[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
magamind23 posts on X about elements, charlie kirk, holders, directed the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence finance
Social topic influence elements, charlie kirk, holders, directed, money
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@Laiize1337 @nikkinix222 @JordanUhl Sure"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-15T22:05Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@fred_guttenberg President elects are not "regular" private citizen. They receive significant federal support security and resources during the transition period to prepare for the presidency"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-12T14:24Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@R3mus16 @DoseofReality55 @mehdirhasan Do you know what a visa holder is You think that someone on a tourist visa should be allowed to donate to political campaigns"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-15T16:25Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@thelizabetch @EricLeeAtty @ConsularActProj @grok In civil immigration proceedings the burden is lower and speech grounds like "endorsing terrorist activity" don't require Brandenburg's elements"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-15T13:34Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@1914history @wells0p @ScottMGreer what state did you choose to move to"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-13T19:31Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@thelizabetch @EricLeeAtty @ConsularActProj @grok The Brandenburg test will not be the primary determinant in deportation challenges. Courts rarely invoke it directly as seen in ongoing 2025 cases where challenges succeed on broader First Amendment overbreadth or retaliation grounds not incitement analysis"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-15T13:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@tyler_the_philo @romanhelmetguy @X No private company allows free speech ever"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-15T14:29Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@thelizabetch @EricLeeAtty @ConsularActProj @grok Civil deportations are administrative proceedings to remove non-citizens for violating civil immigration laws while criminal law prosecutes offenses with penalties like fines or imprisonment"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-15T13:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@thelizabetch @EricLeeAtty @ConsularActProj NO it really isn't. The U.S. government considers the September 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk a terrorist act. Praising such an act falls under the "endorse or espouse terrorist activity" provision in INA 212(a)(3)(B)(i)(VII) which makes a non-citizen inadmissible"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-15T12:09Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@thelizabetch @EricLeeAtty @ConsularActProj @grok praising a terrorist act can constitute a violation of a visa holder's status under U.S. immigration law rendering them inadmissible and deportable"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-15T13:55Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@thelizabetch @EricLeeAtty @ConsularActProj @grok Brandenburg which protects speech unless it is directed to inciting imminent lawless action and likely to produce such action primarily applies to criminal offenses and does not govern civil deportation proceedings for non-citizens"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-15T13:45Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@R3mus16 @DoseofReality55 @mehdirhasan SCOTUS has consistently ruled that political donations are a form of free speech protected by the 1A. Since its 1976 decision in Buckley v. Valeo the Court has found that spending money in political campaigns is a protected activity that enables political communication"
X Link @99thinkaboutit 2025-10-15T16:35Z XXX followers, XX engagements