[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@0xJakobDeFi Avatar @0xJakobDeFi 0xJakobDeFi

0xJakobDeFi posts on X about gmx, holders, protocol, $565k the most. They currently have X followers and XX posts still getting attention that total X engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: X #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: X #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: X #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: undefined #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #


Social category influence cryptocurrencies exchanges finance technology brands

Social topic influence gmx #170, holders, protocol, $565k #1, hyperliquid #1220, avax, fatal, $42m, staking, earning

Top assets mentioned Chainlink (LINK) Ethereum (ETH)

Top Social Posts #


Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"A trader found the fatal flaw. Not in the code. In the design itself. The attack was simple: Open massive AVAX long on GMX (zero slippage = zero cost) Buy AVAX on Binance/Coinbase (push the price up) Close GMX position at instant profit Switch to short dump on CEXs profit again Repeat Over X hours. X cycles. $565000 extracted from GLP holders. The worst part No smart contract was exploited. GMX did exactly what it promised: zero price impact trading. That promise was killing it"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:05Z X followers, XX engagements

"A trader turned $565K profit in X hours by exploiting GMX. No smart contract was hacked. The protocol did exactly what it was built to do. Zero price impact was GMX's signature feature. It was also its biggest vulnerability. Here's what GMX's 4-year journey teaches about building in DeFi 🧵"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:04Z X followers, XX engagements

"GMX Survived Two Exploits. Your Capital Might Not. Sept 2022: $565K AVAX manipulation July 2025: $42M reentrancy exploit (funds returned) Providing liquidity or staking on GMX means more than earning yield. You're the counterparty to every leveraged trader. You're trusting anonymous devs. You're exposed to smart contract risk. The protocol survived. That doesn't mean your position will. This isn't FUD. This is what "being the house" actually means"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:05Z X followers, XX engagements

"While other protocols printed tokens for rewards GMX generated actual fees: Swap fees when traders entered/exited Borrowing fees (charged hourly on open positions) Liquidation fees when positions got wrecked The math was simple: If traders lost GLP holders won. If traders won GLP holders lost. This wasn't yield farming. This was skin in the game"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:05Z X followers, XX engagements

"V2 introduced what V1 couldn't have: Funding Rates: Long/short imbalance Dominant side pays fees to minority side Price Impact Fees: Large trades now move the price (slightly) XX Markets: Up from X original assets Chainlink Data Streams: Sub-second oracle updates The casino learned to manage risk"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:05Z X followers, XX engagements

"When Arbitrum Mainnet launched GMX launched with it. Same day. Same hour. Not coincidence. Conviction. Arbitrum offered sub-second finality low fees and Ethereum security. Perfect for leveraged trading where every millisecond matters. GMX bet on Layer X scaling. They were right"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:04Z X followers, XX engagements

"GMX bought back XXXX% of supply in XX months. They generate real revenue. 80+ protocols build on their liquidity. They're still #3 on Arbitrum by historical TVL. But Hyperliquid controls XX% of the perp DEX market now. GMX's peak volume: $706M (March 2024) GMX today: $198M They evolved. The market just evolved faster. Being a survivor doesn't mean being a winner. It means you get to fight another day"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:05Z X followers, XX engagements

"Elegant design isn't enough. Zero slippage almost killed them. Being first isn't enough. Hyperliquid proved that. Real revenue isn't enough. You need to stay competitive. What IS enough Adapting when your core feature becomes your biggest weakness. Launching V2 when everyone loved V1. Surviving exploits and market shifts. GMX is still here because they chose evolution over perfection"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:05Z X followers, XX engagements

"GMX's zero slippage wasn't a bug. It was their entire value proposition. Imagine a casino where the house could losebecause gambling was too fair. Now imagine telling your users: "We have to make it less fair to survive." The crossroads: Path 1: Keep zero slippage Traders stay happy Protocol bleeds to death Path 2: Add price impact Lose competitive edge But survive August X 2023: GMX V2 launched. They chose survival. The market didn't celebrate. TVL dropped. Volume fell. Competitors mocked. But they're still here"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:05Z X followers, XX engagements

"I break down DeFi protocols that adapted survived or died trying. GMX chose survival over perfection. Most protocols don't get that choice. Follow for more deep dives on what actually works in DeFi"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:05Z X followers, XX engagements

"V2 changed everything: Old Model (GLP): Single multi-asset pool All markets shared liquidity One risk = everyone's risk New Model (GM Pools): Isolated pools per market BTC/USD separate from ETH/USD Choose your risk exposure Example: Want only BTC/USDC risk Provide liquidity to that specific GM pool. No exposure to altcoin volatility"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:05Z X followers, XX engagements

"GMX V1 had one liquidity pool - GLP. Think of it as a casino where: Traders bet WITH leverage (up to 50x) GLP holders ARE the house XX% of all fees flow to the house Zero price impact = traders could move millions without slippage It was beautiful. Too beautiful"
X Link @0xJakobDeFi 2025-10-14T15:04Z X followers, XX engagements