[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@BitcoinBombadil Avatar @BitcoinBombadil ₿itcoin ₿ombadil

₿itcoin ₿ombadil posts on X about bitcoin, money, spam, fiat the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #

Social category influence cryptocurrencies #3167 finance XXXX% automotive brands XXXX% stocks XXXX% exchanges XXXX% technology brands XXXX%

Social topic influence bitcoin #1067, money 7.37%, spam #119, fiat #517, all the 1.92%, proof of #171, ethereum 1.28%, devs #114, you dont 1.28%, filters XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @lukedashjr @adam3us @decentmoney2009 @21bitcoinmaxi @satflation @bitmexresearch @tomfuturist @raindogdance @excellion @jabulanijakes @nilskp @zamir591582 @tonevays @mirareserve @infinitej3st3r @ottobonjovi @nickszabo4 @styrianhodl @notgrubles @grassfedbitcoin

Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) Ethereum (ETH) Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) Bitcoin Cash (BCH) BlackRock Inc (BLK)

Top Social Posts #

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Every time someone dumps Spam like this on Bitcoin it gets harder to run a full node. Full nodes are required to self-custody and solo mine Bitcoin. Full node redundancy & decentralization are essential. Run Knots. Filters up.✊🏼🫡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-25T12:03Z 2040 followers, 34.2K engagements

"@OikosBack It would be even better if this noisy arbitrary data wasnt in Bitcoin at all. The idea is to maximize Bitcoins monetary signal to arbitrary noise ratio"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T09:40Z 2032 followers, XXX engagements

"Using Bitcoin as Money Abusing Bitcoin as an Arbitrary Data Dump for Spam The goal is to maximize Bitcoins monetary signal to arbitrary noise ratio to maximize its monetary quality. The goal is not unnecessary data storage"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T09:44Z 2031 followers, XXX engagements

"@TomFuturist @StyrianHodl Its even easier and cheaper to run a Bitcoin full node with less unnecessary data. Also Bitcoin has millions of users but only 20k full nodes we need to use best effort to make running a full node as user friendly as possible so more people run full nodes"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T10:18Z 2032 followers, XX engagements

"@The_Fast_One_ Theres a difference between using Bitcoin for its designed purpose (p2p electronic cash money) and using it as an arbitrary data dump for Spam. Using Bitcoin as Money is positive sum. Using Bitcoin for Spam is negative sum total waste and abuse"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T10:22Z 2031 followers, XXX engagements

"@TomFuturist @StyrianHodl Just because Bitcoin has always had a small number of full nodes doesnt justify having a small number of full nodes in the future. Full nodes are like Bitcoins Ozone Layer and Spam is like CFCs that deplete the Ozone Layer. We should use best effort to mitigate spam"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T11:06Z 2032 followers, XX engagements

"@TomFuturist @StyrianHodl In order to maximize the quality of Bitcoins signal we need to minimize arbitrary data noise with best effort. If we can maximize Bitcoins monetary signal to arbitrary noise ratio then we improve Bitcoins quality. Less spam - less full node bloat - higher quality Bitcoin"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T11:17Z 2032 followers, XX engagements

"The Spam on Bitcoin is the data you added to the chain that wasnt required to use Bitcoin as Money. And if you have to ask what that means then thats a red flag. 🚩 But if you know you Knots. Datacarrier = X Filters up.✊🏼"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T11:45Z 2034 followers, 1217 engagements

"@TomFuturist @StyrianHodl Economic sovereignty is a strong incentive. We need to do a better job marketing that incentive through high signal communication and education about Sound Money basic Econ principles and exposing the Fraud of the Parasitic Fiat Mind Virus"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T12:01Z 2032 followers, XX engagements

"@TomFuturist @StyrianHodl All things being equal we dont want to bloat Bitcoin full nodes with unnecessary data. Full node uptime is essential to maximizing system upside and resilience"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T12:17Z 2031 followers, XX engagements

"@lexbacker Tell me why we need more people to run Bitcoin full nodes withdraw to self custody and solo mine their own blocks to route around the central party bitches without telling me"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T12:20Z 2031 followers, XXX engagements

"It sure is a good thing a majority of the Bitcoin Network is still exercising sufficient vigilance. We have Team Knots Ocean DATUM and those who didnt downgrade to v.30 defaults to thank for that. I give no thanks to traitors like Grubles"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T12:45Z 2031 followers, XXX engagements

"@pointonebtc Bitcoin mining nodes have been enforcing all kinds of soft and hard filters for over a decade. Its ridiculous to abandon that strategy. Bitcoins filters need to be configured to optimize for Bitcoins monetary purpose"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T12:54Z 2032 followers, XXX engagements

"Grubles is better suited for the sats vs. bits debate. Do knot look to Grubles for high quality Bitcoin signal on the Spam Filters debate"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T13:02Z 2032 followers, XX engagements

"@TomFuturist @StyrianHodl The incentive to secure your own wealth is strong but that signal is being suppressed with a lot of Fiat Noise right now. It takes time to reverse 100+ years of Fiat Brainwashing. Bitcoin has to be defended from the Arbitrary Fiat Noise trying to distort Bitcoins signal"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T13:34Z 2034 followers, XX engagements

"@TomFuturist @StyrianHodl All things being equal the more people securing their own wealth with their own full nodes the better"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T13:43Z 2031 followers, XX engagements

"@TomFuturist @StyrianHodl I know Bitcoin isnt perfect but what do you mean by Bitcoins architecture is flawed"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T13:51Z 2031 followers, XX engagements

"@TomFuturist @StyrianHodl No one should be paid to run a full node but you can run a business and earn revenue with your business to cover your full node costs. The optimum incentive alignment is running your own Bitcoin full node to secure own wealth via self-custody/solo mining"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T14:10Z 2031 followers, XX engagements

"@TomFuturist @StyrianHodl You have to sell a service on top of the full node rail. Just like Id guess the internet service provider sells internet services on top of its internet server rails. No one is stopping you from running a business with a Bitcoin Full Node"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T14:41Z 2031 followers, XX engagements

"@heavysided @meygavox @Owll_D @BitcoinWifey @GrassFedBitcoin @LuganoPlanB unnecessary data makes it harder to run full nodes which makes it harder to resist censorship and use Bitcoin without permission. Youve got your priorities mixed up. Dont put the cart before the horse"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T15:21Z 2034 followers, XX engagements

"@thetigersvessel @pointonebtc Libre relay relies on Bitcoin miners who are either ignorant or bad actors to mine the Spam for them. XXXX% of Op_Returns are less than XX bytes because we cooperated on the Op_Return limit similar cooperation on Inscriptions could have had similar effectiveness"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T15:25Z 2034 followers, XX engagements

"All things being equal Bitcoin is better with less unnecessary data. Thats all the motivation we need. Someone should add that to the BIP. But legal risks are still real and shouldnt be dismissed inviting more risk of attack from the Fiat Legal System is not wise"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T15:36Z 2034 followers, XXX engagements

"@bamskki @Owll_D I chose Bitcoin because its Sound Money that helps defend my wealth from Dollar debasement. Bitcoin and its users arent perfect so we need to defend its quality with best effort. We made a lot of questionable changes to Bitcoin already and some course correction is needed"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T18:11Z 2034 followers, XX engagements

"Were trying to defend Bitcoins quality from Spam Attacks and people are getting their panties up in a bunch about how the BIP numbers get assigned"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T18:25Z 2034 followers, XXX engagements

"Just because demand for Bitcoin block space is low doesnt mean you should actively try to fill blocks with unnecessary data to earn extra fees. It means you should consider raising the minimum fee on your block template and build smaller blocks. Run Knots. Filters up.✊🏼🫡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T19:00Z 2034 followers, XXX engagements

"How does a XXX byte limit for Op_Return make Bitcoin better Money"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T19:07Z 2035 followers, XXX engagements

"@jake__youngman I disagree. But also seems pretty clear he needs (wants*) a higher Op_Return limit for something. Normalizing more unnecessary data on Bitcoin via higher Op_Return limits (either through policy or consensus) is wrong. We need to mitigate Spam not facilitate it even more"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T20:38Z 2035 followers, XXX engagements

"The ones trying to mitigate Spam on Bitcoin arent serious but the ones trying to facilitate Spam are very serious.🤡🌎"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T20:52Z 2032 followers, XXX engagements

"@adam3us @jake__youngman Can you explain how these Layer2 anchors youre referring to help make Bitcoin better Money Lightning is a protocol that creates a perfect/near perfect Money Substitute for Bitcoin that facilitates off chain payments. What is the purpose/end goal of these other L2s"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T21:40Z 2035 followers, XXX engagements

"@adam3us @jake__youngman That doesnt explain the purpose or end goal of BitVM. But from what Ive read BitVM wants to add more Ethereum functionality to Bitcoin and that sounds like a Pandoras Box of bullshit to me"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T22:42Z 2035 followers, XXX engagements

"@decentmoney2009 @nakadai_mon @peterktodd More Spam makes it harder to run a full node. Less spam makes it easier to run a full node. The practical benefits of less spam on Bitcoin are obvious. Plus you dont have to run Knots to run Lukes Ord Disrespecter and set Datacarrier = X on Core v.27 afaik"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T23:03Z 2035 followers, XX engagements

"How do supersized Op_Returns and miniscript make Bitcoin better money What % of Bitcoin users use Op_Return or miniscript If we keep catering to the degenerate minority in Bitcoin were gonna have a bad time"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T09:34Z 2032 followers, XXX engagements

"@RC_Free_D No idea on that but regardless Liveras arguments are a disgrace. I dont want to dismiss legal risks but I dont want to get myopic about them either. The Economic and Ethos Creep risks of unnecessary data on Bitcoin are enough to oppose more increases to Op_Return limits"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T11:18Z 2032 followers, XX engagements

"@Rob1Ham How does using Miniscript make Bitcoin better Money Ive never used it. How does unnecessary data stuffed in Op_Return and Inscription envelopes make Bitcoin better money Ive never used Op_Return or Inscriptions. Have you"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T11:34Z 2032 followers, XX engagements

"@decentmoney2009 This isnt about Luke this is about using best effort to mitigate obviously harmful unnecessary data on Bitcoin. Your Luke Derangement Syndrome is palpable and its obviously clouding your judgement"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T14:13Z 2031 followers, XX engagements

"@stack2thefuture @LukeDashjr Better to be vigilant and conservative than grossly negligent. Legal risks aside facilitating more unnecessary data on Bitcoin opens the Network up to serious potential economic technical ethical & reputational risks. We need to use best effort to mitigate unnecessary data"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T17:53Z 2032 followers, XX engagements

"@HodlDee Mitigation XXX% Prevention XXXX% of Op_Returns are less than XX bytes because we cooperated on policy on an XX byte limit not by accident. Dont make perfection the enemy of using best effort to mitigate Spam"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T00:25Z 2035 followers, XX engagements

"@vazertuche @LukeDashjr @GrassFedBitcoin @mattkratter @Beautyon_ @jimmysong @NickSzabo4 How does this solve the price distortion problem that Spam creates on Bitcoin Storing the Spam/Evil content is a problem. But we also need to maximize the Monetary Fee Signal to Arbitrary Fee Noise ratio Price signaling is fundamental to Bitcoin and cant be overlooked"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T14:34Z 2034 followers, XX engagements

"@coryklippsten @LukeDashjr BitVM openly states in one of their white papers that they want to add more Ethereum functionality to Bitcoin. Thats a 🚩to most Bitcoin users. I have not heard any good a priori reasoning as to how BitVM obviously benefits Bitcoins Monetary Mission"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T18:18Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"But pretending theres no bug in Taproot is not unhinged But trying to increase the Op_Return limit isnt unhinged How many coins are affected by this Should we let Spammers hold the entire Bitcoin Network hostage over this Thoughts and feedback welcome"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T15:32Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"@TheBlueMatt But pretending theres no bug in Taproot is not unhinged But trying to increase the Op_Return limit isnt unhinged How many coins are affected by this Should we let Spammers hold the entire Bitcoin Network hostage over this Thoughts and feedback welcome"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T15:32Z 2040 followers, 3554 engagements

"Also some quick screening questions What is your position on the Bitcoin debate around Op_Return and Spam Do you support Lukes Inscription Filters Or are you one of these interloping Spam Apologists"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-20T00:03Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"@decentmoney2009 @venorusprime @notgrubles @Gjkvdyj @NickSzabo4 @highstakevegas @LukeDashjr @CagedSings @GrassFedBitcoin @pete_rizzo_ Just because we cant guarantee XXX% prevention of Spam doesnt mean we should surrender and actively facilitate Spam by normalizing Super Sized Op_Returns. We use best effort to mitigate Spam. Always have always will"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-23T12:25Z 2037 followers, 4087 engagements

"Spider Pool is attacking Bitcoin full nodes by bloating them with Spam data like below. If you care about maximizing Bitcoins viability then point your hash at Ocean using DATUM. Filters up"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-25T09:57Z 2036 followers, 9794 engagements

"There is too much complacency among Bitcoin users. If we hold Bitcoin to low degenerate standards it will never reach its full potential. If we want to usher in a real Bitcoin Standard for the global economy then we need to hold Bitcoin to the highest standards possible"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T10:53Z 2036 followers, XXX engagements

"@BitMEXResearch @brian_trollz Facilitating more ways to weigh Bitcoin down with unnecessary data is not The Way. SegWit & Taproot increased vulnerabilities that Core ignored. Regardless of legal risks we need to defend Bitcoin from unnecessary data"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T21:21Z 2037 followers, 4170 engagements

"@elkrun21 @adam3us @jake__youngman Right and what about potential for negative abuse Turing Complete Smart Contracts reminds me of the Fiat minded bullshit lending/yield chasing stuff on Ethereum along with users getting rug pulled & losing their money from buggy software"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T22:08Z 2036 followers, XX engagements

"@decentmoney2009 @nakadai_mon @peterktodd This is not a road Bitcoin has been down before. Super sized Op_Returns have never been standard on Bitcoin. If every node & block template raised their Op_Return limit to 100kb tomorrow seems likely the relay network would be inundated with unnecessary data. Hold the line"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T23:43Z 2036 followers, XXX engagements

"@decentmoney2009 @nakadai_mon @peterktodd And i disagree that its a marginal benefit we can see how much unnecessary data was added with the Inscription attack in 2023 It would be materially easier to run a full node without all that Spam bloat on Bitcoin"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T23:46Z 2036 followers, XXX engagements

"@2FreeTheMoney @adam3us @jake__youngman All Bitcoin users should patch the Inscription Bug in Taproot and hold the line in the 0-42 byte range on Op_Return at the Policy Level until further notice. Thats what every responsible node runner and block template creator should do until further notice afaict"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-26T23:58Z 2036 followers, XX engagements

"How you responded to the 2023 Inscription attack is probably a good indicator of where you stand on the current controversy around Op_Return limits"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T00:25Z 2036 followers, XXX engagements

"Bitcoin at this time seems to be stuck in the 14-18-karat block quality range when it could be minting extremely high quality Bitcoin blocks closer to 24-karat if block template builders and miners simply mined smaller blocks with Datacarrier = X on Knots with Ocean + DATUM"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T00:36Z 2036 followers, XXX engagements

"Mitigate Stop Mitigate XXX% Prevention XXXX% of Op_Returns were less than XX bytes. The Op_Return filter limit at XX bytes did its job fine although I recommend Datacarrier =0. Filters work well when Bitcoin users cooperate on the policy level. Accept it"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T00:44Z 2036 followers, XXX engagements

"Jumping the shark is neglecting Inscription filters for 2+ years and then trying to standardize super sized Op_Returns on Bitcoin and somehow thinking that unnecessary data on Bitcoin isnt harmful to full nodes Bitcoins qualify as Money"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T03:06Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"If we dont normalize super sized Op_Returns on Bitcoin then Bitcoin will never have the same functionality as Ethereum -Shibobi and the Shitcoiners trying to ruin Bitcoin"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T09:41Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"The difference between the Pro-Filter and Anti-Filter side is that the Pro-Filter side believes in using vigilance and best effort to defend Bitcoin. The Anti-Filter side believes in complacency and excessive tolerance of degenerate waste and abuse of Bitcoin"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T09:44Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Stephan: What if the Devs get the filters wrong Me: Then we fix the filters with best effort now what if the Devs introduce a vulnerability in Taproot then pretend it doesnt exist for 2+ years then they try to normalize Super Sized Op_Returns on Bitcoin for no good reason"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T09:47Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Pretending the Taproot Bug doesnt exist for 2+ years and then moving to normalize 100000 byte Op_Returns wasnt on my Bitcoin Bingo Card either. But here we are. Unnecessary data is a risk to Bitcoin. What are we going to do about it Vigilance or complacence Which way"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T10:47Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Warning about possible consequences threatening legal action. The Anti-Spam side of Bitcoin has warned about economic ethical technical reputational and legal risks related 100kb Op_Returns for months. So Core accuses Anti-Spammers of threatening legal action. 🤡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T10:52Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Remember when Core Devs neglected Inscription filters to patch the Taproot Bug for 2+ years then tried to normalize 100kb Op_Returns on Bitcoin then acted like a victim when people called bullshit"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T11:04Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"@decentmoney2009 You deflect from Cores bad faith deception changing Datacarrier definitions and horrendous Bitcoin defense strategies and distract with Luke Derangement Syndrome. PortlandHODL and RobHam and Shinobi laugh about DDOSing Knots nodes do you criticize them"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T11:27Z 2038 followers, XX engagements

"Vigilance and defending the Network from obviously harmful unnecessary data is a winning strategy for Bitcoin. Complacence is a losing strategy for Bitcoin. Set Datacarrier = X Filters up"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T11:41Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Bitcoin is Money. Consensus rules and policy standards should be configured to optimize Bitcoins monetary quality"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T11:44Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Tell me youre fine with attackers bloating Bitcoin with Spam and making it harder to run full nodes without telling me. Unnecessary data on Bitcoin is a negative economic externality on the entire Network"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T12:23Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"@decentmoney2009 Your complacency says otherwise. But glad you havent downgraded to V.30. Hope you patch your Core v.27 node with Lukes Ord Disrespecter soon. We should cooperate in order to mitigate Spam and help maximize Bitcoins quality"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T12:25Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"Ive been highlighting potential negative externalities from economic technical and ethical risks of Super Sized Op_Returns on Bitcoin for months. Legal risk is just one more risk to add to the pile. But economic risks alone are enough to call bullshit on Core v.30 defaults"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T12:34Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Does Rob really not know that BSV normalized supersized Op_Returns and their network was soon flooded with CSAM content Its a well documented story. Facilitating more unnecessary data will on taint Bitcoin even more. We should mitigate unnecessary data with best effort"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T12:38Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Ok put moral and legal risks aside for a second even though they are real risks. Less unnecessary data on Bitcoin is better for Bitcoin full nodes because it means less bloat. The negative economic externalities of Spam on Bitcoin are obvious"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T12:44Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"@graveskies @MajorianBTC All things being equal less unnecessary data on Bitcoin makes Bitcoin more user friendly and better overall"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T13:19Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"Weve tried to mitigate Spam/DOS attacks with best effort since Bitcoins earliest days. We have to keep using best effort to mitigate as much unnecessary data as possible. Facilitating more unnecessary data with 100kb Op_Returns is not The Way"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T13:39Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Less unnecessary data on Bitcoin is better for Bitcoin. Thats just a fact"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T13:49Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"Unnecessary data added to Bitcoin puts unnecessary burden on every Bitcoin Full Node. We should use best effort to mitigate unnecessary data from harming Bitcoin full nodes. Full nodes are essential for self-custody and solo mining. Defend the nodes. Wake up Master Gandalf"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T14:18Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"@maxipleb And weve been trying to mitigate that unnecessary data on Bitcoin since the earliest days. Satoshi saw that people could attack Bitcoin with DOS attacks and so Satoshi implemented the 1MB block limit because Satoshi knew they shouldnt do that"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T15:09Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"If the data is not objectively necessary to using Bitcoin as Money then its Spam and its harmful and we should use best effort to mitigate it. Its really not hard to understand"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T23:27Z 2038 followers, XXX engagements

"@StackingPlsWait @decentmoney2009 We need to stop rocking the fuckin Boat and fix the Inscription filters ASAP. And definitely stop increasing Op_Return limits. Weve come too far for Bitcoin users and devs to surrender to Spam and stop using best effort to cooperate"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T01:54Z 2036 followers, XX engagements

"No lies detected. Bitcoin is Money. If you know you Knots. Filters up. ✊🏼🫡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T02:00Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"@StackingPlsWait @decentmoney2009 This is the time to move over the 24-Karat Golden Bridge to the Bitcoin Motte built on top of Sound Common Sense Filters Knots Ocean DATUM and Full Node Running Solo Mining Mavericks"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T02:04Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"@BitcoinFatality Fee is a filter. Block size is a filter. XX byte limit on Op_Return is a filter. Proof of work is a filter. Taproot Bug needs Inscription filters. Bitcoin is filters all the way down. And dont worry about how long Ive been here everyone is learning at their own pace"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T02:44Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"@BitcoinFatality Im rubber and youre glue.🤣 Bitcoin is Filters all the way down so we filter up to defend Bitcoins quality. Filter up or GTFO & migrate over to Fiat Shitcoin World. If you know you Knots. I think youve had enough"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T02:51Z 2036 followers, XX engagements

"Pretending Spam doesnt harm Bitcoin is whats insane Master Gandalf"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T10:10Z 2036 followers, XXX engagements

"Data that is unnecessary to achieving Bitcoins Monetary Purpose can gradually or suddenly pull Bitcoin out of its Goldilocks Money Zone where Bitcoin has the highest chance of survival & flourishing. Non-money use of Bitcoin is not The Way"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T11:21Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Clear and honest signals are required to solve the Byzantine Generals Problem. When people in Bitcoin arent sending clear and honest signals to each other on the social layer then that starts to manifest in the technical layer"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T11:24Z 2038 followers, XX engagements

"I care if your Bitcoin Full Node or Block Template is facilitating more Spam Bloat that adds unnecessary cost & burden to my full node. If too many Bitcoin users decide to be assholes were gonna have a bad time. The Filters help mitigate the Bitcoin users (abusers) who suck"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T12:01Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"@TomFuturist Afaict we need lean & mean full nodes on Bitcoin L1 to optimize Lightning. Afaik the only way to use Lightning in a self-sovereign manner without permission is with your own full node. Pushing monetary txs to Lightning and bloating the base layer with Spam is not wise"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T12:21Z 2037 followers, X engagements

"Afaict we need lean & mean full nodes on Bitcoin L1 to optimize Lightning. Afaik the only way to use Lightning in a self-sovereign manner without permission is with your own full node. Pushing monetary txs to Lightning and bloating the base layer with Spam is not wise"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T12:22Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"No the Bitcoin is Money people are using best effort to maximize Bitcoins Monetary Signal to Arbitrary Noise ratio and maximize Bitcoins monetary quality. The ignorant or malicious people want to degrade Bitcoins monetary quality with harmful unnecessary data"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T13:50Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"2+ years of Bitcoin surviving traitors like Grubles here"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T14:09Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"How does this solve the price distortion problem that Spam creates on Bitcoin"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T14:25Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"@vazertuche @LukeDashjr @GrassFedBitcoin @mattkratter @Beautyon_ @jimmysong @NickSzabo4 Fees alone arent good enough we can do better than just relying on Fees. Fees alone dont maximize Monetary Signal to Arbitrary Noise ratio Proactive Relay Filtering + Bitcoin Users Calling Bullshit on Social Layer + Fees Fees The price of Bitcoin is Eternal Vigilance"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T16:53Z 2038 followers, XX engagements

"@adam3us @Excellion @NickSzabo4 @satflation @jabulanijakes @BitMEXResearch More and more Bitcoin users say bigger than X bytes or XX bytes for Op_Return is a weak argument. If XXX bytes makes Bitcoin better money then show us how it does so. Negotiating with Spam Terrorists is the true mal-incentive & moral hazard"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-19T10:58Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Facilitating more unnecessary data on Bitcoin is bad for Bitcoin Full Nodes"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T14:55Z 2038 followers, XXX engagements

"All unnecessary data on Bitcoin poses threats and risks to Bitcoin and its users. Spam bloat on full nodes makes it harder for users to self-custody and solo mine Bitcoin. If you dont understand that by now then youre just being willfully ignorant or youre malicious"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T16:00Z 2036 followers, XXX engagements

"@BTCGandalf This is not the same thing as stuffing unnecessary data in Op_False Op_If and Op_Return envelopes. AFAIK Satoshi designed scriptsig field of the Coinbase tx in every block to allow for random data today Miners use it to self-identify"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T16:18Z 2036 followers, XXX engagements

"Data in the Script sig field in coinbase tx of a block Spam Bitcoin users need to do their homework to understand why"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T19:08Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Show me where the legal threats hurt you. 🤡🤣 Imagine arguing that adversarial thinking about defending Bitcoin from Spam/CSAM attacks hurts Bitcoin more than the actual attack. Vigilance Negligence"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T19:53Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"Spam Apologists: Stop bullying and threatening us with your adversarial thinking vigilance and Bitcoin soft fork proposals Me:"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T20:17Z 2036 followers, XX engagements

"@graveskies @MajorianBTC No the unnecessary data weighing down the Bitcoin blockchain and full nodes with unnecessary cost and burden is objective"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T21:29Z 2038 followers, XX engagements

"@BitcoinFatality Whats ironic is Bitcoin Cash raised their Op_Return limit to XXX bytes. Meanwhile Luke and the rest of the Pro-Filter people dont want to raise the Op_Return limit but the Core Simps want to raise it to 100000 bytes way more than Bcash"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T02:38Z 2039 followers, XXX engagements

"The appeal to Fiat Legal Risks got louder only after the Spam Apologists and Core Maintainers ignored the Economic Technical Ethical and Reputational risks of Spam/Unnecessary Data on Bitcoin for 2+ years then launched & ran Core v.30 despite loud protest. And here we are"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T13:12Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"If your take away from the Bitcoin Spam War is that CSAM on Bitcoin is not ok but Christmas Tree JPEGs on Bitcoin are ok then you still have a lot of homework to do specifically in the realm of economics price signal optimization the nature of Money etc"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T14:46Z 2038 followers, XX engagements

"Does Bitcoin Gandalf set his Op_Return limit to X XX XX or 100000 bytes Does Bitcoin Gandalf run @LukeDashjrs Inscription Filters or not I recommend running Lukes inscription filters and setting Datacarrier = X. BlackRock should follow suit"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T15:21Z 2038 followers, XXX engagements

"When you cut through all the bullshit it is clear that the Spirit and Purpose of the Pro-Filter Soft Fork/BIP444 is to defend Bitcoins Monetary Nature from hostile Fiat Forces. I understand there may be technical wrinkles to iron out but lets affirm the Monetary Mission"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T17:21Z 2037 followers, XXX engagements

"The best way to not lose face is to course correct. Sound Money is Bitcoins North Star. Lets get our priorities straight. Bitcoin development and maintenance needs to be in service of maximizing Bitcoins quality as Money. Filters up. ✊🏼🫡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T17:40Z 2036 followers, XX engagements

"@coryklippsten @LukeDashjr Why does Bitcoin need to have Turing Complete expressiveness for arbitrary program execution on Bitcoin You dont have to read far into these BitVM White Papers for the red flags to trigger"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T18:20Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"@coryklippsten @LukeDashjr On policy or consensus level Also more people need to seriously vet BitVM as a concept. The White Papers are dense af. Have you tried reading them Tons of technobabble. Theyre not as readable as The Bitcoin White Paper. Is BitVM a way for Parasites to latch on Bitcoin"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T18:38Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"If youre offended by Luke the Liar Slayer and his 10th Man Mentality you should know hes been calling bullshit on the Mission Creep towards Arbitrary Data for years now. He is focusing on worst case scenarios to wake you the F up before you sleepwalk off a cliff"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T19:07Z 2038 followers, XXX engagements

"@SuperTestnet Thanks. That is more readable youre right. But my questions and concerns still stand when I read this: BitVM: Compute Anything on Bitcoin Potential applications include games like Chess Go or Poker and particularly verification of validity proofs in Bitcoin contracts"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T19:51Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"@SuperTestnet How does being able to compute anything on Bitcoin make Bitcoin better Money Lightning Payments as a Money Substitute on top of Bitcoin makes some sense. But why do we need an L2 for Chess Go and Poker on Bitcoin How do the pieces fit together"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T20:00Z 2038 followers, XX engagements

"@SuperhwySurfer @SuperTestnet Does Go Chess or Poker even need to be on upper layers of the Bitcoin monetary network though Why do we need this arbitrary program on top of or adjacent to Bitcoin or Lightning Bitcoin is Money. Lightning is a Money Substitute. BitVM is arbitrary program execution"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T21:46Z 2036 followers, XX engagements

"@SuperhwySurfer @SuperTestnet Not sure how or why BitVM is needed for that tho"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T21:57Z 2036 followers, XX engagements

"16+ years of Bitcoin still sufficiently secure thanks to the good faith best effort of honest nodes (users)"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T13:13Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"@BitcoinBricks10 @BTCGandalf I said 2+ years but youre right. I should have been more specific and said Spam has been a threat and a problem to Bitcoin for its entire existence. And I should have said Bitcoin users have been cooperating to defend Bitcoin from Spam for its entire existence"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T14:08Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"@BTCGandalf Master Gandalf remember who you are. Dont go the way of Saruman of Many Colors. Bitcoin needs more Gandalfs not Sarumans"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T15:08Z 2037 followers, XX engagements

"Just because you paid for the plane ticket doesnt mean you should annoy all of the other passengers flight attendants and the pilots on the flight. Just because you paid for the block space doesnt mean you should bog down the entire Bitcoin Network with Arb Data"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T18:09Z 2040 followers, XX engagements

"According to Clark Moodys Dashboard all of Bitcoin Cores most recent versions ranging from v.28-30 only represent XX% of the top node versions. XX% of the Bitcoin node network is not interested in following Core down its most recent path"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T20:01Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"I have not heard a single good reason for anyone to raise their Op_Return limit one bit higher than XX bytes. I have many good reasons to recommend lowering the Bitcoin Op_Return limit and run @LukeDashjrs Inscription filters ASAP"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T18:02Z 2040 followers, 1163 engagements

"@SuperTestnet @SuperhwySurfer Why do we need arbitrary crap anchored to or adjacent to anything in the Bitcoin Lightning Network ecosystem Lightning reasonably complements Bitcoins monetary nature. How do Turing complete smart contracts complement the Bitcoin Lightning monetary ecosystem"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T22:06Z 2040 followers, XX engagements

"When the Pro-Filter anti Core v.30 side of the Bitcoin Network says that Spam adds burden to Bitcoin full nodes this is what we mean"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T13:51Z 2040 followers, 4250 engagements

"@BTCGandalf Why are you pretending Spam on Bitcoin isnt a problem Master Gandalf"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T16:10Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"@simulx4 Feel free to click on the link. What I saw looks like a pretty compelling reason to use common sense filters to protect my Bitcoin full node and cut down on unnecessary burden on the network fact checks welcome"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T17:25Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"@simulx4 Ok lol"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T17:34Z 2040 followers, XX engagements

"@simulx4 Why would you want to bog down your Bitcoin Full Node with extra data Do you hate yourself"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T17:36Z 2040 followers, XX engagements

"Just because it was always possible and Taproot just made it easier doesnt mean we should neglect the fact that its a problem Your argument is defeatist bullshit bitch energy Unnecessary data on Bitcoin is harmful to Bitcoin Full Nodes. Full stop. Filters up. ✊🏼🫡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T17:57Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"If your solo mining and your Bitcoin full node crashes because it's getting bombarded with unnecessary spam data on the P2P Relay Network. . then was it really worth getting an "accurate picture" of the garbage spam txs that spam attackers are putting in blocks"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T18:15Z 2040 followers, XX engagements

"@17410742 My "potato" node is better off by removing as much unnecessary burden as possible. Why do you assume everyone else has ample computing resources to handle this unnecessary spam burden on their Bitcoin full node"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T18:21Z 2040 followers, XX engagements

"@TheBlueMatt @melvincarvalho Incorrectly dismissing the legal risks of increasing space for Arbitrary Data like youre doing here doesnt justify dismissing the other obvious economic technical ethical and reputational risks to Bitcoin if we continue to surrender space to unnecessary/arbitrary data"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T20:30Z 2040 followers, XX engagements

"If we keep surrendering block space to people who attack Bitcoin with unnecessary data then were gonna have a bad time. Filters up. ✊🏼🫡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T20:32Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"Filecoin hasnt had any problems bro It didnt destroy BSV bro The only way for Bitcoin to kill the Shitcoins is to become the Shitcoins bro You gotta believe me bro Brooooooooo"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-21T12:34Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"A BIP does not cause irreparable harm to Bitcoin. You know what causes irreparable harm to Bitcoin Unnecessary data. Do not downgrade to Core v.30. Run Knots Datacarrier = X Filters up. ✊🏼🫡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T15:05Z 2040 followers, 4453 engagements

"Dude outright says a newly released BIP that still needs vetting and consensus from the Bitcoin community is worse than the outright fraud/negligence that characterized Core Maintainers/some other Devs response to the Taproot Bug. Unbelievable Daniel Brrr is a clown"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T23:02Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"Bitcoins relay filters block size filter proof of work filter XX million pre-determined supply cap filter and dynamic difficulty filter all enhance Bitcoins fee filter. Bitcoin is filters all the way down. If you know you Knots. Filters up. Hold. As one. ✊🏼"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T10:42Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"@BTCGandalf Spam has been a problem for 2+ years. Even if its Christmas Tree JPEGs unnecessary data adds technical & economic burden to full nodes. Core v.30 only makes the Spam problem worse. No good reason to raise Op_Return limits and keep neglecting Inscription filters"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T10:54Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"Why does Bitcoin need more programmability to make it better Money I find Citreas technobabble to be vague and unconvincing. If you know you Knots. Filters up.✊🏼🫡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T13:06Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"Shout out to @melvincarvalho for putting this together. Bitcoin users need to circle the wagons stay together and defend their own node and everyone elses node from Spam"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T14:09Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"@statusquont Afaik you can still run a Core node (ideally older version) with Datacarrier = X and Lukes Ord Disrespecter patch to address the Inscription Bug in Taproot. This is bigger than Knots. Every user should defend Bitcoin with best effort"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T18:32Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"@17410742 I've done my best to mitigate spam on Bitcoin. I don't spam Bitcoin with unnecessary bullshit. All things being equal it's better for all network participants to mitigate Spam with best effort. Study basic Econ XXX principles like Negative Externalities & Moral Hazard"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T18:37Z 2040 followers, XX engagements

"Bitcoin wont save anything if we make it too hard for people to run full nodes so they can verify self-custody and solo mine Bitcoin. If you know you Knots. Filters up.✊🏼🫡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T19:22Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"Considering this guy was a spammer of the legal system in multiple countries his thoughts here dont surprise me. 2013 Core: We are all Satoshi 2025 Core: We are all Faketoshi Bitcoin users need to cooperate and defend Bitcoin from SpamScammers. Run Knots + Ocean + DATUM"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T23:37Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"@ProofOfCash The hard block size limit is a kind of filter. Proof of work is a kind of filter. Fees are a kind of filter. XX byte Op_Return limit was a policy filter. Now there is a proposal to make it a hard limit. fuck the filters = fuck Bitcoin Bitcoin is filters all the way down"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-27T18:46Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"Do you want Bitcoin to continue its Mission to be Electronic P2P Cash Money Or do you want Bitcoin to become a Spammers Paradise I came to Bitcoin for the Money and Im staying for the Money. The Spammers can make like Vitalik in 2014 and GTFO"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T12:41Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"Then why do we need a block size limit Then why do we need proof of work from the Miners Why do we need dust filters Why do we need difficulty adjustment Why do we need XX million supply cap If fees are all that matter why have all these other constraints on Bitcoin"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T14:47Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"If fees are the only filter needed then why dont we just remove the Bitcoin block size limit and transition to Proof of Stake 🤡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T14:50Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements

"@ProofOfCash @AverageJohnXRP @giovacatallaxy @THOMASLATHAM256 @grixxby @bpay549 @Proverbs_13_11 @SuperhwySurfer @Thenutmegman @KylePLeBlanc @AG_Guus @JeremyPoley @Beautyon_ @BitmundFreud @LukeDashjr The goal is to maximize Bitcoins quality and perhaps the fiat cost isnt the only issue. If your node is getting overburdened by unnecessary data it might hamper your ability to solo mine or self custody. The monetary savings is nice too more money to save into Bitcoin"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T17:52Z 2040 followers, XX engagements

"@TradFidiGuy @TheBlueMatt Just because it was always possible doesnt mean we should neglect obvious attack surfaces especially when Taproot + Witness Discount made the Spam cheaper and easier. We should pro-actively filter to maximize Bitcoins signal to noise ratio. Stop being so defeatist"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T23:44Z 2040 followers, XX engagements

"Filtering is the right thing to do for your full node your miners the whole Bitcoin Network and the people in your life who depend on your wealth derived from Bitcoins monetary quality. Self-sabotage is not The Way. If you know you Knots. Filters up.✊🏼🫡"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-29T23:53Z 2040 followers, XX engagements

"Bitcoin full nodes can easily filter unnecessary data stuffed into Op code envelopes like Op_Return and Op_False Op_If. And more advanced steganography is worse for the Spammer afaict because: -its more expensive to the Spammer -its harder to mass weaponize -its more hidden"
X Link @BitcoinBombadil 2025-10-28T00:00Z 2040 followers, XXX engagements