K engagements
"Conflict of interest at the heart of @Nature This journal that publishes vaccine research while pocketing revenue from pharmaceutical advertising and sponsored content from vaccine manufacturers. To then assign an editor to target independent journalists who scrutinise that very industry is a glaring conflict of interest. On its own website Nature boasts of partnerships with @JanssenUS @Merck @AstraZeneca and others dressing them up as pioneering collaborations to support science. It even publishes paid advertising features"
X Link @MaryanneDemasi 2025-10-01T12:26Z 60.6K followers, 5544 engagements
"FULL analysis"
X Link @MaryanneDemasi 2025-10-12T08:01Z 60.6K followers, 5783 engagements
"π©Peter Marks joins Eli Lilly proving the revolving door never stops turning Another ex-FDA official jumps into bed with Big Pharma. He dismissed safety concerns and promoted the products he approved proof that institutional corruption is rewarded not punished. LINK ππ @MdBreathe @Jikkyleaks @newstart_2024"
X Link @MaryanneDemasi 2025-10-08T12:07Z 60.6K followers, 20K engagements
"πThe DNA contamination problem just got bigger New preprint by @Kevin_McKernan reveals that DNA fragments in Pfizers Covid-19 vaccine carry bacterial signatures capable of supercharging inflammationevidence that residual DNA risks go far beyond genomic integration. LINK ππ @RetsefL @TracyBethHoeg @Jikkyleaks @newstart_2024"
X Link @MaryanneDemasi 2025-10-12T21:15Z 60.6K followers, 128.2K engagements
"The emails language was revealing. Phrases like scientific consensus and peer-reviewed science are waved around like trump cards but in practice they are red flags appeals to authority rather than evidence. Consensus can be manufactured. And peer review is no shield against corruption. I have documented journalpharma ties the retraction of inconvenient studies and the use of pharma-funded fact checks masquerading as science to discredit politically uncomfortable findings"
X Link @MaryanneDemasi 2025-10-01T12:26Z 60.6K followers, 2120 engagements
"π₯Pfizers XX% effective claim was bogus. PCR data showed almost no infections in the COVID vaccinated groupyet N-antibody data showed many infections in the same group. Both cant be true meaning the PCR results were likely manipulated to create the illusion of efficacy. LINK ππ @Jikkyleaks @MendenhallFirm @MdBreathe"
X Link @MaryanneDemasi 2025-10-12T08:01Z 60.6K followers, 82.5K engagements
"Marks move to Eli Lilly may be legal but its not ethical. He left behind a demoralised agency an injured public & a crisis of trust in federal health oversight. Those who once believed his assurances are now left wondering whose interests were really being served @RobertKennedyJr"
X Link @MaryanneDemasi 2025-10-08T12:07Z 60.6K followers, 2584 engagements