[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] # $653m $653m sees massive engagement spike with creators up XXXXX% week-over-week. However, mentions are down XX% from the previous week, indicating a potential disconnect. ### About $653m $653m is a cryptocurrency project. ### Insights - $653m engagements hit 225.8K which is 2681% higher than it's daily average. - $653m creators is up XXXXX% from the previous week. - $653m engagements is up XXXXXX% from the previous month. - $653m mentions is up XX% from the previous week. - $653m posts created is up XX% from the previous week. ### Engagements: XXXXXXX (24h)  [Engagements 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data](/topic/$653m/time-series/interactions.tsv) Current Value: XXXXXXX Daily Average: XXXXX X Week: XXXXXXX +158% X Month: XXXXXXX +275% X Months: XXXXXXXXX +147% X Year: XXXXXXXXX +110% 1-Year High: XXXXXXX on 2025-09-04 1-Year Low: X on 2025-03-29 Engagements by network (24h): Reddit: X X: XXXXXXX ### Mentions: XX (24h)  [Mentions 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data](/topic/$653m/time-series/posts_active.tsv) Current Value: XX Daily Average: XX X Week: XX +50% X Month: XX -XX% X Months: XXX +67% X Year: XXX +154% 1-Year High: XXX on 2025-09-04 1-Year Low: X on 2025-03-29 Mentions by network (24h): Reddit: X X: XXX ### Creators: XX (24h)  [Creators 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data](/topic/$653m/time-series/contributors_active.tsv) XX unique social accounts have posts mentioning $653m in the last XX hours which is down XXXX% from XX in the previous XX hours Daily Average: XX X Week: XX +28% X Month: XX -XX% X Months: XXX +98% X Year: XXX +137% 1-Year High: XXX on 2025-09-04 1-Year Low: X on 2025-03-29 The most influential creators that mention $653m in the last XX hours | Creator | Rank | Followers | Posts | Engagements | | ------- | ---- | --------- | ----- | ----------- | | [@danrobinson](/creator/twitter/danrobinson) | X | XXXXXX | X | XXXXXX | | [@grok](/creator/twitter/grok) | X | XXXXXXXXX | X | XXX | [View More](/list/creators/$653m/100) ### Sentiment: XXX%  [Sentiment 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data](/topic/$653m/time-series/sentiment.tsv) Current Value: XXX% Daily Average: XX% X Week: XXX% no change X Month: XXX% +25% X Months: XXX% no change X Year: XXX% +10% 1-Year High: XXX% on 2024-12-13 1-Year Low: XX% on 2025-02-26 Most Supportive Themes: - Engagement Surge: (70%) The cryptocurrency project $653m has experienced an extraordinary surge in engagements, reaching 67.1K, which is XXX% higher than its daily average and a staggering 4425.95% increase from the previous week. - Creator Activity Increase: (20%) There has been a notable increase in active creators discussing $653m, with X unique social accounts posting in the last XX hours, a XX% rise from the previous day, indicating growing community interest. Most Critical Themes: - Declining Mentions: (10%) Despite high engagement, the number of mentions for $653m has decreased by XX% over the past week, suggesting a potential disconnect between general discussion and active engagement. ### Top $653m Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours *Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.* "Here is the forest as I see it: X. Your headline number is that traders lost $653m to cover a $23m deficit. That didn't make sense to me so I wondered if your interpretation of the data was mistaken. Happy to dig more into it when you open-source the analysis but if your model of queue-based ADL is that the top N positions all have their equity values zeroed out then I wonder if you might have made the same mistake in your data analysis and interpreted the equity value of the positions being closed as their losses (or something similar to that) * The paper says that Hyperliquid and Binance's" [X Link](https://x.com/danrobinson/status/1999025020140662890) [@danrobinson](/creator/x/danrobinson) 2025-12-11T07:54Z 80.2K followers, 10.2K engagements "As another large HYPE holder accused me yesterday: "show me the tweet/paper and I'll show you the bags" There are a few things here that are worth pointing out despite everyone FUDing not reading the paper and making conclusions based on the post (skill issue illiteracy)" [X Link](https://x.com/tarunchitra/status/1998985133303701673) [@tarunchitra](/creator/x/tarunchitra) 2025-12-11T05:16Z 78.2K followers, 166.4K engagements "This paper is simply wrong about its central topic: how Hyperliquids ADL works. Tarun is describing a different (much crazier) algorithm which also might explain how he calculated that traders somehow paid $653m to cover a $23m deficit. 🧵" [X Link](https://x.com/danrobinson/status/1998924691365572647) [@danrobinson](/creator/x/danrobinson) 2025-12-11T01:15Z 80.2K followers, 180.2K engagements "hard to understand how we got from a $23M deficit covered by ADL to "$653M lost" there are a lot of good points brought up by this research but the only fair way to present what happened on 10/10 on @HyperliquidX is that 23M was haircut from the profitable traders - the 834m of realized PnL of closed positions was not "lost" ADL for a participant trading on a single exchange is very likely to lower their risk. for most users *only trading* on hyperliquid on 10/10 ADL closed their shorts at the market bottom and by ranking ADL by most profitable positions you almost always going to overshoot" [X Link](https://x.com/moonshiesty/status/1998908492892004816) [@moonshiesty](/creator/x/moonshiesty) 2025-12-11T00:11Z 4505 followers, 1056 engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
$653m
$653m sees massive engagement spike with creators up XXXXX% week-over-week. However, mentions are down XX% from the previous week, indicating a potential disconnect.
About $653m
$653m is a cryptocurrency project.
Insights
- $653m engagements hit 225.8K which is 2681% higher than it's daily average.
- $653m creators is up XXXXX% from the previous week.
- $653m engagements is up XXXXXX% from the previous month.
- $653m mentions is up XX% from the previous week.
- $653m posts created is up XX% from the previous week.
Engagements: XXXXXXX (24h)
Engagements 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: XXXXXXX
Daily Average: XXXXX
X Week: XXXXXXX +158%
X Month: XXXXXXX +275%
X Months: XXXXXXXXX +147%
X Year: XXXXXXXXX +110%
1-Year High: XXXXXXX on 2025-09-04
1-Year Low: X on 2025-03-29
Engagements by network (24h): Reddit: X X: XXXXXXX
Mentions: XX (24h)
Mentions 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: XX
Daily Average: XX
X Week: XX +50%
X Month: XX -XX%
X Months: XXX +67%
X Year: XXX +154%
1-Year High: XXX on 2025-09-04
1-Year Low: X on 2025-03-29
Mentions by network (24h): Reddit: X X: XXX
Creators: XX (24h)
Creators 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
XX unique social accounts have posts mentioning $653m in the last XX hours which is down XXXX% from XX in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: XX
X Week: XX +28%
X Month: XX -XX%
X Months: XXX +98%
X Year: XXX +137%
1-Year High: XXX on 2025-09-04
1-Year Low: X on 2025-03-29
The most influential creators that mention $653m in the last XX hours
| Creator | Rank | Followers | Posts | Engagements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @danrobinson | X | XXXXXX | X | XXXXXX |
| @grok | X | XXXXXXXXX | X | XXX |
Sentiment: XXX%
Sentiment 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: XXX%
Daily Average: XX%
X Week: XXX% no change
X Month: XXX% +25%
X Months: XXX% no change
X Year: XXX% +10%
1-Year High: XXX% on 2024-12-13
1-Year Low: XX% on 2025-02-26
Most Supportive Themes:
- Engagement Surge: (70%) The cryptocurrency project $653m has experienced an extraordinary surge in engagements, reaching 67.1K, which is XXX% higher than its daily average and a staggering 4425.95% increase from the previous week.
- Creator Activity Increase: (20%) There has been a notable increase in active creators discussing $653m, with X unique social accounts posting in the last XX hours, a XX% rise from the previous day, indicating growing community interest.
Most Critical Themes:
- Declining Mentions: (10%) Despite high engagement, the number of mentions for $653m has decreased by XX% over the past week, suggesting a potential disconnect between general discussion and active engagement.
Top $653m Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"Here is the forest as I see it: X. Your headline number is that traders lost $653m to cover a $23m deficit. That didn't make sense to me so I wondered if your interpretation of the data was mistaken. Happy to dig more into it when you open-source the analysis but if your model of queue-based ADL is that the top N positions all have their equity values zeroed out then I wonder if you might have made the same mistake in your data analysis and interpreted the equity value of the positions being closed as their losses (or something similar to that) * The paper says that Hyperliquid and Binance's"
X Link @danrobinson 2025-12-11T07:54Z 80.2K followers, 10.2K engagements
"As another large HYPE holder accused me yesterday: "show me the tweet/paper and I'll show you the bags" There are a few things here that are worth pointing out despite everyone FUDing not reading the paper and making conclusions based on the post (skill issue illiteracy)"
X Link @tarunchitra 2025-12-11T05:16Z 78.2K followers, 166.4K engagements
"This paper is simply wrong about its central topic: how Hyperliquids ADL works. Tarun is describing a different (much crazier) algorithm which also might explain how he calculated that traders somehow paid $653m to cover a $23m deficit. 🧵"
X Link @danrobinson 2025-12-11T01:15Z 80.2K followers, 180.2K engagements
"hard to understand how we got from a $23M deficit covered by ADL to "$653M lost" there are a lot of good points brought up by this research but the only fair way to present what happened on 10/10 on @HyperliquidX is that 23M was haircut from the profitable traders - the 834m of realized PnL of closed positions was not "lost" ADL for a participant trading on a single exchange is very likely to lower their risk. for most users only trading on hyperliquid on 10/10 ADL closed their shorts at the market bottom and by ranking ADL by most profitable positions you almost always going to overshoot"
X Link @moonshiesty 2025-12-11T00:11Z 4505 followers, 1056 engagements